| Literature DB >> 26553227 |
Michael Schöll1,2, Stephen F Carter1,3, Eric Westman4, Elena Rodriguez-Vieitez1, Ove Almkvist1,5,6, Steinunn Thordardottir5,7, Anders Wall8, Caroline Graff5,7, Bengt Långström9, Agneta Nordberg1,5.
Abstract
Studying autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease (ADAD), caused by gene mutations yielding nearly complete penetrance and a distinct age of symptom onset, allows investigation of presymptomatic pathological processes that can identify a therapeutic window for disease-modifying therapies. Astrocyte activation may occur in presymptomatic Alzheimer's disease (AD) because reactive astrocytes surround β-amyloid (Aβ) plaques in autopsy brain tissue. Positron emission tomography was performed to investigate fibrillar Aβ, astrocytosis and cerebral glucose metabolism with the radiotracers (11)C-Pittsburgh compound-B (PIB), (11)C-deuterium-L-deprenyl (DED) and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) respectively in presymptomatic and symptomatic ADAD participants (n = 21), patients with mild cognitive impairment (n = 11) and sporadic AD (n = 7). Multivariate analysis using the combined data from all radiotracers clearly separated the different groups along the first and second principal components according to increased PIB retention/decreased FDG uptake (component 1) and increased DED binding (component 2). Presymptomatic ADAD mutation carriers showed significantly higher PIB retention than non-carriers in all brain regions except the hippocampus. DED binding was highest in presymptomatic ADAD mutation carriers. This suggests that non-fibrillar Aβ or early stage plaque depostion might interact with inflammatory responses indicating astrocytosis as an early contributory driving force in AD pathology. The novelty of this finding will be investigated in longitudinal follow-up studies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26553227 PMCID: PMC4639762 DOI: 10.1038/srep16404
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Demographic information.
| sAD | MCI PIB+ | MCI PIB− | Mutationnon-carriers | Presymptomaticmutationcarriers | Symptomaticmutationcarriers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 8 | 3 | 12 | 6 | 3 | |
| Age (y) | 64.1 ± 6.1C,D (55–73) | 61.9 ± 6.8H (53–75) | 64.3 ± 6.7K (60–72) | 54.3 ± 12.9M | 43.5 ± 9.3 | 58.7 ± 5.0 |
| Gender (m/f) | 5/2 | 4/4 | 2/1 | 8/4 | 2/1 | |
| MMSE | 24.4 ± 5.7C,D,E (14–30) | 27.7 ± 1.9 (24–30) | 27.7 ± 2.3 (25–29) | 29.3 ± 1.1 (27–30) | 29.6 ± 0.6 (29–30) | 16.0 ± 8.7 (11–26) |
| Education (y) | 10.4 ± 1.8A,B (8–13) | 14.0 ± 2.5G (11–18) | 13.7 ± 2.1 (12–16) | 11.3 ± 2.3 | 13.2 ± 2.6 | 10.0 ± 1.0 |
| Mutations | PSEN1 H163Y; APPswe; APParc | PSEN1 H163Y; APPswe; APParc | ||||
| Time to expected age at symptom onset (y) | −11.8 ± 8.1 | 1.9 ± 2.6 | ||||
| APOE ε | 3/3: 2; 3/4: 2; 4/4: 3 | 3/3: 2; 3/4: 6 | 3/3: 2; 3/4: 1 | 2/3: 1; 3/3: 7; 3/4: 3; 4/4: 1 | 3/3: 3; 3/4: 3 | 3/3: 1; 2/4: 1; 3/4: 1 |
| FSIQ global cognition composite z-score | − | −0.9 ± 1.8 | −0.2 ± 1.4 | −0.2 ± 1.5 | 0.3 ± 1.3 | − |
| Episodic memory composite z-score# | − | −1.3 ± 0.7 | −0.9 ± 0.9 | −0.1 ± 0.5 | 0.0 ± 0.5 | − |
| sAD | MCI PIB+ | MCI PIB− | Non-carriers | Presymptomatic carriers | Symptomatic carriers | |
| sAD | A | B | C | D | E | |
| MCI PIB+ | A | F | G | H | I | |
| MCI PIB− | B | F | J | K | L | |
| Non-carriers | C | G | J | M | N | |
| Presymptomatic carriers | D | H | K | M | O | |
| Symptomatic carriers | E | I | L | N | O | |
All values are means ± SD (range), unless stated otherwise. Superscript letters indicate significant differences between groups (see legend ** for group comparison codes, Fisher’s LSD post-hoc test, p < 0.05). *Gender distribution of presymptomatic autosomal dominant AD mutation carriers is not revealed to preserve confidentiality; #sum of Rey auditory verbal learning test, total learning and delayed retention test, and Rey Osterrieth retention test scores. sAD = sporadic Alzheimer’s disease; ADAD = autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease; APOE = apolipoprotein E; FSIQ = full-scale intelligence quotient; MCI = mild cognitive impairment; MMSE = mini-mental state examination; PIB = Pittsburgh compound-B. Z-scores below −1.645 were considered outside normal range (italics).
** Legend for pairwise comparisons using Fisher’s LSD post hoc test.
Detailed neuropsychological test results.
| sAD | MCI PIB+ | MCI PIB− | Mutationnon-carriers | Presymptomaticmutation carriers | Symptomaticmutation carriers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAIS-R Information | − | −0.84 (0.60) | −0.89 (0.90) | −0.40 (1.03) | 0.18 (0.53) | −0.75 (1.85) |
| WAIS-R Similarities | −1.52 (1.54) | −0.64 (1.18) | 0.67 (0.79) | 0.08 (1.11) | −0.15 (0.79) | −0.94 (0.94) |
| WAIS-R Block Design | − | −0.85 (1.17) | 0.23 (1.75) | 0.43 (1.14) | 0.73 (0.81) | −1.16 (1.42) |
| WAIS-R Digit Symbol | −1.17 (1.17) | −0.75 (1.07) | −0.19 (1.44) | 0.20 (0.51) | −0.03 (0.36) | −1.56 (1.49) |
| Rey-Osterrieth copy | − | −0.40 (0.54) | −0.30 (0.88) | −0.15 (0.46) | −0.28 (0.35) | − |
| Rey-Osterrieth recall | − | −1.37 (0.71) | −0.74 (1.16) | −0.59 (0.85) | −0.22 (0.53) | −1.61 (2.39) |
| RAVLT trial 1–5 total | − | −1.30 (0.90) | 0.62 (0.72) | −0.61 (0.67) | −0.50 (0.74) | − |
| RAVLT delayed recall | − | − | −1.38 (0.66) | −0.38 (0.83) | −1.25 (1.07) | − |
| Digit Span forward UD | −1.23 (0.73) | −0.75 (0.83) | −0.90 (1.29) | 0.20 (1.07) | −0.18 (1.66) | −1.02 (1.05) |
| Corsi Span UD | − | − | −0.49 (2.93) | 0.24 (1.20) | −0.93 (1.38) | − |
| Trail Making A time (s) | − | −1.14 (1.61) | −0.62 (0.65) | 0.85 (0.60) | 0.78 (0.47) | 0.27 (0.08) |
| Trail Making B time (s) | − | −0.80 (1.36) | −0.44 (1.01) | 0.38 (0.42) | 0.09 (0.36) | − |
All values are means (SD) of z-scores, z-scores below −1.645 were considered outside normal range (italics). WAIS-R: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Revised; RAVLT: Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test.
Figure 1(a) Scatter plot displaying results from all examined individuals according to Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Distribution along the first two components is shown. (b) The figure displays a simplified summary of the PCA data for each group; the central shapes represent the mean PCA score for each group, bars represent standard deviations for each group on each principal component.
Figure 2Scatter plots showing all individual PIB retention data in composite cortical (a) and subcortical (b) bilateral brain regions.
Figure 3Scatter plots showing all individual DED slope data in composite cortical (a) and subcortical (b) bilateral brain regions. No data are shown for the cerebellum since this was used as the reference region in the modified Patlak reference tissue model.
Figure 4Scatter plots showing all individual FDG uptake data in composite cortical (a) and subcortical (b) bilateral brain regions.
Figure 5Progression of PET biomarkers in ADAD mutation carriers.
Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) results are displayed for ADAD mutation carriers (n = 7). Each pair of columns represents an individual mutation carrier compared to five age-matched non-carriers. Each pair of rows represents a different PET biomarker. The scale from left to right represents the approximate time (in years) to the expected onset of clinical symptoms. All SPM clusters shown are significant at p < 0.001 (uncorrected). The figure demonstrates the progressive and heterogeneous nature of Alzheimer’s disease pathology as the expected onset of clinical symptoms approaches; neocortical fibrillar Aβ increases (PIB retention, top two rows), astrocytosis decreases (DED binding, middle two rows), glucose metabolism decreases (FDG hypometabolism shown, bottom two rows).