Literature DB >> 26551956

Practice Trends in the Use of Extracorporeal Treatments for Poisoning in Four Countries.

Marc Ghannoum1, Valery Lavergne2, Sophie Gosselin3, James B Mowry4, Lotte C G Hoegberg5, Mark Yarema6,7, Margaret Thompson8, Nancy Murphy9, John Thompson10, Roy Purssell11, Robert S Hoffman12.   

Abstract

Extracorporeal treatments (ECTRs) such as hemodialysis (HD), enhance the elimination of a small number of toxins. Changes in overdose trends, prescribing practices, antidotes, and dialysis techniques may alter the indications and rates of ECTR use over time. This study analyzed trends in ECTR for poisonings in four countries. A retrospective study of national poison center databases from the United States, Denmark, United Kingdom, and five regional databases within Canada was performed. All cases of patients receiving an ECTR were included. ECTR cases were totalled annually and reported as annual rates per 100,000 exposures with stratification per types of ECTR and toxins. The data collection varied by countries. United States, 1985-2014; United Kingdom, 2011-2013; Denmark, 2005-2014, and regions of Canada as follows: Alberta, 1991-2015; Saskatchewan, 2001-2015; Nova Scotia-PEI, 2006-2015; Quebec, 2008-2014; Ontario-Manitoba, 2009-2015; British Columbia, 2012-2015. During the study period, the total number of ECTRs and rates per 100,000 exposures, respectively, were: United States, 40,258 and 65.7; United Kingdom, 343 and 232.6; Denmark, 616 and 305.5; Canada, 2709 and 177.5; case rates increased over time for the United States, Denmark, and Canada, but decreased in the United Kingdom. Across the United States and Denmark, HD was the preferred modality used. Toxins for which ECTR was most often used were: United States, ethylene glycol; Canada, methanol; United Kingdom, ethylene glycol; Denmark, salicylates. A high number of ECTRs were performed for atypical toxins such as acetaminophen and benzodiazepines. These data demonstrate a growing use of HD for poisoning with significant regional variations in the overall rates and indications.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26551956     DOI: 10.1111/sdi.12448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Dial        ISSN: 0894-0959            Impact factor:   3.455


  4 in total

Review 1.  Acute Renal Failure of Nosocomial Origin.

Authors:  Mark Dominik Alscher; Christiane Erley; Martin K Kuhlmann
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 2.  Extracorporeal Removal of Poisons and Toxins.

Authors:  Joshua David King; Moritz H Kern; Bernard G Jaar
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Evidence-based recommendations for haemodialysis in lithium-poisoned patients: Getting from where we are to where we want to be.

Authors:  Robert S Hoffman
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Outcomes after toxic alcohol poisoning: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Carol Wang; Daniel Samaha; Swapnil Hiremath; Lindsey Sikora; Manish M Sood; Salmaan Kanji; Edward G Clark
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.