Mercè Correa1, Marta Pardo2, Pilar Bayarri3, Laura López-Cruz4, Noemí San Miguel5, Olga Valverde6, Catherine Ledent7, John D Salamone8. 1. Department of Psychobiology, Universitat Jaume I, Castelló, Spain. correa@uji.es. 2. Department of Psychobiology, Universitat Jaume I, Castelló, Spain. mpardodoc@gmail.com. 3. Department of Psychobiology, Universitat Jaume I, Castelló, Spain. pili.bayarri@hotmail.com. 4. Department of Psychobiology, Universitat Jaume I, Castelló, Spain. lcruz@psb.uji.es. 5. Department of Psychobiology, Universitat Jaume I, Castelló, Spain. nsanmigu@uji.es. 6. Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra and IMIM-Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain. olga.valverde@upf.edu. 7. Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Biologie Humaine et Moléculaire, Université Libre de Bruxelles, IRIBHM, Bruxelles, Belgium. cledent@ulb.ac.edu. 8. Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA. john.salamone@uconn.edu.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Mesolimbic dopamine (DA) regulates behavioral activation and effort-related decision-making in motivated behaviors. Mesolimbic DA D2 receptors are co-localized with adenosine A2A receptors, and they interact in an antagonistic manner. OBJECTIVES: A T-maze task was developed to assess dopaminergic involvement in preference between a reinforcer that involves vigorous voluntary activity (running wheel) and a reinforcer that requires minimal behavioral activation (sucrose pellets). Haloperidol (D2 antagonist) was administered to adenosine A2A receptor knockout (A2AKO) and wild-type (WT) littermate controls to assess the involvement of these two receptors in the selection of running wheel activity versus sucrose consumption. RESULTS: Under control conditions, mice spent more time running and less time eating. In WT mice, haloperidol reduced time running but actually increased time-consuming sucrose. However, A2AKO mice did not show the haloperidol-induced shift from running wheel activity to sucrose intake. Prefeeding reduced sucrose consumption in the T-maze in both strains, indicating that this paradigm is sensitive to motivational devaluation. Haloperidol increased c-Fos immunoreactivity in anterior cingulate cortex (ACg) and nucleus accumbens (Acb) core of WT but not KO mice. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that after DA antagonism, the preference for vigorous physical activity is reduced, while palatable food selection increases. Adenosine A2A receptor deletion provides resistance to these effects of D2 receptor antagonism. These two receptors in Acb core and ACg seem to be involved in the regulation of the intrinsic reinforcing characteristics of voluntary exercise but not in the regulation of the primary reinforcing characteristics of palatable sedentary reinforcers.
RATIONALE: Mesolimbic dopamine (DA) regulates behavioral activation and effort-related decision-making in motivated behaviors. Mesolimbic DA D2 receptors are co-localized with adenosine A2A receptors, and they interact in an antagonistic manner. OBJECTIVES: A T-maze task was developed to assess dopaminergic involvement in preference between a reinforcer that involves vigorous voluntary activity (running wheel) and a reinforcer that requires minimal behavioral activation (sucrose pellets). Haloperidol (D2 antagonist) was administered to adenosine A2A receptor knockout (A2AKO) and wild-type (WT) littermate controls to assess the involvement of these two receptors in the selection of running wheel activity versus sucrose consumption. RESULTS: Under control conditions, mice spent more time running and less time eating. In WT mice, haloperidol reduced time running but actually increased time-consuming sucrose. However, A2AKO mice did not show the haloperidol-induced shift from running wheel activity to sucrose intake. Prefeeding reduced sucrose consumption in the T-maze in both strains, indicating that this paradigm is sensitive to motivational devaluation. Haloperidol increased c-Fos immunoreactivity in anterior cingulate cortex (ACg) and nucleus accumbens (Acb) core of WT but not KO mice. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that after DA antagonism, the preference for vigorous physical activity is reduced, while palatable food selection increases. Adenosine A2A receptor deletion provides resistance to these effects of D2 receptor antagonism. These two receptors in Acb core and ACg seem to be involved in the regulation of the intrinsic reinforcing characteristics of voluntary exercise but not in the regulation of the primary reinforcing characteristics of palatable sedentary reinforcers.
Authors: Marta Pardo; Laura López-Cruz; Noemí San Miguel; John D Salamone; Mercè Correa Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2015-02-03 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Edênia C Menezes; Relish Shah; Lindsay Laughlin; K Yaragudri Vinod; John F Smiley; Catarina Cunha; Andrea Balla; Henry Sershen; Francisco X Castellanos; André Corvelo; Cátia M Teixeira Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2021-02-03 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Jen-Hau Yang; Rose E Presby; Adam A Jarvie; Renee A Rotolo; R Holly Fitch; Mercè Correa; John D Salamone Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2019-08-08 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: John D Salamone; Mercè Correa; Sarah Ferrigno; Jen-Hau Yang; Renee A Rotolo; Rose E Presby Journal: Pharmacol Rev Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 25.468
Authors: Carla Carratalá-Ros; Laura López-Cruz; Andrea Martínez-Verdú; Régulo Olivares-García; John D Salamone; Mercè Correa Journal: Front Behav Neurosci Date: 2021-07-09 Impact factor: 3.558