Britt McKinnon1, Seungmi Yang2, Michael S Kramer2, Tracey Bushnik2, Amanda J Sheppard2, Jay S Kaufman2. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (McKinnon, Yang, Kramer, Kaufman), McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montréal, Que.; Institute for Health and Social Policy (McKinnon, Kaufman), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Pediatrics (Kramer), McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montréal, Que.; Health Analysis Division (Bushnik), Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ont.; AboutKidsHealth (Sheppard), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.; Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Sheppard), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. britt.mckinnon@mcgill.ca. 2. Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health (McKinnon, Yang, Kramer, Kaufman), McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montréal, Que.; Institute for Health and Social Policy (McKinnon, Kaufman), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Pediatrics (Kramer), McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montréal, Que.; Health Analysis Division (Bushnik), Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ont.; AboutKidsHealth (Sheppard), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.; Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Sheppard), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A higher risk of preterm birth among black women than among white women is well established in the United States. We compared differences in preterm birth between non-Hispanic black and white women in Canada and the US, hypothesizing that disparities would be less extreme in Canada given the different historical experiences of black populations and Canada's universal health care system. METHODS: Using data on singleton live births in Canada and the US for 2004-2006, we estimated crude and adjusted risk ratios and risk differences in preterm birth (< 37 wk) and very preterm birth (< 32 wk) among non-Hispanic black versus non-Hispanic white women in each country. Adjusted models for the US were standardized to the covariate distribution of the Canadian cohort. RESULTS: In Canada, 8.9% and 5.9% of infants born to black and white mothers, respectively, were preterm; the corresponding figures in the US were 12.7% and 8.0%. Crude risk ratios for preterm birth among black women relative to white women were 1.49 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32 to 1.66) in Canada and 1.57 (95% CI 1.56 to 1.58) in the US (p value for heterogeneity [pH] = 0.3). The crude risk differences for preterm birth were 2.94 (95% CI 1.91 to 3.96) in Canada and 4.63 (95% CI 4.56 to 4.70) in the US (pH = 0.003). Adjusted risk ratios for preterm birth (pH = 0.1) were slightly higher in Canada than in the US, whereas adjusted risk differences were similar in both countries. Similar patterns were observed for racial disparities in very preterm birth. INTERPRETATION: Relative disparities in preterm birth and very preterm birth between non-Hispanic black and white women were similar in magnitude in Canada and the US. Absolute disparities were smaller in Canada, which reflects a lower overall risk of preterm birth in Canada than in the US in both black and white populations.
BACKGROUND: A higher risk of preterm birth among black women than among white women is well established in the United States. We compared differences in preterm birth between non-Hispanic black and white women in Canada and the US, hypothesizing that disparities would be less extreme in Canada given the different historical experiences of black populations and Canada's universal health care system. METHODS: Using data on singleton live births in Canada and the US for 2004-2006, we estimated crude and adjusted risk ratios and risk differences in preterm birth (< 37 wk) and very preterm birth (< 32 wk) among non-Hispanic black versus non-Hispanic white women in each country. Adjusted models for the US were standardized to the covariate distribution of the Canadian cohort. RESULTS: In Canada, 8.9% and 5.9% of infants born to black and white mothers, respectively, were preterm; the corresponding figures in the US were 12.7% and 8.0%. Crude risk ratios for preterm birth among black women relative to white women were 1.49 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32 to 1.66) in Canada and 1.57 (95% CI 1.56 to 1.58) in the US (p value for heterogeneity [pH] = 0.3). The crude risk differences for preterm birth were 2.94 (95% CI 1.91 to 3.96) in Canada and 4.63 (95% CI 4.56 to 4.70) in the US (pH = 0.003). Adjusted risk ratios for preterm birth (pH = 0.1) were slightly higher in Canada than in the US, whereas adjusted risk differences were similar in both countries. Similar patterns were observed for racial disparities in very preterm birth. INTERPRETATION: Relative disparities in preterm birth and very preterm birth between non-Hispanic black and white women were similar in magnitude in Canada and the US. Absolute disparities were smaller in Canada, which reflects a lower overall risk of preterm birth in Canada than in the US in both black and white populations.
Authors: Philip Blumenshine; Susan Egerter; Colleen J Barclay; Catherine Cubbin; Paula A Braveman Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: K S Joseph; Ling Huang; Shiliang Liu; Cande V Ananth; Alexander C Allen; Reg Sauve; Michael S Kramer Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Whitney P Witt; Erika R Cheng; Lauren E Wisk; Kristin Litzelman; Debanjana Chatterjee; Kara Mandell; Fathima Wakeel Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-12-19 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: A C J Ravelli; M Tromp; M Eskes; J C Droog; J A M van der Post; K J Jager; B W Mol; J B Reitsma Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2010-08-18 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Misbath Daouda; Lucas Henneman; Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou; Alison Gemmill; Corwin Zigler; Joan Casey Journal: Environ Res Lett Date: 2021-03-02 Impact factor: 6.793
Authors: Samera F AlBasri; Ghadah M Shouib; Osama S Bajouh; Hasan A Nasrat; Ejaz Ahmad; Fahad M AlGreisi Journal: Saudi Med J Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 1.484
Authors: Heather H Burris; Clyde J Wright; Haresh Kirpalani; James W Collins; Scott A Lorch; Michal A Elovitz; Sunah S Hwang Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2019-08-05 Impact factor: 3.756