Darshan H Mehta1, Giselle K Perez2, Lara Traeger3, Elyse R Park4, Roberta E Goldman5, Vivian Haime5, Eva H Chittenden6, John W Denninger7, Vicki A Jackson6. 1. Benson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Electronic address: dmehta@mgh.harvard.edu. 2. Mongan Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3. Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 4. Benson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Mongan Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5. Benson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 6. Division of Palliative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 7. Benson-Henry Institute for Mind Body Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Palliative care clinicians (PCCs) are vulnerable to burnout as a result of chronic stress related to working with seriously ill patients. Burnout can lead to absenteeism, ineffective communication, medical errors, and job turnover. Interventions that promote better coping with stress are needed in this population. OBJECTIVES: This pilot study tested the feasibility of the Relaxation Response Resiliency Program for Palliative Care Clinicians, a program targeted to decrease stress and increase resiliency, in a multidisciplinary cohort of PCCs (N = 16) at a major academic medical center. METHODS: A physician delivered the intervention over two months in five sessions (12 hours total). Data were collected the week before the program start and two months after completion. The main outcome was feasibility of the program. Changes in perceived stress, positive and negative affect, perspective taking, optimism, satisfaction with life, and self-efficacy were examined using nonparametric statistical tests. Effect size was quantified using Cohen's d. RESULTS: The intervention was feasible; all participants attended at least four of the five sessions, and there was no attrition. After the intervention, participants showed reductions in perceived stress and improvements in perspective taking. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that a novel team-based resiliency intervention based on elicitation of the relaxation response was feasible and may help promote resiliency and protect against the negative consequences of stress for PCCs.
CONTEXT: Palliative care clinicians (PCCs) are vulnerable to burnout as a result of chronic stress related to working with seriously ill patients. Burnout can lead to absenteeism, ineffective communication, medical errors, and job turnover. Interventions that promote better coping with stress are needed in this population. OBJECTIVES: This pilot study tested the feasibility of the Relaxation Response Resiliency Program for Palliative Care Clinicians, a program targeted to decrease stress and increase resiliency, in a multidisciplinary cohort of PCCs (N = 16) at a major academic medical center. METHODS: A physician delivered the intervention over two months in five sessions (12 hours total). Data were collected the week before the program start and two months after completion. The main outcome was feasibility of the program. Changes in perceived stress, positive and negative affect, perspective taking, optimism, satisfaction with life, and self-efficacy were examined using nonparametric statistical tests. Effect size was quantified using Cohen's d. RESULTS: The intervention was feasible; all participants attended at least four of the five sessions, and there was no attrition. After the intervention, participants showed reductions in perceived stress and improvements in perspective taking. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that a novel team-based resiliency intervention based on elicitation of the relaxation response was feasible and may help promote resiliency and protect against the negative consequences of stress for PCCs.
Authors: Krista L Harrison; Elizabeth Dzeng; Christine S Ritchie; Tait D Shanafelt; Arif H Kamal; Janet H Bull; Jon C Tilburt; Keith M Swetz Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2017-02-11 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Zeina Chemali; Christina P C Borba; Kelsey Johnson; Rebecca S Hock; Lindsey Parnarouskis; David C Henderson; Gregory L Fricchione Journal: Med Confl Surviv Date: 2017-05-12
Authors: Karen A Kuhlthau; Christina M Luberto; Lara Traeger; Rachel A Millstein; Giselle K Perez; Olivia J Lindly; Emma Chad-Friedman; Jacqueline Proszynski; Elyse R Park Journal: J Autism Dev Disord Date: 2020-07
Authors: Carolina Lavin Venegas; Miriam N Nkangu; Melissa C Duffy; Dean A Fergusson; Edward G Spilg Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-01-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Elyse R Park; Louisa G Sylvia; Joanna M Streck; Christina M Luberto; Amelia M Stanton; Giselle K Perez; Margaret Baim; Cayley C Bliss; Mary Susan Convery; Sydney Crute; John W Denninger; Karen Donelan; Michelle L Dossett; Maurizio Fava; Stacie Fredriksson; Gregory Fricchione; Nevita George; Daniel L Hall; Betsy Remington Hart; John Herman; April Hirschberg; Daphne Holt; Sara E Looby; Laura Malloy; Jocelyn Meek; Darshan H Mehta; Rachel A Millstein; Helen Mizrach; Katherine Rosa; Ellen Slawsby; A Clare Stupinski; Lara Traeger; Rachel Vanderkruik; Christine Vogeli; Sabine Wilhelm Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2020-11-02 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Zeina Chemali; Hannah Smati; Kelsey Johnson; Christina P C Borba; Gregory L Fricchione Journal: Confl Health Date: 2018-02-26 Impact factor: 2.723