| Literature DB >> 26551663 |
Claire J Steves1, Mitul M Mehta, Stephen H D Jackson, Tim D Spector.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many observational studies have shown a protective effect of physical activity on cognitive ageing, but interventional studies have been less convincing. This may be due to short time scales of interventions, suboptimal interventional regimes or lack of lasting effect. Confounding through common genetic and developmental causes is also possible.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26551663 PMCID: PMC4789972 DOI: 10.1159/000441029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gerontology ISSN: 0304-324X Impact factor: 5.140
Multiple linear regression of factors predicting 10-year age-related change in cognition
| IDs | Level 5: disease | Level 4: health measures | Level 3: lifestyle | Level 2: adult psychosocial | Level 1: developmental | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | p | β | p | β | p | β | p | β | p | |
| Age (per year) | ||||||||||
| Birthweight | 0.011 | n.s. | −0.007 | n.s. | −0.006 | n.s. | 0.010 | n.s. | 0.014 | n.s. |
| Adult height | 0.038 | n.s. | 0.031 | n.s. | 0.020 | n.s. | 0.069 | n.s. | 0.077 | n.s. |
| Adult ability | 0.117 | 0.069 | 0.110 | 0.050 | 0.113 | 0.082 | 0.085 | n.s. | 0.090 | n.s. |
| Occupation | 0.043 | n.s. | 0.054 | n.s. | 0.038 | n.s. | 0.049 | n.s. | ||
| Household income | 0.063 | n.s. | 0.057 | n.s. | 0.062 | n.s. | 0.092 | n.s. | ||
| Mental health score | 0.030 | n.s. | 0.030 | n.s. | 0.018 | n.s. | 0.003 | n.s. | ||
| Smoking | −0.034 | n.s. | −0.039 | n.s. | −0.025 | n.s. | ||||
| Alcohol | −0.045 | n.s. | −0.015 | n.s. | −0.021 | n.s. | ||||
| Dietary saturated fat | −0.144 | 0.017 | −0.119 | 0.045 | −0.105 | 0.075 | ||||
| Total vegetables | −0.065 | n.s. | −0.058 | n.s. | −0.063 | n.s. | ||||
| Leg extensor power | ||||||||||
| Physical activity | 0.107 | 0.056 | 0.122 | 0.033 | 0.129 | 0.028 | ||||
| Blood pressure | −0.125 | 0.017 | −0.120 | 0.023 | ||||||
| Waist-hip ratio | −0.038 | n.s. | −0.036 | n.s. | ||||||
| Glucose | 0.012 | n.s. | ||||||||
| TChol/HDL ratio | 0.062 | n.s. | 0.061 | n.s. | ||||||
| Ischaemic heart disease | −0.300 | n.s. | ||||||||
| Diabetes (T2) | ||||||||||
Age-related change was modelled using the ARC factor (first factor of change in 7 computerised neuropsychometric tests from the CANTAB battery, over 10 years). Results are presented using a hierarchical framework of levels ranging from developmental effects to adult disease. Missing values were imputed using multiple imputation. Betas are all standardised, except in the case of diseases, occupation and age. Occupation is modelled as a dummy variable with manual = 1, non-manual = 0. Text in bold indicates factors significant with Bonferroni correction. p values are provided for trends (two-tailed significance between 0.1 and 0.00778). Where findings were in the opposite direction to expected, they are in italics.
Reduced models for predictors of age related change in cognition
| 1999 IDs | Model 1 | Model 2 (adjusting for email status in 2011) | Model 3 (adjusting for frailty index in 2007) | Model 4 (adjusting for telomere length ~2000) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | p | β | p | β | p | β | p | |
| Age | ||||||||
| Adult ability | 0.110 | 0.074 | 0.102 | 0.108 | 0.103 | 0.087 | 0.101 | 0.114 |
| Percent dietary saturated fat | −0.104 | 0.063 | −0.102 | 0.068 | −0.099 | 0.075 | −0.103 | 0.083 |
| Leg extensor power | ||||||||
| Physical activity | 0.109 | 0.043 | 0.109 | 0.045 | 0.098 | 0.071 | 0.107 | 0.047 |
| Systolic blood pressure | −0.124 | 0.015 | −0.121 | 0.015 | −0.102 | 0.034 | −0.114 | 0.025 |
| Glucose level | ||||||||
| Diabetes status | ||||||||
| Email status (2011) | – | – | 0.069 | 0.557 | – | – | – | – |
| Frailty index (2007) | – | – | – | – | −0.104 | 0.098 | – | – |
| WC telomere length (qPCR) | 0.053 | 0.502 | ||||||
Age-related change was modelled using the ARC factor (first factor of change in 7 computerised neuropsychometric tests from the CANTAB battery, over 10 years). Reduced models contain only factors reaching a nominal p < 0.10). Missing values were imputed using multiple imputation. The ßs are all standardised, except in the cases of age and diabetes (dummy variable diabetic = 1, non-diabetic = 0). Text in bold indicates factors significant with Bonferroni correction. Where findings were in the opposite direction to expected, they are in italics. WC = White cell.
Paired t tests of ARC mean in LEP discordant pairs
| Discordant pairs | Mean ARC | Difference, one-tailed p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| stronger twin | weaker twin | ||
| All twins (n = 42) | 0.169 | −0.112 | 0.022 |
| DZ (n = 28) | 0.209 | −0.125 | 0.040 |
| MZ (n = 14) | 0.089 | −0.089 | 0.174 |
ARC = Age related-change in CANTAB performance over 10 years; LEP = LEP at baseline adjusted for birthweight, height and household income.
Fig. 1Age-related change in twins discordant for LEP. LEP discordance was defined as a difference of >1 SD. There were 28 DZ and 14 MZ twins. * p < 0.05, paired t test, one tailed.
Relationship between brain structures and age-related change
| Structures | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | p | β | p | β | p | |
| Total grey matter/ICV | 0.139 | 0.055 | 0.195 | 0.024 | 0.249 | 0.137 |
| Ventricles/ICV | −0.366 | <0.001 | −0.164 | 0.082 | −0.384 | 0.004 |
| Left MTL | 0.287 | <0.001 | 0.277 | 0.005 | 0.376 | 0.013 |
| Right MTL | 0.219 | 0.005 | 0.112 | 0.335 | 0.228 | 0.145 |
Rows represent separate models. ICV = Intracranial volume. Model 1–adjusted for age, adult ability, % saturated fat, LEP, physical activity and systolic blood pressure. Model 2–adjusted for age alone. Model 3–no adjustment.
Regional grey matter measures are adjusted for intracranial volume and brain folding during processing.
Relationship between LEP in 1999 and brain volumes in 2011
| Dependent variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β for LEP | p | β for LEP | p | β for LEP | p | |
| Ventricles/ICV | −0.030 | 0.853 | −0.167 | 0.224 | −0.161 | 0.209 |
| Total grey/ICV | 0.435 | 0.009 | 0.427 | 0.002 | 0.362 | 0.005 |
Standardised ßs are presented. Model 1–adjusting for birthweight, height and age. Model 2–adjusting for height and age. Model 3 - adjusting for age alone.
Total and regional brain volumes in 2011 in identical twin pairs discordant for LEP in 1999 (adjusted for birthweight)
| Structure | Mean weaker twin (LEP in 1999) | Mean stronger twin (LEP in 1999) | Difference | Paired t test, one-tailed p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ventricles/ICV | 0.523 | −0.016 | 0.540 | 0.025 |
| Total grey matter/ICV | −0.523 | 0.053 | −0.577 | 0.025 |
| Left MTL | 0.257 | −0.003 | 0.261 | 0.890 |
| Right MTL | 0.153 | −0.175 | 0.329 | 0.843 |
| Left middle frontal gyrus | 0.149 | 0.185 | −0.036 | 0.444 |
| Right middle frontal gyrus | 0.335 | 0.312 | 0.023 | 0.550 |
ICV = Intracranial volume. Volumes are expressed as standardized scores for the whole sample. A negative difference score indicates the weaker twins have on average smaller volumes; conversely, positive difference scores mean the weaker twins have larger volumes.
Clusters activating in the reaction time tasks
| Task Anatomical region | BA | FWE-corr voxel-wise p | Cluster size (voxels), kE | FWE-corr peak p | Uncorrected peak p | MNI coordinates | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | y | z | ||||||
| Choice RT task (unadjusted) | ||||||||
| R precentral | 6 | 0.335 | 1,410 | 0.735 | 5.20e–05 | 28 | −18 | 58 |
| R precentral | 6 | 0.979 | 2.79e–04 | 20 | −19 | 58 | ||
| R precuneus | 4/5 | 0.911 | 3.91e–04 | 10 | −40 | 64 | ||
| Choice RT task | ||||||||
| R precentral | 6 | 0.356 | 1,380 | 0.875 | 9.10e–05 | 28 | −18 | 58 |
| R precuneus | 4/5 | 0.997 | 4.90e–04 | 9 | −40 | 66 | ||
| R precentral | 6 | 0.997 | 5.16e–04 | 20 | −19 | 58 | ||
| Cued RT task (unadjusted) | ||||||||
| R precentral | 4 | 3.76e–05 | 9,551 | 0.459 | 2.06e–05 | 15 | −31 | 66 |
| L parietal superior | 5 | 0.530 | 2.82e–05 | −16 | −49 | 66 | ||
| R paracentral lobule | 4 | 0.767 | 7.78e–05 | 8 | −24 | 61 | ||
| Cued RT task | ||||||||
| L precentral | 4 | 5.44e–05 | 8,754 | 0.455 | 1.52e–05 | −30 | −31 | 64 |
| R precentral | 4 | 0.731 | 5.17e–05 | 15 | −31 | 66 | ||
| L parietal superior | 5 | 0.767 | 6.12e–05 | −16 | −49 | 66 | ||
Clusters listed where using a peak threshold of p < 0.01, cluster level p < 0.05 (uncorrected) and minimum extent 10 voxels. RT = Reaction time; BA = Brodmann area; FWE = family-wise error; MNI = Montreal Neurological Institute.
Adjusting for scanner cued RT.
Fig. 2Brain activation in 2011 during a cued reaction time task in stronger compared to weaker twins in 1999. Upper panel: Significantly increased brain activity in stronger twins (1999) during cued reaction times compared to the control condition. Coronal slices (posterior to anterior) are shown overlaid with the difference in BOLD signal coloured in red/yellow. Lower panel: Bar charts showing the BOLD contrast values per twin pair in the CuedRT relative to the control condition around the peak (6-mm sphere) in the right primary motor cortex peak (left) and the left superior parietal cortex (right).