Literature DB >> 26551496

Readmission rates and financial penalties after ear, nose and throat surgery: how can we improve?

J F Danino1, T Taylor2, C W Metcalfe2, S J Muzaffar3, A Sinha4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Since April 2011, all patient readmissions within 30 days have resulted in a financial penalty to the hospital trust, and therefore the responsible department. These costs may be substantial and potentially preventable.
METHODS: A service evaluation of readmissions within 30 days of discharge, over a 12-month period (January-December 2012), was performed in the ear, nose and throat department of a district general hospital, and findings were used as a basis to suggest areas for potential quality improvement. AIMS: To determine the number of readmissions, causes of readmission and resulting costs, and to explore how these readmissions may be prevented.
RESULTS: The departmental 30-day readmission rate over the study period was 3.12% (81/2606). The commonest causes of readmission (33.3%) were complications following tonsillectomy (27/81) such as pain, infection or bleeding. Over a third of these patients (30/81) were readmitted for less than 24 hours, with the average length of stay being less than 2.5 days. Financial implications: In 2011 the trust had 7526 emergency readmissions which were eligible for penalty within the 30-day time frame. This resulted in a loss of income of more than £60 000 to the ear, nose and throat department.
CONCLUSIONS: Optimizing postoperative care and improving patient understanding of common complications may reduce readmission rates, thus limiting the financial burden on the trust. These areas could serve as a basis for future quality improvement projects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26551496     DOI: 10.12968/hmed.2015.76.11.655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Hosp Med (Lond)        ISSN: 1750-8460            Impact factor:   0.825


  4 in total

1.  Associations between pre-, post-, and peri-operative variables and health resource use following surgery for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Hoda Badr; Maximiliano Sobrero; Joshua Chen; Tamar Kotz; Eric Genden; Andrew G Sikora; Brett Miles
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 5.337

2.  Validation of days at home as an outcome measure after surgery: a prospective cohort study in Australia.

Authors:  Paul S Myles; Mark A Shulman; Stephane Heritier; Sophie Wallace; David R McIlroy; Stuart McCluskey; Isabella Sillar; Andrew Forbes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Unplanned Hospital Readmission and Visit to the Emergency Room in the First Thirty Days after Head and Neck Surgery: A Prospective, Single-center Study.

Authors:  Carlos Miguel Chiesa-Estomba; Jon Alexander Sistiaga-Suárez; José Ángel González-García; Ekhiñe Larruscain Sarasola; Ariadna Valldeperes Vilanova; Xabier Altuna
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-08-04

4.  Did case-based payment influence surgical readmission rates in France? A retrospective study.

Authors:  Albert Vuagnat; Engin Yilmaz; Adrien Roussot; Victor Rodwin; Maryse Gadreau; Alain Bernard; Catherine Creuzot-Garcher; Catherine Quantin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.