| Literature DB >> 26549503 |
Hyojung Lee1, Hyo Jin Lee1, Ji Yeon Kim2, Oran Kwon1.
Abstract
This study first investigated the effects of corn gluten hydrolysate (CGH) (1.5 g/day) administration for 7 days on appetite-responsive genes in lean Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. In a second set of experiments, the metabolic changes occurring at multiple time points over 8 weeks in response to CGH (35.33% wt/wt) were observed in high-fat (HF, 60% of energy as fat) diet-fed SD rats. In lean rats, the hypothalamus neuropeptide-Y and proopiomelanocortin mRNA levels of the CGH group were significantly changed in response to CGH administration. In the second part of the study, CGH treatment was found to reduce body weight and perirenal and epididymal fat weight. CGH also prevented an increase in food intake at 2 weeks and lowered plasma leptin and insulin levels in comparison with the HF group. This reduction in the plasma and hepatic lipid levels was followed by improved insulin resistance, and the beneficial metabolic effects of CGH were also partly related to increases in plasma adiponectin levels. The Homeostasis Model of Assessment - Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), an index of insulin resistance, was markedly improved in the HF-CGH group compared with the HF group at 6 weeks. According to the microarray results, adipose tissue mRNA expression related to G-protein coupled receptor protein signaling pathway and sensory perception was significantly improved after 8 weeks of CGH administration. In conclusion, the present findings suggest that dietary CGH may be effective for improving hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia and insulin resistance in diet-induced obese rats as well as appetite control in lean rats.Entities:
Keywords: corn gluten hydrolysates; food intake; leptin; lipid metabolism; obesity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26549503 PMCID: PMC4696995 DOI: 10.14348/molcells.2015.0107
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Cells ISSN: 1016-8478 Impact factor: 5.034
Composition of experimental diet (Unit: g/kg diet)
| Ingredients | Group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| NF | HF | HF-CGH | |
| Corn starch | 397.49 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Dextrinized corn starch | 132.00 | 149.76 | 63.00 |
| Sucrose | 100.00 | 102.11 | 102.11 |
| Casein (>85% protein) | 200.00 | 272.29 | 0.00 |
| Corn gluten hydrolysate (CGH) | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Soybean Oil | 70.00 | 95.30 | 101.0 |
| Lard | 0.00 | 243.70 | 230.0 |
| Fiber | 50.00 | 68.07 | 60.0 |
| Mineral mix | 35.00 | 47.65 | 41.0 |
| Vitamin mix | 10.00 | 13.61 | 12.0 |
| L-Cystine | 3.00 | 4.08 | 3.5 |
| Choline bitartrate | 2.50 | 3.40 | 2.9 |
| 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.0 | |
| Total amount | 1,000.0 | 1,000.0 | 1,000.0 |
| Total Calorie (kcal) | 3737.61 | 5088.80 | 5168.29 |
| Carbohydrates (% as kcal) | 64 | 21 | 21 |
| Protein (% as kcal) | 19 | 19 | 19 |
| Fat (% as kcal) | 17 | 60 | 60 |
Control, AIN-93G diet; NF, normal fat control; HF, high fat control; HF-CGH, high fat with CGH as a protein source
Mineral mix (AIN-93G) (g/kg mixture): anhydrous calcium carbonate 357, monobasic potassium phosphate 196, sodium chloride 74, potassium sulfate 46.6, tripotassium citrate monohydrate 70.78, magnesium oxide 24, ferric citrate 6.06, zinc carbonate 1.65, manganese carbonate 0.63, cupric carbonate 0.3, potassium iodate 0.01, anhydrous sodium selenate 0.01025, ammoniumparamolybdate 4-hydrate 0.00795, sodium metasilicate 9-hydrate 1.45, chromium potassium sulfate 12-hydrate 0.0275, boric acid 0.0815, sodium fluoride 0.0635, nickel carbonate 0.0318, lithium chloride 0.0714, ammonium vanadate 0.0066, powdered sucrose 221.026
Vitamin mix (AIN-93-VX) (g/kg mixture): nicotinic acid 3, Ca-pantothenate 1.6, pyridoxine HCl 0.7, thiamin-HCl 0.6, riboflavin 0.6, folic acid 0.2, D biotin 0.02, vitamin B12 (0.1% cyanocobalamin in mannitol) 2.5, vitamin E (all-ras-α-tocopheryl acetate, 500 IU/g) 15, vitamin A (alltrans-retinyl palmitate, 500,000 IU/g) 0.8, vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol, 400,000 IU/g) 0.25, vitamin K (phylloquinone) 0.075, powdered sucrose 974.655
Fig. 1.Effects of CGH on food intake (A) and hypothalamic mRNA levels (B) in lean rats. CGH was fed as a protein source for 1 week. Normal diet was used as a control diet. Values are expressed as means ± SE. Significant differences between two groups were analyzed with Student’s t-test (*P < 0.05).
Fig. 2.Body weight (A) and food intake (B) profiles during an 8-week CGH diet in DIO rats. Eight-week-old male SD rats were randomly divided into three groups according to body weight and fed the designated induction diet for 13 weeks; the normal-fat diet consisted of the AIN-93G diet (NF, n = 25), and the high-fat diet was modified from the AIN-93G diet (HF, n = 50). After 13 weeks, the HF group was re-randomized into 2 groups according to body weight and fed the designated experiment diet for 8 weeks: high-fat diet (HF, n = 25) or high-fat diet with CGH (HF-CGH, n = 25). Body weight and food intake were measured each week. Values are expressed as means ± SE. Significant differences among the three groups were analyzed by ANOVA. Values showing a different superscript letter among the three diet groups are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Fig. 3.Fat weights including perirenal (A) and epididymal fat (B) and adipokines including adiponectin (C) and leptin (D) profiles over 8 weeks in CGH-treated and DIO rats. Eight-week-old male SD rats were randomly divided into three groups according to body weight and fed the designated induction diet for 13 weeks; the normal-fat diet consisted of the AIN-93G diet (NF, n = 25), and the high-fat diet was modified from the AIN-93G diet (HF, n = 50). After 13 weeks, the HF group was re-randomized into 2 groups according to body weight and fed the designated experiment diet for 8 weeks: high-fat diet (HF, n = 25) or high-fat diet with CGH (HF-CGH, n = 25). Every 2 weeks, five rats from each group were sacrificed, and fat weight and adipokines were analyzed. Values are expressed as means ± SE. Significant differences among the three groups were analyzed by ANOVA. Values showing a different superscript letter among the three diet groups are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Fig. 4.Plasma [(A) for plasma TG and (B) for plasma TC) and hepatic lipid ((C) for hepatic TG, (D) for hepatic TC and (E) for hepatic total lipid) profiles over 8 weeks in CGH-treated and DIO rats. Eight-week-old male SD rats were randomly divided into three groups according to body weight and fed the designated induction diet for 13 weeks; the normal-fat diet consisted of the AIN-93G diet (NF, n = 25), and the high-fat diet was modified from the AIN-93G diet (HF, n = 50). After 13 weeks, the HF group was re-randomized into 2 groups according to body weight and fed the designated experiment diet for 8 weeks: high-fat diet (HF, n = 25) or high-fat diet with CGH (HF-CGH, n = 25). Every 2 weeks, five rats from each group were sacrificed, and lipid profiles were analyzed. Values are expressed as means ± SE. Significant differences among the three groups were analyzed by ANOVA. Values showing a different superscript letter among the three diet groups are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Fig. 5.Fasting glucose (A), insulin (B) and HOMA-IR (C) profiles over 8 weeks in CGH-treated and DIO rats. Eight-week-old male SD rats were randomly divided into three groups according to body weight and fed the designated induction diet for 13 weeks; the normal-fat diet consisted of the AIN-93G diet (NF, n = 25), and the high-fat diet was modified from the AIN-93G diet (HF, n = 50). After 13 weeks, the HF group was re-randomized into 2 groups according to body weight and fed the designated experiment diet for 8 weeks: high-fat diet (HF, n = 25) or high-fat diet with CGH (HF-CGH, n = 25). Every 2 weeks, five rats from each group were sacrificed, and fasting glucose and insulin levels were analyzed. Using glucose and insulin levels, HOMA-IR levels were calculated. Values are expressed as means ± SE. Significant differences among the three groups were analyzed by ANOVA. Values showing a different superscript letter among the three diet groups are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Fig. 6.Pathway analysis of white adipose tissue genes affected by CGH administration in high-fat diet-induced obese rats. The functional clustering of differentially regulated genes between the HF and HF-CGH groups is performed based on Gene Ontology (GO) annotation in terms of molecular function (MF), biological process (BP) and cellular component (CC). The top 10 pathways obtained are sorted based on significance. For each pathway, the P-value is presented.
Fold changes of selected genes influenced by CGH in high-fat diet induced rats
| Description | Fold change | |
|---|---|---|
| Olfactory receptor 149 | 1.70 | 0.036 |
| Olfactory receptor 1250 | 1.51 | 0.002 |
| Olfactory receptor 578 | 0.47 | 0.033 |
| G-protein-coupled receptor 98 | 1.67 | 0.030 |
| Olfactory receptor 1144 | 1.69 | 0.031 |
| Olfactory receptor 1615 | 1.70 | 0.036 |
| Olfactory receptor 602 | 0.47 | 0.033 |
| RT1, class Ib, locus M5 | 0.58 | 0.014 |
| Amiloride-sensitive cation channel 1, neuronal | 1.69 | 0.031 |
| Low-density lipoprotein receptor | 1.51 | 0.024 |
| Coagulation factor III | 1.54 | 0.002 |
| cyclic nucleotide gated channel alpha 1 | 1.50 | 0.003 |
| potassium large conductance calcium-activated channel, subfamily M beta member 3 | 1.51 | 0.038 |
| ST8 alpha-N-acetyl-neuraminide alpha-2,8-sialyltransferase 4 | 1.57 | 0.011 |
| solute carrier organic anion transporter family, member 1a5 | 1.53 | 0.023 |
| progestin and adipoQ receptor family member VIII | 0.10 | 0.002 |
| killer cell lectin-like receptor subfamily C, member 3 | 0.46 | 0.034 |
Significant differences between the HF and HF-CGH groups were evaluated by Student’s t-test (**P < 0.001).