Marian F MacDorman1, Uma M Reddy, Robert M Silver. 1. Maryland Population Research Center, University of Maryland, College Park, and the Pregnancy and Perinatology Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate stillbirth trends by gestational age. METHODS: National Center for Health Statistics' fetal death and live birth data files were used to analyze the 2006 and 2012 cohorts of deliveries and compute gestational age-specific stillbirth rates at 20 weeks of gestation or greater using two methods: traditional (eg, stillbirths at 38 weeks of gestation/live births and stillbirths at 38 weeks of gestation) and prospective (stillbirths at 38 weeks of gestation/number of women still pregnant at 38 weeks of gestation). Changes in rates and in the percent distribution of stillbirths and live births were assessed. RESULTS: In 2006 and 2012, the stillbirth rate was 6.05 stillbirths per 1,000 deliveries. There was little change in the percent distribution of stillbirths by gestational age from 2006 to 2012. However, the percent distribution of live births by gestational age changed considerably: births at 34-38 weeks of gestation decreased by 10-16%, and births at 39 weeks of gestation increased by 17%. Traditionally computed stillbirth rates were unchanged at most gestational ages, but rose at 24-27, 34-36, 37, and 38 weeks of gestation. However, rates were influenced by decreases in births at those gestational ages; the pattern of stillbirths by gestational age was unchanged. In contrast, there were no differences in prospective stillbirth rates at 21-42 weeks of gestation. CONCLUSION: The lack of change in prospective stillbirth rates from 2006 to 2012 suggests that preventing nonmedically indicated deliveries before 39 weeks of gestation did not increase the U.S. stillbirth rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate stillbirth trends by gestational age. METHODS: National Center for Health Statistics' fetal death and live birth data files were used to analyze the 2006 and 2012 cohorts of deliveries and compute gestational age-specific stillbirth rates at 20 weeks of gestation or greater using two methods: traditional (eg, stillbirths at 38 weeks of gestation/live births and stillbirths at 38 weeks of gestation) and prospective (stillbirths at 38 weeks of gestation/number of women still pregnant at 38 weeks of gestation). Changes in rates and in the percent distribution of stillbirths and live births were assessed. RESULTS: In 2006 and 2012, the stillbirth rate was 6.05 stillbirths per 1,000 deliveries. There was little change in the percent distribution of stillbirths by gestational age from 2006 to 2012. However, the percent distribution of live births by gestational age changed considerably: births at 34-38 weeks of gestation decreased by 10-16%, and births at 39 weeks of gestation increased by 17%. Traditionally computed stillbirth rates were unchanged at most gestational ages, but rose at 24-27, 34-36, 37, and 38 weeks of gestation. However, rates were influenced by decreases in births at those gestational ages; the pattern of stillbirths by gestational age was unchanged. In contrast, there were no differences in prospective stillbirth rates at 21-42 weeks of gestation. CONCLUSION: The lack of change in prospective stillbirth rates from 2006 to 2012 suggests that preventing nonmedically indicated deliveries before 39 weeks of gestation did not increase the U.S. stillbirth rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
Authors: Alexa A Freedman; Lauren M Kipling; Katie Labgold; Carmen J Marsit; Carol J Hogue; Augustine Rajakumar; Alicia K Smith; Halit Pinar; Deborah L Conway; Radek Bukowski; Michael W Varner; Robert L Goldenberg; Donald J Dudley; Carolyn Drews-Botsch Journal: Placenta Date: 2018-07-27 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Holly Elser; Alison Gemmill; Joan A Casey; Deborah Karasek; Tim Bruckner; Jonathan A Mayo; Henry C Lee; David K Stevenson; Gary M Shaw; Ralph Catalano Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2020-07-08 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Karen J Gibbins; Robert M Silver; Halit Pinar; Uma M Reddy; Corette B Parker; Vanessa Thorsten; Marian Willinger; Donald J Dudley; Radek Bukowski; George R Saade; Matthew A Koch; Deborah Conway; Carol J Hogue; Barbara J Stoll; Robert L Goldenberg Journal: Placenta Date: 2016-05-07 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Juan M Lavista Ferres; Tatiana M Anderson; Richard Johnston; Jan-Marino Ramirez; Edwin A Mitchell Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2019-12-09 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Annelee Boyle; Jessica P Preslar; Carol J R Hogue; Robert M Silver; Uma M Reddy; Robert L Goldenberg; Barbara J Stoll; Michael W Varner; Deborah L Conway; George R Saade; Radek Bukowski; Donald J Dudley Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Elizabeth Wall-Wieler; Suzan L Carmichael; Ronald S Gibbs; Deirdre J Lyell; Anna I Girsen; Yasser Y El-Sayed; Alexander J Butwick Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Julia C Phillippi; Jeremy L Neal; Nicole S Carlson; Frances M Biel; Jonathan M Snowden; Ellen L Tilden Journal: J Midwifery Womens Health Date: 2017-08-11 Impact factor: 2.388