Literature DB >> 26550111

Anticoagulant therapies versus heparin for the prevention of hemodialysis catheter-related complications: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.

Jinrui Liu1, Chang'an Wang1, Hongfei Zhao2, Jinghua Zhang1, Jie Ma3, Yuanyuan Hou4, Hongbin Zou3.   

Abstract

Locking of central venous catheters with heparin is an accepted practice to maintain catheter patency between dialysis sessions. However, this practice may cause other adverse reactions. Although many studies suggest benefits of other catheter lock solutions over heparin on these grounds, no consensus has been reached for clinical practice. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed of randomized controlled trials (RCT) that compared antimicrobial-containing or citrate-alone catheter lock solutions with heparin alone in patients undergoing hemodialysis with central venous catheters. Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from EMBASE, and PubMed were searched for articles published through June 2014. The primary outcomes were catheter-related bacteremia (CRB) and catheter malfunction (CM). The secondary outcomes were bleeding, exit-site infection (ESI), clinical sepsis, and all-cause mortality. Seventeen RCTs met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed that antimicrobial-containing and citrate-alone lock solutions were superior to heparin for preventing CRB (both P < 0.01). Although antimicrobial-containing lock solutions significantly affected clinical sepsis (P < 0.01), they did not affect ESI, bleeding, or all-cause mortality. Incidence of CM episodes was lower in patients receiving antibiotics + heparin and gentamicin + citrate (both P < 0.05), while other antimicrobial-containing and citrate-alone lock solutions showed no difference. Only citrate-alone lock solutions significantly decreased bleeding and ESI episodes (both P < 0.05). Compared with heparin, antimicrobial-containing lock solutions more effectively prevent CRB and clinical sepsis. Antibiotics + heparin and gentamicin + citrate solutions showing better prevention of CM. Citrate-alone lock solutions result in fewer CRB, bleeding and ESI episodes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Catheter lock solutions; hemodialysis; heparin; meta-analysis

Year:  2015        PMID: 26550111      PMCID: PMC4612796     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med        ISSN: 1940-5901


  34 in total

Review 1.  Trisodium citrate: an alternative to unfractionated heparin for hemodialysis catheter dwells.

Authors:  Dwayne A Pierce; Michael V Rocco
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.705

Review 2.  Citrate versus heparin lock for hemodialysis catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yuliang Zhao; Zheng Li; Ling Zhang; Jiqiao Yang; Yingying Yang; Yi Tang; Ping Fu
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 8.860

3.  Sodium citrate 4% locking solution for central venous dialysis catheters--an effective, more cost-efficient alternative to heparin.

Authors:  Linda Grudzinski; Patricia Quinan; Sophie Kwok; Andreas Pierratos
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 4.  Use of vancomycin-containing lock or flush solutions for prevention of bloodstream infection associated with central venous access devices: a meta-analysis of prospective, randomized trials.

Authors:  Nasia Safdar; Dennis G Maki
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Enhancing the survival of tunneled haemodialysis catheters using an antibiotic lock in the elderly: a randomised, double-blind clinical trial.

Authors:  Anil K Saxena; Bodh R Panhotra; Dasappan S Sundaram; Mohammed Naguib Fahmy Morsy; Ali M Al-Arabi Al-Ghamdi
Journal:  Nephrology (Carlton)       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  A randomized trial comparing gentamicin/citrate and heparin locks for central venous catheters in maintenance hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  John Moran; Sumi Sun; Ishrag Khababa; Alexander Pedan; Sheila Doss; Brigitte Schiller
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 7.  [Central venous catheter lock to prevent thrombosis and bacterial infection].

Authors:  Salvatore Mandolfo
Journal:  G Ital Nefrol       Date:  2012 May-Jun

8.  A phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of tenecteplase for improvement of hemodialysis catheter function: TROPICS 3.

Authors:  James Tumlin; Jesse Goldman; David M Spiegel; David Roer; K Adu Ntoso; Martha Blaney; Joan Jacobs; Barbara S Gillespie; Susan M Begelman
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Sodium citrate versus heparin catheter locks for cuffed central venous catheters: a single-center randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Albert Power; Neill Duncan; Seema K Singh; Wendy Brown; Elizabeth Dalby; Claire Edwards; Kathleen Lynch; Virginia Prout; Tom Cairns; Megan Griffith; Adam McLean; Andrew Palmer; David Taube
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 8.860

10.  Tissue plasminogen activator versus heparin for locking dialysis catheters: A systematic review.

Authors:  Belal M Firwana; Rim Hasan; Mazen Ferwana; Joseph Varon; Aaron Stern; Umesh Gidwani
Journal:  Avicenna J Med       Date:  2011-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of high-flux hemodialysis with hemodialysis filtration in treatment of uraemic pruritus: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Xia Jiang; Fen Ji; Zhi-Wei Chen; Qiao-Lin Huang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.370

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.