Literature DB >> 26550911

Characterization of emissions from a desktop 3D printer and indoor air measurements in office settings.

Patrick Steinle1.   

Abstract

Emissions from a desktop 3D printer based on fused deposition modeling (FDM) technology were measured in a test chamber and indoor air was monitored in office settings. Ultrafine aerosol (UFA) emissions were higher while printing a standard object with polylactic acid (PLA) than with acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) polymer (2.1 × 10(9) vs. 2.4 × 10(8) particles/min). Prolonged use of the printer led to higher emission rates (factor 2 with PLA and 4 with ABS, measured after seven months of occasional use). UFA consisted mainly of volatile droplets, and some small (100-300 nm diameter) iron containing and soot-like particles were found. Emissions of inhalable and respirable dust were below the limit of detection (LOD) when measured gravimetrically, and only slightly higher than background when measured with an aerosol spectrometer. Emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOC) were in the range of 10 µg/min. Styrene accounted for more than 50% of total VOC emitted when printing with ABS; for PLA, methyl methacrylate (MMA, 37% of TVOC) was detected as the predominant compound. Two polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), fluoranthene and pyrene, were observed in very low amounts. All other analyzed PAH, as well as inorganic gases and metal emissions except iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn), were below the LOD or did not differ from background without printing. A single 3D print (165 min) in a large, well-ventilated office did not significantly increase the UFA and VOC concentrations, whereas these were readily detectable in a small, unventilated room, with UFA concentrations increasing by 2,000 particles/cm(3) and MMA reaching a peak of 21 µg/m(3) and still being detectable in the room even 20 hr after printing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fused deposition modeling; indoor; office; ultrafine aerosols; volatile organic compounds

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26550911     DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2015.1091957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  23 in total

1.  Particle and organic vapor emissions from children's 3-D pen and 3-D printer toys.

Authors:  Jinghai Yi; Matthew G Duling; Lauren N Bowers; Alycia K Knepp; Ryan F LeBouf; Timothy R Nurkiewicz; Anand Ranpara; Todd Luxton; Stephen B Martin; Dru A Burns; Derek M Peloquin; Eric J Baumann; M Abbas Virji; Aleksandr B Stefaniak
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 2.  Assessment of environmental and ergonomic hazard associated to printing and photocopying: a review.

Authors:  Abhishek Nandan; N A Siddiqui; Pankaj Kumar
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  Characterization of chemical contaminants generated by a desktop fused deposition modeling 3-dimensional Printer.

Authors:  Aleksandr B Stefaniak; Ryan F LeBouf; Jinghai Yi; Jason Ham; Timothy Nurkewicz; Diane E Schwegler-Berry; Bean T Chen; J Raymond Wells; Matthew G Duling; Robert B Lawrence; Stephen B Martin; Alyson R Johnson; M Abbas Virji
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Comparative analysis of ventilation efficiency on ultrafine particle removal in university MakerSpaces.

Authors:  Lynn E Secondo; Hayat I Adawi; John Cuddehe; Kenneth Hopson; Allison Schumacher; Larry Mendoza; Charles Cartin; Nastassja A Lewinski
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  Particle emissions from fused deposition modeling 3D printers: Evaluation and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peter Byrley; Barbara Jane George; William K Boyes; Kim Rogers
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Particle and vapor emissions from vat polymerization desktop-scale 3-dimensional printers.

Authors:  A B Stefaniak; L N Bowers; A K Knepp; T P Luxton; D M Peloquin; E J Baumann; J E Ham; J R Wells; A R Johnson; R F LeBouf; F-C Su; S B Martin; M A Virji
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  VOC Emissions and Formation Mechanisms from Carbon Nanotube Composites during 3D Printing.

Authors:  Phillip M Potter; Souhail R Al-Abed; Dean Lay; Slawomir M Lomnicki
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and polycarbonate (PC) filaments three-dimensional (3-D) printer emissions-induced cell toxicity.

Authors:  Mariana T Farcas; Aleksandr B Stefaniak; Alycia K Knepp; Lauren Bowers; William K Mandler; Michael Kashon; Stephen R Jackson; Todd A Stueckle; Jenifer D Sisler; Sherri A Friend; Chaolong Qi; Duane R Hammond; Treye A Thomas; Joanna Matheson; Vincent Castranova; Yong Qian
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 4.372

9.  Evaluation of emissions and exposures at workplaces using desktop 3-dimensional printer.

Authors:  A B Stefaniak; A R Johnson; S du Preez; D R Hammond; J R Wells; J E Ham; R F LeBouf; K W Menchaca; S B Martin; M G Duling; L N Bowers; A K Knepp; F C Su; D J de Beer; J L du Plessis
Journal:  J Chem Health Saf       Date:  2019-03

10.  Additive Manufacturing for Occupational Hygiene: A Comprehensive Review of Processes, Emissions, & Exposures.

Authors:  A B Stefaniak; S Du Preez; J L Du Plessis
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 6.393

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.