Literature DB >> 26553751

Distal esophageal spasm and the Chicago classification: is timing everything?

H U De Schepper1,2, F A M Ponds1, J M Oors1, A J P M Smout1, A J Bredenoord1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: According to the Chicago classification of esophageal motility disorders, distal esophageal spasm (DES) is defined as premature esophageal contractions (distal latency [DL] <4.5 s) for ≥20% of swallows, in the presence of a normal mean integral relaxation pressure (IRP). However, some patients with symptoms of DES have rapid contractions with a normal DL. The aim of this study was to characterize these patients and compare their clinical characteristics to those of patients classified as DES.
METHODS: We retrospectively compared clinical characteristics and high-resolution manometry findings of patients with rapid contractions with normal latency to those meeting the Chicago classification criteria for DES. KEY
RESULTS: Over a 3-year period, nine patients were diagnosed with DES and 14 showed rapid contractions in the distal esophagus with normal latency. The latter were younger than DES patients (60 ± 4 vs 72 ± 3 years, p < 0.05). Dysphagia and retrosternal pain occurred to a similar degree in both groups. Weight loss and abnormal barium esophagogram tended to be more frequent in DES patients. There was no difference in contractile front velocity (CFV) and in distal contractile integral (DCI) between patients with DES and rapid contractions with normal latency. Lower esophageal sphincter pressures were not different between groups. However, IRP was significantly higher in DES compared to rapid contractions with normal latency (11.7 ± 0.6 mmHg vs 7.6 ± 1.2 mmHg, p < 0.05), albeit still within the normal range. CONCLUSIONS &amp; INFERENCES: These data suggest that patients with simultaneous contractions with normal latency represent a group of patients with many features similar to DES.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  distal esophageal spasm; distal latency; high-resolution esophageal motility

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26553751     DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  6 in total

Review 1.  Neuronal Control of Esophageal Peristalsis and Its Role in Esophageal Disease.

Authors:  K Nikaki; A Sawada; A Ustaoglu; D Sifrim
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2019-11-23

Review 2.  Chicago Classification of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Applications and Limits in Adults and Pediatric Patients with Esophageal Symptoms.

Authors:  Kornilia Nikaki; Joanne Li Shen Ooi; Daniel Sifrim
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-11

3.  Factors Determining the Inter-observer Variability and Diagnostic Accuracy of High-resolution Manometry for Esophageal Motility Disorders.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Kim; Sung Eun Kim; Yu Kyung Cho; Chul-Hyun Lim; Moo In Park; Jin Won Hwang; Jae-Sik Jang; Minkyung Oh
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 4.924

Review 4.  Chicago Classification of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Lessons Learned.

Authors:  W O A Rohof; A J Bredenoord
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2017-08

5.  Elevated average maximum intrabolus pressure on high-resolution manometry is associated with esophageal dysmotility and delayed esophageal emptying on timed barium esophagram.

Authors:  Katelyn E Madigan; J Shawn Smith; Joni K Evans; Steven B Clayton
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Comparison of motor diagnoses by Chicago Classification versions 2.0 and 3.0 on esophageal high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  A Patel; B Cassell; N Sainani; D Wang; B Shahid; M Bennett; F A Mirza; S Munigala; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.598

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.