Literature DB >> 26551175

A Multi-State Analysis of Early-Term Delivery Trends and the Association With Term Stillbirth.

Sarah E Little1, Chloe A Zera, Mark A Clapp, Louise Wilkins-Haug, Julian N Robinson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether reduction in early-term deliveries was associated with increasing rates of term stillbirth.
METHODS: This is a retrospective descriptive analysis of variation in term delivery timing and stillbirth from 2005 to 2011 based on birth certificate and fetal death data. Early-term deliveries (37 0/7-38 6/7 weeks of gestation) as a percentage of total term delivery and term stillbirth rates were calculated for each state, both overall and for low- and high-risk women. We analyzed whether state-level changes in early-term deliveries and term stillbirth were correlated using Pearson correlation coefficients. States were also categorized as high or low reduction (above or below the national average) and changes in stillbirth rates for these groups were analyzed using a Cochrane-Armitage test for linear trend.
RESULTS: There was a decline in early-term deliveries across the United States: 1,123,467 of 3,533,233 term, singleton births occurred in the early term in 2005 (31.8%) as compared with 978,294 of 3,429,172 (28.5%) in 2011. Reductions varied widely by state. There was no change in the term stillbirth rate (123/100,000 births in 2005 compared with 130/100,000 in 2011; P=.189) nor change in the high reduction states alone. There was no correlation between state-level changes in early-term deliveries and term stillbirth. There was an increase in term stillbirths among women with diabetes (from 238/100,000 to 300/100,000 births; P=.010), independent of changes in early-term delivery timing.
CONCLUSION: The reduction in early-term deliveries across the United States between 2005 and 2011 was not associated with an increase in the rate of term stillbirth. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26551175     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  6 in total

1.  A Statewide Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Non-Medically Indicated Scheduled Deliveries.

Authors:  Marilyn A Kacica; J Christopher Glantz; Kuangnan Xiong; Eileen P Shields; Peter H Cherouny
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-04

2.  Temporal Trends in Late Preterm and Early Term Birth Rates in 6 High-Income Countries in North America and Europe and Association With Clinician-Initiated Obstetric Interventions.

Authors:  Jennifer L Richards; Michael S Kramer; Paromita Deb-Rinker; Jocelyn Rouleau; Laust Mortensen; Mika Gissler; Nils-Halvdan Morken; Rolv Skjærven; Sven Cnattingius; Stefan Johansson; Marie Delnord; Siobhan M Dolan; Naho Morisaki; Suzanne Tough; Jennifer Zeitlin; Michael R Kramer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  What we have learned about scheduling elective repeat cesarean delivery at term.

Authors:  Alan T N Tita
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 3.300

4.  Optimal timing for elective caesarean delivery in a Chinese population: a large hospital-based retrospective cohort study in Shanghai.

Authors:  Yong Hu; Hong Shen; Mark B Landon; Weiwei Cheng; Xiaohua Liu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Is a 'guideline-compliant' primary cesarean delivery associated with a modified risk for maternal and neonatal morbidity?: a clinical evaluation of the 2014 ACOG/SMFM obstetric care consensus statement.

Authors:  Andrew W White; Charis N Chambers; Michelle C Ertel; Taylor R Gennaro; Ling Chen; Alexander M Friedman; Kacey Y Eichelberger
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-08-22       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Gestational age, mode of birth and breastmilk feeding all influence acute early childhood gastroenteritis: a record-linkage cohort study.

Authors:  Jason P Bentley; Judy M Simpson; Jenny R Bowen; Jonathan M Morris; Christine L Roberts; Natasha Nassar
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.125

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.