R Gil-Gouveia1,2, A G Oliveira3, I P Martins1. 1. Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal. 2. Headache Center, Hospital da Luz, Lisboa, Portugal. 3. Pharmacy Department, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Petrópolis, Brasil.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence of attack-related cognitive dysfunction in migraine is growing. Controversy exists on whether cognitive dysfunction, mainly executive, may persist between attacks. Measuring the impact of cognitive function is gaining importance in clinical and research settings in migraine. OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of interictal migraine patients to controls in an assembled neuropsychological battery focused on executive functions and to study the practice effect of its repeated applications. METHOD: Assembly of the battery that was then applied twice within 6 weeks to interictal migraineurs and matched healthy controls. RESULTS: Migraine patients (n = 24) and controls (n = 24) had similar performance in both applications of the battery. There was a slight practice effect between the first and second evaluation, significant in Stroop Interference test (P = 0.002, multiplicity corrected); a meaningful score change was determined for each raw test scores. CONCLUSIONS: Interictal migraineurs and controls performance is identical in a brief cognitive battery focused on executive functions. Repeated applications produced a practice effect that was quantified.
BACKGROUND: Evidence of attack-related cognitive dysfunction in migraine is growing. Controversy exists on whether cognitive dysfunction, mainly executive, may persist between attacks. Measuring the impact of cognitive function is gaining importance in clinical and research settings in migraine. OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of interictal migrainepatients to controls in an assembled neuropsychological battery focused on executive functions and to study the practice effect of its repeated applications. METHOD: Assembly of the battery that was then applied twice within 6 weeks to interictal migraineurs and matched healthy controls. RESULTS:Migrainepatients (n = 24) and controls (n = 24) had similar performance in both applications of the battery. There was a slight practice effect between the first and second evaluation, significant in Stroop Interference test (P = 0.002, multiplicity corrected); a meaningful score change was determined for each raw test scores. CONCLUSIONS: Interictal migraineurs and controls performance is identical in a brief cognitive battery focused on executive functions. Repeated applications produced a practice effect that was quantified.