E G Thomas1, M J Spittal1, E B Heffernan2, F S Taxman3, R Alati4, S A Kinner1. 1. Melbourne School of Population and Global Health,University of Melbourne,Parkville,VIC,Australia. 2. School of Medicine,University of Queensland,Herston,QLD,Australia. 3. Criminology,Law & Society,College of Humanities and Social Sciences,George Mason University,Fairfax,VI,USA. 4. School of Public Health and Centre of Youth Substance Abuse Research,University of Queensland,Herston,QLD,Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Understanding individual-level changes in mental health status after prison release is crucial to providing targeted and effective mental health care to ex-prisoners. We aimed to describe trajectories of psychological distress following prison discharge and compare these trajectories with mental health service use in the community. METHOD: The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) was administered to 1216 sentenced adult prisoners in Queensland, Australia, before prison release and approximately 1, 3 and 6 months after release. We used group-based trajectory modeling to identify K10 trajectories after release. Contact with community mental health services in the year following release was assessed via data linkage. RESULTS: We identified five trajectory groups, representing consistently low (51.1% of the cohort), consistently moderate (29.8%), high increasing (11.6%), high declining (5.5%) and consistently very high (1.9%) psychological distress. Mood disorder, anxiety disorder, history of self-harm and risky drug use were risk factors for the high increasing, very high and high declining trajectory groups. Women were over-represented in the high increasing and high declining groups, but men were at higher risk of very high psychological distress. Within the high increasing and very high groups, 25% of participants accessed community mental health services in the first year post-release, for a median of 4.4 contact hours. CONCLUSIONS: For the majority of prisoners with high to very high psychological distress, distress persists after release. However, contact with mental health services in the community appears low. Further research is required to understand barriers to mental health service access among ex-prisoners.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Understanding individual-level changes in mental health status after prison release is crucial to providing targeted and effective mental health care to ex-prisoners. We aimed to describe trajectories of psychological distress following prison discharge and compare these trajectories with mental health service use in the community. METHOD: The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) was administered to 1216 sentenced adult prisoners in Queensland, Australia, before prison release and approximately 1, 3 and 6 months after release. We used group-based trajectory modeling to identify K10 trajectories after release. Contact with community mental health services in the year following release was assessed via data linkage. RESULTS: We identified five trajectory groups, representing consistently low (51.1% of the cohort), consistently moderate (29.8%), high increasing (11.6%), high declining (5.5%) and consistently very high (1.9%) psychological distress. Mood disorder, anxiety disorder, history of self-harm and risky drug use were risk factors for the high increasing, very high and high declining trajectory groups. Women were over-represented in the high increasing and high declining groups, but men were at higher risk of very high psychological distress. Within the high increasing and very high groups, 25% of participants accessed community mental health services in the first year post-release, for a median of 4.4 contact hours. CONCLUSIONS: For the majority of prisoners with high to very high psychological distress, distress persists after release. However, contact with mental health services in the community appears low. Further research is required to understand barriers to mental health service access among ex-prisoners.
Entities:
Keywords:
Community mental health services; ex-prisoners; mental health; psychological distress; trajectory models
Authors: Devin English; Joseph A Carter; Lisa Bowleg; David J Malebranche; Ali J Talan; H Jonathon Rendina Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Lauren Weston; Sarah Rybczynska-Bunt; Cath Quinn; Charlotte Lennox; Mike Maguire; Mark Pearson; Alex Stirzaker; Graham Durcan; Caroline Stevenson; Jonathan Graham; Lauren Carroll; Rebecca Greer; Mark Haddad; Rachael Hunter; Rob Anderson; Roxanne Todd; Sara Goodier; Sarah Brand; Susan Michie; Tim Kirkpatrick; Sarah Leonard; Tirril Harris; William Henley; Jenny Shaw; Christabel Owens; Richard Byng Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Tim Kirkpatrick; Charlotte Lennox; Rod Taylor; Rob Anderson; Michael Maguire; Mark Haddad; Susan Michie; Christabel Owens; Graham Durcan; Alex Stirzaker; William Henley; Caroline Stevenson; Lauren Carroll; Cath Quinn; Sarah Louise Brand; Tirril Harris; Amy Stewart; Roxanne Todd; Sarah Rybczynska-Bunt; Rebecca Greer; Mark Pearson; Jenny Shaw; Richard Byng Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-02-20 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Jesse T Young; Cheneal Puljević; Alexander D Love; Emilia K Janca; Catherine J Segan; Donita Baird; Rachel Whiffen; Stan Pappos; Emma Bell; Stuart A Kinner Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-06-04 Impact factor: 2.692