Literature DB >> 26554408

Prostate Cancer Screening.

Elie Mulhem1, Nikolaus Fulbright2, Norah Duncan1.   

Abstract

Among American men, prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death. Although prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing has been used to screen for prostate cancer for more than 25 years, the test has low sensitivity and specificity, and there is no clear evidence for determining what threshold warrants prostate biopsy. Only one of five randomized controlled trials of PSA screening showed an effect on prostate cancer-specific mortality, and the absolute reduction in deaths from prostate cancer was one per 781 men screened after 13 years of follow-up. None of the trials showed benefit in all-cause mortality, and screening increased prostate cancer diagnoses by about 60%. Harms of screening include adverse effects from prostate biopsy, overdiagnosis and overtreatment, and anxiety. One-half of screen-detected prostate cancers will not cause symptoms in the patient's lifetime, and 80% to 85% of men who choose observation will not die from prostate cancer within 15 years. Adverse effects of radical prostatectomy include perioperative complications, erectile dysfunction, and urinary incontinence. Radiation therapy can cause acute toxicity leading to urinary urgency, dysuria, diarrhea, and rectal pain; late toxicity includes erectile dysfunction, rectal bleeding, and urethral stricture. Despite variations across guidelines, no organization recommends routine PSA testing, and all endorse some form of shared decision-making before testing. If screening is performed, it should generally be discontinued at 70 years of age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26554408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Fam Physician        ISSN: 0002-838X            Impact factor:   3.292


  9 in total

1.  [Screening for prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) : A commentary on a systematic review and meta-analysis].

Authors:  A Borkowetz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening: Time to Change the Dominant Forces on the Pendulum.

Authors:  Jonathan E Shoag; Peter N Schlegel; Jim C Hu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Prostate Cancer Screening Patient Decision Aids: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilya Ivlev; Silvie Jerabkova; Meenakshi Mishra; Lily A Cook; Karen B Eden
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 4.  Routine Screening for Transgender and Gender Diverse Adults Taking Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy: a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Sean J Iwamoto; Frances Grimstad; Michael S Irwig; Micol S Rothman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  African American Women's Involvement in Promoting Informed Decision-Making for Prostate Cancer Screening Among Their Partners/Spouses.

Authors:  Jennifer D Allen; Ifedayo C Akinyemi; Amanda Reich; Sasha Fleary; Shalini Tendulkar; Nadeerah Lamour
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2018-01-04

Review 6.  Advice About Screening for Prostate Cancer With Prostate-Specific Antigen.

Authors:  Gannel Jean-Pierre
Journal:  J Adv Pract Oncol       Date:  2017-09-01

Review 7.  A Review of the Presentation of Overdiagnosis in Cancer Screening Patient Decision Aids.

Authors:  Ashley J Housten; Lisa M Lowenstein; Aubri Hoffman; Lianne E Jacobs; Zineb Zirari; Diana S Hoover; Dawn Stacey; Greg Pratt; Therese B Bevers; Robert J Volk
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2019-11-06

8.  Survival Analysis and a Novel Nomogram Model for Progression-Free Survival in Patients with Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Yuefu Han; Xingqiao Wen; Dong Chen; Xiaojuan Li; Qu Leng; Yuehui Wen; Jun Li; Weian Zhu
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 4.375

9.  The performance of 18F-PSMA PET/CT in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhi-Qiang Qin; Gao-Jian Pan; Zheng Xu; Hao Wang; Lu-Wei Xu; Rui-Peng Jia
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2022 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.054

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.