Literature DB >> 26550145

Modified and systematically-designed installation procedure for spinal cord stimulation in the decubitus position under local anesthesia: a introductory technical case report.

Sumihisa Orita1, Yasuhiro Shiga1, Kazuki Fujimoto1, Takeshi Sainoh1, Go Kubota1, Kazuhide Inage1, Jun Sato1, Kazuyo Yamauchi1, Yasuchika Aoki2, Junichi Nakamura1, Yusuke Matsuura1, Takane Suzuki3, Kazuhisa Takahashi1, Seiji Ohtori1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is sometimes preferable in some refractory chronic lower back pain (LBP) pathologies. SCS involves an insertion of electrode leads into the epidural space in the prone position under local anesthesia, followed by neurostimulator implantation under local/general anesthesia. These continuous procedures can cause transient post-operative LBP exacerbation and to make temporary pockets that will store redundant leads in it with some risk of subcutaneous irritation and infection in addition to making extra incisions. We introduce a modified simpler method for SCS implantation, systematically designed to be performed only under local anesthesia in a decubitus, non-prone position.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An 81-year-old patient with FBSS was treated. A physician was able to insert SCS leads with ease while the patient was in a decubitus position. The patient was comfortable, under totally local anesthesia, and the procedure produced no extra subcutaneous pockets. RESULT: The patient felt almost no LBP and reported no pain exacerbation during the operation. The SCS installation provided the patient with great improvement in both her lower back (NRS from 8 to 0-1) and leg (from 7 to 2) pain with a great improvement in her daily life activities. No adverse events were observed during the perioperative period.
CONCLUSION: The modified SCS insertion method enabled us to achieve both intraoperative pain relief and complete SCS implantation in a minimally invasive manner.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Spinal cord stimulation (SCS); decubitus position; failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS); less invasive; lower back pain (LBP)

Year:  2015        PMID: 26550145      PMCID: PMC4612830     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med        ISSN: 1940-5901


  13 in total

1.  Spinal cord stimulation for failed back surgery syndrome: a decision-analytic model and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca J Taylor; Rod S Taylor
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Minimally invasive placement of epidural plate electrodes under local anaesthesia in spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  T Beems; R T M van Dongen
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2007

Review 3.  Present and potential use of spinal cord stimulation to control chronic pain.

Authors:  Jason J Song; Adrian Popescu; Russell L Bell
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Spinal cord stimulation for axial low back pain: a prospective, controlled trial comparing dual with single percutaneous electrodes.

Authors:  Richard B North; David H Kidd; John Olin; Jeffrey M Sieracki; Farrokh Farrokhi; Loredana Petrucci; Protagoras N Cutchis
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Spinal cord stimulation versus reoperation for failed back surgery syndrome: a prospective, randomized study design.

Authors:  R B North; D H Kidd; S Piantadosi
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  1995

Review 6.  Minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome.

Authors:  P Mavrocordatos; A Cahana
Journal:  Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg       Date:  2006

7.  Spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management for neuropathic pain: a multicentre randomised controlled trial in patients with failed back surgery syndrome.

Authors:  Krishna Kumar; Rod S Taylor; Line Jacques; Sam Eldabe; Mario Meglio; Joan Molet; Simon Thomson; Jim O'Callaghan; Elon Eisenberg; Germain Milbouw; Eric Buchser; Gianpaolo Fortini; Jonathan Richardson; Richard B North
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Spinal cord stimulation for failed back surgery syndrome.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Leveque; Alan T Villavicencio; Ketan R Bulsara; Linda Rubin; John P Gorecki
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2001-01

9.  Avoiding complications from spinal cord stimulation: practical recommendations from an international panel of experts.

Authors:  Krishna Kumar; Eric Buchser; Bengt Linderoth; Mario Meglio; Jean-Pierre Van Buyten
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2007-01

10.  Spinal cord stimulation for predominant low back pain in failed back surgery syndrome: study protocol for an international multicenter randomized controlled trial (PROMISE study).

Authors:  Philippe Rigoard; Mehul J Desai; Richard B North; Rod S Taylor; Lieven Annemans; Christine Greening; Ye Tan; Carine Van den Abeele; Jane Shipley; Krishna Kumar
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.