Esther D Rozeboom1, Barbara A Bastiaansen2, Elsemieke S de Vries2, Evelien Dekker2, Paul A Fockens2, Ivo A M J Broeders3. 1. Department of Robotics and Mechatronics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Robotics and Mechatronics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The flexible endoscope is used as a platform for minimally invasive interventions. However, control of the conventional endoscope and multiple instruments is difficult. Robotic assistance could provide a solution and better control for a single operator. A novel platform should also enable interventions in areas that are currently difficult to reach. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of a robotic platform that guides a conventional endoscope through the large bowel. METHODS: Adult patients scheduled for routine diagnostic colonoscopy were included in this feasibility study. The endoscope was introduced using a robotic add-on to provide tip bending and air/water actuation. The endoscopist directly controlled the endoscope shaft. Upon cecal intubation, the add-on was detached and the procedure continued using conventional control. Primary evaluation parameters were the number of serious adverse events and the percentage of successful cecal intubations. RESULTS: The procedure was performed on 22 consecutive patients who all gave informed consent. There were no serious adverse events. Cecal intubation was successful in 15 patients (68%) using the robotic add-on. Six cases were completed after conversion to conventional control: 3 cases were converted to pass sharp angulation in the flexures and 3 cases were converted after technical difficulties. One case was not successful with either technique because of severe diverticulosis. CONCLUSIONS: The robotic add-on steering module allows safe endoscope intubation to reach intervention sites throughout the large bowel. The next step is to clinically evaluate complementary instrument and shaft-guiding modules in therapeutic procedures.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The flexible endoscope is used as a platform for minimally invasive interventions. However, control of the conventional endoscope and multiple instruments is difficult. Robotic assistance could provide a solution and better control for a single operator. A novel platform should also enable interventions in areas that are currently difficult to reach. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of a robotic platform that guides a conventional endoscope through the large bowel. METHODS: Adult patients scheduled for routine diagnostic colonoscopy were included in this feasibility study. The endoscope was introduced using a robotic add-on to provide tip bending and air/water actuation. The endoscopist directly controlled the endoscope shaft. Upon cecal intubation, the add-on was detached and the procedure continued using conventional control. Primary evaluation parameters were the number of serious adverse events and the percentage of successful cecal intubations. RESULTS: The procedure was performed on 22 consecutive patients who all gave informed consent. There were no serious adverse events. Cecal intubation was successful in 15 patients (68%) using the robotic add-on. Six cases were completed after conversion to conventional control: 3 cases were converted to pass sharp angulation in the flexures and 3 cases were converted after technical difficulties. One case was not successful with either technique because of severe diverticulosis. CONCLUSIONS: The robotic add-on steering module allows safe endoscope intubation to reach intervention sites throughout the large bowel. The next step is to clinically evaluate complementary instrument and shaft-guiding modules in therapeutic procedures.