Literature DB >> 26549866

Innominate and Axillary Cannulation in Aortic Arch Surgery Provide Similar Neuroprotection.

Michael W A Chu1, Katie L Losenno2, Jill J Gelinas2, Vinay Garg3, Jeff Dickson3, Alana Harrington3, Subodh Verma3, Mark D Peterson3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Contemporaneous trends in cerebral protection during aortic arch surgery include moderate hypothermia (22°C-28°C) and continuous antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP). Innominate artery cannulation is a simplified, alternative route for ACP; however, clinical outcomes have yet to be evaluated against the gold standard of axillary cannulation.
METHODS: Between 2008 and 2015, 140 consecutive patients underwent hemiarch reconstruction with moderate hypothermia and continuous ACP at 2 institutions. Axillary cannulation was used in 74 patients (31.1% female, 64.8 ± 12.7 years) and the remaining 66 patients (24.2% female, 60.8 ± 10.5 years) had direct cannulation of the innominate artery for delivery of ACP.
RESULTS: Although there were no statistically significant differences in complications, neurological events were almost twice as frequent in innominate (19.7%) than in axillary (10.8%; P = 0.142) whereas prolonged mechanical ventilation was much more common with axillary (17.6%) vs innominate (7.6%; P = 0.078). There were no mortalities in the axillary group and 1 in the innominate group (0% vs 1.5%; P > 0.471) and no statistically significant differences in any other postoperative complications or hospital length of stay. There was a reduction in total operating room time in the innominate group (axillary 454 ± 115 minutes, innominate 318 ± 125 minutes; P < 0.001), and in the matched subgroup analysis of patients who underwent Bentall and hemiarch reconstruction (axillary 456 ± 109 minutes, innominate 370 ± 106 minutes; P = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: Axillary and innominate artery cannulation for ACP during proximal aortic arch reconstructive surgery resulted in similarly excellent neurological outcomes. Innominate artery cannulation might reduce total surgical time. Possible clinically relevant differences in neurological and respiratory complications require assessment in randomized controlled trials.
Copyright © 2016 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26549866     DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Cardiol        ISSN: 0828-282X            Impact factor:   5.223


  4 in total

1.  Innominate vs. Axillary Artery Cannulation in Aortic Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Amer Harky; Jeffrey Sk Chan; Christiana Bithas; Alexander Hof; Monira Sharif; Saied Froghi; Mohamad Bashir
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr

2.  Direct proximal right subclavian artery cannulation during surgery of the thoracic aorta.

Authors:  Tommaso Regesta; Corrado Cavozza; Antonio Campanella; Pasquale Pellegrino; Riccardo Gherli; Giulia Maj; Andrea Audo
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-04-27

3.  Axillary versus innominate artery cannulation for antegrade cerebral perfusion in aortic surgery: design of the Aortic Surgery Cerebral Protection Evaluation (ACE) CardioLink-3 randomised trial.

Authors:  Vinay Garg; Mark D Peterson; Michael Wa Chu; Maral Ouzounian; Roderick Gg MacArthur; John Bozinovski; Ismail El-Hamamsy; F Victor Chu; Ankit Garg; Judith Hall; Kevin E Thorpe; Natasha Dhingra; Hwee Teoh; Thomas R Marotta; David A Latter; Adrian Quan; Muhammad Mamdani; Peter Juni; C David Mazer; Subodh Verma
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  A simple method to establish antegrade cerebral perfusion during hemiarch reconstruction.

Authors:  Stephane Leung Wai Sang; Tyler J Beute; Tomasz Timek
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2020-04-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.