Literature DB >> 26553578

Clinical Practice Patterns in Chemotherapeutic Treatment Regimens for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

James McLean1, Young Soo Rho1, Gayathri Kuruba1, Aline Mamo1, Marine Gilabert1, Tomas Kavan1, Lawrence Panasci2, David Melnychuk2, Gerald Batist2, Petr Kavan3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has evolved during the past 2 decades, and patient survival has increased. Consequently, patients are exposed to more chemotherapeutic agents and regimens. Little is known about therapeutic drug sequencing and the factors influencing these choices.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational, retrospective medical record review was conducted of patients with newly diagnosed adult mCRC from January 2002 to September 2013 identified in the McGill University-Jewish General Hospital's local tumor registry. All patients presented with mCRC (stage IV) and received ≥ 2 cycles and/or ≥ 28 days of first-line chemotherapy. The patient demographics, CRC characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes were recorded. The reason for changing or halting therapy was also reported.
RESULTS: Of the 215 patients who underwent treatment, 74.4% received second-line, 36% third-line, and 16.3% fourth-line treatment. In total, 88% received ≥ 3 classes of cytotoxic chemotherapy and 80% received ≥ 1 biologic agent. The most common first-line treatment was FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin) (47.4%) or CAPOX (capecitabine, oxaliplatin) (28.8%), and more than one half received bevacizumab (56%). Among the second- and third-line treatments, FOLFIRI (irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin) was the most common (40.3% and 30.3%, respectively), and bevacizumab was the most frequently used biologic agent (48.1% and 39.2%, respectively). For fourth-line treatment and beyond, most patients participated in clinical trials (45.7%) or received panitumumab monotherapy (31.4%). Across the first 4 therapy lines, disease progression was the primary motive for discontinuation (39.5%, 53.8%, 58.2%, and 37.1%).
CONCLUSION: FOLFOX was the most common first-line and FOLFIRI the most common second- and third-line mCRC therapy. Bevacizumab was the most frequently used targeted therapy across all 3 treatment lines. Therapy discontinuation was primarily due to disease progression.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attrition; Biologic; Discontinuation of therapy; Longitudinal; Real world

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26553578     DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2015.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer        ISSN: 1533-0028            Impact factor:   4.481


  10 in total

1.  Treatment patterns and survival outcomes for patients receiving second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer in the USA.

Authors:  Lisa M Hess; Zhanglin Lin Cui; Daniel S Mytelka; Yimei Han; Robert Goodloe; William Schelman
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  A retrospective observational study to estimate the attrition of patients across lines of systemic treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer in Canada.

Authors:  H Kennecke; S Berry; J Maroun; P Kavan; N Aucoin; F Couture; M Poulin-Costello; B Gillesby
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Simulating Progression-Free and Overall Survival for First-Line Doublet Chemotherapy With or Without Bevacizumab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Based on Real-World Registry Data.

Authors:  Peter Gibbs; Maarten IJzerman; Koen Degeling; Hui-Li Wong; Hendrik Koffijberg; Azim Jalali; Jeremy Shapiro; Suzanne Kosmider; Rachel Wong; Belinda Lee; Matthew Burge; Jeanne Tie; Desmond Yip; Louise Nott; Adnan Khattak; Stephanie Lim; Susan Caird
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Reduced NOV expression correlates with disease progression in colorectal cancer and is associated with survival, invasion and chemoresistance of cancer cells.

Authors:  Jun Li; Lin Ye; Ping-Hui Sun; Fei Zheng; Fiona Ruge; Lucy K Satherley; Yi Feng; Huishan Zhao; Guifang Du; Tingting Wang; Yao Yang; Xuemei Ma; Shan Cheng; Xiaomei Yang; Hefen Yu; Xu Teng; Yang Si; Zhongtao Zhang; Wen G Jiang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-18

Review 5.  Maximising clinical benefit with adequate patient management beyond the second line in mCRC.

Authors:  Guillem Argiles; Dirk Arnold; Gerald Prager; Alberto F Sobrero; Eric Van Cutsem
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2019-05-13

6.  Genomic profiles of colorectal carcinoma with liver metastases and newly identified fusion genes.

Authors:  Takafumi Oga; Yoshihiro Yamashita; Manabu Soda; Shinya Kojima; Toshihide Ueno; Masahito Kawazu; Nobuaki Suzuki; Hiroaki Nagano; Shoichi Hazama; Masashi Izumiya; Kazuhiko Koike; Hiroyuki Mano
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 6.716

7.  Nephroblastoma overexpressed protein (NOV) enhances 5-Fu-mediated inhibitory effect of colorectal cancer cell proliferation via JNK/AP-1/caspase-8/caspase-3 pathway.

Authors:  Dong Wang; Tingting Wang; Yongbo An; Lan Jin; Jin Wang; Guocong Wu; Hongwei Yao; Zhongtao Zhang; Jun Li
Journal:  Discov Oncol       Date:  2021-03-22

8.  Beyond second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  D Arnold; G W Prager; A Quintela; A Stein; S Moreno Vera; N Mounedji; J Taieb
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Integrated analysis highlights APC11 protein expression as a likely new independent predictive marker for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Youenn Drouet; Isabelle Treilleux; Alain Viari; Sophie Léon; Mojgan Devouassoux-Shisheboran; Nicolas Voirin; Christelle de la Fouchardière; Brigitte Manship; Alain Puisieux; Christine Lasset; Caroline Moyret-Lalle
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Continuing Cetuximab vs Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy after first progression in wild-type KRAS, NRAS and BRAF V600E metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II trial.

Authors:  Danyang Li; Feng Wang; Shuning Xu; Ke Li; Xiangrui Meng; Yangyang Huang; Ning Ma; Lei Qiao; Gaizhen Kuang; Jinghong Chen; Ying Liu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 4.207

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.