Susan L Calcaterra1,2, Traci E Yamashita3, Sung-Joon Min4, Angela Keniston5, Joseph W Frank6,7, Ingrid A Binswanger6,8. 1. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA. susan.calcaterra@ucdenver.edu. 2. Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, Colorado, USA. susan.calcaterra@ucdenver.edu. 3. School of Medicine, Undergraduate Medical Education, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA. 4. Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA. 5. Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, Colorado, USA. 6. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA. 7. VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver, CO, USA. 8. Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, CO, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic opioid therapy for chronic pain treatment has increased. Hospital physicians, including hospitalists and medical/surgical resident physicians, care for many hospitalized patients, yet little is known about opioid prescribing at hospital discharge and future chronic opioid use. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize opioid prescribing at hospital discharge among 'opioid naïve' patients. Opioid naïve patients had not filled an opioid prescription at an affiliated pharmacy 1 year preceding their hospital discharge. We also set out to quantify the risk of chronic opioid use and opioid refills 1 year post discharge among opioid naïve patients with and without opioid receipt at discharge. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: From 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2011, 6,689 opioid naïve patients were discharged from a safety-net hospital. MAIN MEASURE: Chronic opioid use 1 year post discharge. KEY RESULTS: Twenty-five percent of opioid naïve patients (n = 1,688) had opioid receipt within 72 hours of discharge. Patients with opioid receipt were more likely to have diagnoses including neoplasm (6.3% versus 3.5%, p < 0.001), acute pain (2.7% versus 1.0 %, p < 0.001), chronic pain at admission (12.1% versus 3.3%, p < 0.001) or surgery during their hospitalization (65.1% versus 18.4%, p < 0.001) compared to patients without opioid receipt. Patients with opioid receipt were less likely to have alcohol use disorders (15.7% versus 20.7%, p < 0.001) and mental health disorders (23.9% versus 31.4%, p < 0.001) compared to patients without opioid receipt. Chronic opioid use 1 year post discharge was more common among patients with opioid receipt (4.1% versus 1.3%, p < 0.0001) compared to patients without opioid receipt. Opioid receipt was associated with increased odds of chronic opioid use (AOR = 4.90, 95% CI 3.22-7.45) and greater subsequent opioid refills (AOR = 2.67, 95% CI 2.29-3.13) 1 year post discharge compared to no opioid receipt. CONCLUSION: Opioid receipt at hospital discharge among opioid naïve patients increased future chronic opioid use. Physicians should inform patients of this risk prior to prescribing opioids at discharge.
BACKGROUND: Chronic opioid therapy for chronic pain treatment has increased. Hospital physicians, including hospitalists and medical/surgical resident physicians, care for many hospitalized patients, yet little is known about opioid prescribing at hospital discharge and future chronic opioid use. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize opioid prescribing at hospital discharge among 'opioid naïve' patients. Opioid naïve patients had not filled an opioid prescription at an affiliated pharmacy 1 year preceding their hospital discharge. We also set out to quantify the risk of chronic opioid use and opioid refills 1 year post discharge among opioid naïve patients with and without opioid receipt at discharge. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: From 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2011, 6,689 opioid naïve patients were discharged from a safety-net hospital. MAIN MEASURE: Chronic opioid use 1 year post discharge. KEY RESULTS: Twenty-five percent of opioid naïve patients (n = 1,688) had opioid receipt within 72 hours of discharge. Patients with opioid receipt were more likely to have diagnoses including neoplasm (6.3% versus 3.5%, p < 0.001), acute pain (2.7% versus 1.0 %, p < 0.001), chronic pain at admission (12.1% versus 3.3%, p < 0.001) or surgery during their hospitalization (65.1% versus 18.4%, p < 0.001) compared to patients without opioid receipt. Patients with opioid receipt were less likely to have alcohol use disorders (15.7% versus 20.7%, p < 0.001) and mental health disorders (23.9% versus 31.4%, p < 0.001) compared to patients without opioid receipt. Chronic opioid use 1 year post discharge was more common among patients with opioid receipt (4.1% versus 1.3%, p < 0.0001) compared to patients without opioid receipt. Opioid receipt was associated with increased odds of chronic opioid use (AOR = 4.90, 95% CI 3.22-7.45) and greater subsequent opioid refills (AOR = 2.67, 95% CI 2.29-3.13) 1 year post discharge compared to no opioid receipt. CONCLUSION: Opioid receipt at hospital discharge among opioid naïve patients increased future chronic opioid use. Physicians should inform patients of this risk prior to prescribing opioids at discharge.
Authors: Anthony Scott; Peter Sivey; Driss Ait Ouakrim; Lisa Willenberg; Lucio Naccarella; John Furler; Doris Young Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2011-09-07
Authors: Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Salahadin Abdi; Sairam Atluri; Carl C Balog; Ramsin M Benyamin; Mark V Boswell; Keith R Brown; Brian M Bruel; David A Bryce; Patricia A Burks; Allen W Burton; Aaron K Calodney; David L Caraway; Kimberly A Cash; Paul J Christo; Kim S Damron; Sukdeb Datta; Timothy R Deer; Sudhir Diwan; Ike Eriator; Frank J E Falco; Bert Fellows; Stephanie Geffert; Christopher G Gharibo; Scott E Glaser; Jay S Grider; Haroon Hameed; Mariam Hameed; Hans Hansen; Michael E Harned; Salim M Hayek; Standiford Helm; Joshua A Hirsch; Jeffrey W Janata; Alan D Kaye; Adam M Kaye; David S Kloth; Dhanalakshmi Koyyalagunta; Marion Lee; Yogesh Malla; Kavita N Manchikanti; Carla D McManus; Vidyasagar Pampati; Allan T Parr; Ramarao Pasupuleti; Vikram B Patel; Nalini Sehgal; Sanford M Silverman; Vijay Singh; Howard S Smith; Lee T Snook; Daneshvari R Solanki; Deborah H Tracy; Ricardo Vallejo; Bradley W Wargo Journal: Pain Physician Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Michael Von Korff; Michael Von Korff; Kathleen Saunders; Gary Thomas Ray; Denise Boudreau; Cynthia Campbell; Joseph Merrill; Mark D Sullivan; Carolyn M Rutter; Michael J Silverberg; Caleb Banta-Green; Constance Weisner Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2008 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.442
Authors: Eric L Garland; Anne K Baker; Paula Larsen; Michael R Riquino; Sarah E Priddy; Elizabeth Thomas; Adam W Hanley; Patricia Galbraith; Nathan Wanner; Yoshio Nakamura Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-07-12 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Lisa X Deng; Kanan Patel; Christine Miaskowski; Ingrid Maravilla; Sarah Schear; Sarah Garrigues; Nicole Thompson; Andrew D Auerbach; Christine S Ritchie Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-08-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Ali B Abbasi; Elizabeth Salisbury-Afshar; Dejan Jovanov; Craig Berberet; Ponni Arunkumar; Steven E Aks; Jennifer E Layden; Mai T Pho Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Chad M Brummett; Jackie Evans-Shields; Christina England; Amanda M Kong; Carolyn R Lew; Caroline Henriques; Nicole M Zimmerman; Eric C Sun Journal: J Manag Care Spec Pharm Date: 2021-02-24