Literature DB >> 26550337

Clinical comparison of Zero-profile interbody fusion device and anterior cervical plate interbody fusion in treating cervical spondylosis.

Bin Yan1, Lin Nie2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: the aim of the study was to compare the clinical effect of Zero-profile interbody fusion device (Zero-P) with anterior cervical plate interbody fusion system (PCB) in treating cervical spondylosis.
METHODS: a total of 98 patients with cervical spondylosis (110 segments) in February 2011 to January 2013 were included in our hospital. All participants were randomly divided into observation group and control group with 49 cases in each group. The observation group was treated with Zero-P, while the control group received PCB treatment. Comparison of the two groups in neurological function score (JOA), pain visual analogue scale (VAS), the neck disability index (NDI), quality of life score (SF-36) and cervical curvature (Cobb angle) change were recorded and analyzed before and after treatment.
RESULTS: The observation group was found with 90% excellent and good rate, which was higher than that of the control group (80%). Dysphagia rate in observational group was 16.33% (8/49), which was significantly less than that in control group (46.94%). Operation time and bleeding volume in the observation group was less than those in control group. Postoperative improvements of JOA score, VAS score, and NDI in observational group were also significantly better than that in control group (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: The clinical effect of Zero-P and PCB for the treatment of cervical spondylosis was quite fair, but Zero-P showed a better therapeutic effect with improvement of life quality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical spine; Zero-profile device; anterior; intervertebral fusion; plate

Year:  2015        PMID: 26550337      PMCID: PMC4613022     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med        ISSN: 1940-5901


  10 in total

1.  Biomechanics of an integrated interbody device versus ACDF anterior locking plate in a single-level cervical spine fusion construct.

Authors:  Matthew I Stein; Aniruddh N Nayak; Roger B Gaskins; Andres F Cabezas; Brandon G Santoni; Antonio E Castellvi
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Zero-profile hybrid fusion construct versus 2-level plate fixation to treat adjacent-level disease in the cervical spine.

Authors:  Andrew T Healy; Swetha J Sundar; Raul J Cardenas; Prasath Mageswaran; Edward C Benzel; Thomas E Mroz; Todd B Francis
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2014-08-29

3.  Clinical and radiologic comparison of dynamic cervical implant arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  Zhonghai Li; Shunzhi Yu; Yantao Zhao; Shuxun Hou; Qiang Fu; Fengning Li; Tiesheng Hou; Hongbin Zhong
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 1.961

4.  Osteoinductive activity of ErhBMP-2 after anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion with a ß-TCP interbody cage in a goat model.

Authors:  Hongli Wang; Fan Zhang; Feizhou Lv; Jianyuan Jiang; Dayong Liu; Xinlei Xia
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.390

5.  The application of zero-profile anchored spacer in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Zhiwen Wang; Weimin Jiang; Xuefeng Li; Heng Wang; Jinhui Shi; Jie Chen; Bin Meng; Huilin Yang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a zero-profile integrated plate and spacer device: a clinical and radiological study: Clinical article.

Authors:  Innocent Njoku; Marjan Alimi; Lewis Z Leng; Benjamin J Shin; Andrew R James; Sandeep Bhangoo; Apostolos John Tsiouris; Roger Härtl
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2014-08-08

Review 7.  Zero-P: a new zero-profile cage-plate device for single and multilevel ACDF. A single institution series with four years maximum follow-up and review of the literature on zero-profile devices.

Authors:  Giuseppe M V Barbagallo; Dario Romano; Francesco Certo; Pietro Milone; Vincenzo Albanese
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  The application of a zero-profile implant in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Zhi-dong Wang; Ruo-fu Zhu; Hui-lin Yang; Min-feng Gan; Shi-kai Zhang; Min-jie Shen; Chao Chen; Quan Yuan
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 1.961

9.  Surgical Outcome of a Zero-profile Device Comparing with Stand-alone Cage and Anterior Cervical Plate with Iliac Bone Graft in the Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Authors:  Jae Sik Shin; Sung Han Oh; Pyoung Goo Cho
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2014-09-30

10.  Comparative study of clinical and radiological outcomes of a zero-profile device concerning reduced postoperative Dysphagia after single level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Doo Kyung Son; Dong Wuk Son; Ho Sang Kim; Soon Ki Sung; Sang Weon Lee; Geun Sung Song
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2014-08-31
  10 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  Locking stand-alone cage versus anterior plate construct in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yachao Zhao; Sidong Yang; Yachong Huo; Zhaohui Li; Dalong Yang; Wenyuan Ding
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Zero-profile anchored cage reduces risk of postoperative dysphagia compared with cage with plate fixation after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  ShanWen Xiao; ZhuDe Liang; Wu Wei; JinPei Ning
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Improved Dysphagia Outcomes in Anchored Spacers Versus Plate-Screw Systems in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mostafa A Gabr; Elisabeth Touko; Amol P Yadav; Isaac Karikari; C Rory Goodwin; Michael W Groff; Luis Ramirez; Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-12-26

4.  Cervical spine alignment and clinical outcomes after multilevel anterior cervical decompression and fusion with or without plate: A minimal 5-year follow-up of a CONSORT-compliant article.

Authors:  Yan Liang; Shuai Xu; Guanjie Yu; Zhenqi Zhu; Haiying Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Pulled-out locking screw re-screwed spontaneously in anterior cervical decompression and fusion with the zero-profile implant system: A case report.

Authors:  Yi Yang; Lingli Li; Litai Ma; Junfeng Zeng; Tingkui Wu; Hao Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 6.  Anterior Techniques in Managing Cervical Disc Disease.

Authors:  Lily H Kim; Marissa D'Souza; Allen L Ho; Arjun V Pendharkar; Eric S Sussman; Paymon Rezaii; Atman Desai
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-08-14

7.  Locking Stand-Alone Cage Constructs for the Treatment of Cervical Spine Degenerative Disease.

Authors:  Roberto Alfonso De Leo-Vargas; Ildefonso Muñoz-Romero; Michel Gustavo Mondragón-Soto; Jaime Jesús Martínez-Anda
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2019-04-10

Review 8.  Comparison of outcomes between Zero-p implant and anterior cervical plate interbody fusion systems for anterior cervical decompression and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Tingxin Zhang; Nana Guo; Gang Gao; Hao Liu; Yanhong Li; Feng Gao; Qingxin Zhang; Xiaoyang Tao; Wupeng Yang; Yongjiang Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 9.  Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using Zero-P System for Treatment of Cervical Spondylosis: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zhaoyang Guo; Xiaolin Wu; Shuai Yang; Chang Liu; Youfu Zhu; Nana Shen; Zhu Guo; Weiliang Su; Yan Wang; Bohua Chen; Hongfei Xiang
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.037

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.