| Literature DB >> 26548806 |
Samira Hosseini1,2, Mohammad M Aeinehvand1,2, Shah M Uddin1,2, Abderazak Benzina3, Hussin A Rothan4, Rohana Yusof4, Leo H Koole1,2,3, Marc J Madou1,2,5,6, Ivan Djordjevic1,2, Fatimah Ibrahim1,2.
Abstract
The application of microfluidic devices in diagnostic systems is well-established in contemporary research. Large specific surface area of microspheres, on the other hand, has secured an important position for their use in bioanalytical assays. Herein, we report a combination of microspheres and microfluidic disk in a unique hybrid platform for highly sensitive and selective detection of dengue virus. Surface engineered polymethacrylate microspheres with carefully designed functional groups facilitate biorecognition in a multitude manner. In order to maximize the utility of the microspheres' specific surface area in biomolecular interaction, the microfluidic disk was equipped with a micromixing system. The mixing mechanism (microballoon mixing) enhances the number of molecular encounters between spheres and target analyte by accessing the entire sample volume more effectively, which subsequently results in signal amplification. Significant reduction of incubation time along with considerable lower detection limits were the prime motivations for the integration of microspheres inside the microfluidic disk. Lengthy incubations of routine analytical assays were reduced from 2 hours to 5 minutes while developed system successfully detected a few units of dengue virus. Obtained results make this hybrid microsphere-microfluidic approach to dengue detection a promising avenue for early detection of this fatal illness.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26548806 PMCID: PMC4637926 DOI: 10.1038/srep16485
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Overall interpretation of the procedure: (a) integration of the optimized microspheres into the microfluidic disk equipped with micromixing system; (b) detailed illustration of the sandwich ELISA aimed for DV detection; (c) different immobilizing interactions between microspheres and antibodies at the interface. Microspheres are yellow in their color but in the schematic representation, they are depicted in gray for better contrast.
Figure 2Microfluidic disk’s components: (a) microfluidic features of a mixing unit; (b) arrangement of PMMA, Latex, and PSA layers used in fabrication of microfluidic disk.
Figure 3Liquid reciprocations inside a mixing chamber (a); and spin profile of the microfluidic disk during a complete mixing cycle (b). Centrifugal force at high spin rate has forced the liquid to expand the microballoon that results in a decrease in liquid level inside the mixing chamber. Afterwards, reducing the spin rate has contracted the microballoon to push back the liquid into the mixing chamber again.
Figure 4Microspheres analysis (size 3 only): (a,b) morphology analysis by SEM; (c,d) optical microscopy images of microspheres used for size distribution analysis; (e) determined size distribution of the microspheres; and (f) calculated specific surface area per different dosages of the microspheres.
Figure 5Performance of the microspheres in DV detection: (a) detection range study performed on the microspheres (20 mg) of different sizes and conventional ELISA (polystyrene) in a broad range of DV concentration; (inset) representative negative controls in sandwich ELISA at which the assay was conducted in the absence of DV (spheres’ dosage = 20 mg); (b) statistical analysis of the performance of the spheres from different size groups (c) dosage influence on detection performance conducted on the spheres of different size ranges via sandwich ELISA (DV concentration = 3.5 × 102 p.f.u/mL). Negative controls for parts b and c of this Figure follow the insert from part a.
Figure 6Performance of the microspheres in DV detection: (a) detection range analysis for the well plates and microfluidic disks with microspheres (20 mg of size 3 spheres) in comparison to the conventional ELISA (depicted results are original data along with their cut-off values); (b) influence of spheres’ dosage (size 3 spheres) on the detection performance (DV concentration = 3.5 × 102 p.f.u/mL, results are plotted after subtraction of the cut-off values); (inset) negative controls for microspheres integrated well plate and microfluidic disk (spheres’ dosage = 20 mg).
Figure 7Comparison of the detection performance over different incubation periods (dosage of the spheres = 20 mg and DV concentration = 3.5 × 102 p.f.u/mL); insets depict blank controls, which are the detection signals generated from the well plate and microfluidic disk without microspheres (negative controls are provided in Supplementary section, Fig. 9S).
Break down values for sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and limit of detection (LoD) for microspheres integrated microfluidic disk and 96-well plate in comparison to conventional ELISA.
| Platform | Microfluidic disk | Well plate | ELISA | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DV status | + | − | + | − | + | − |
| Positive | 37 | 2 | 37 | 1 | 29 | 3 |
| Negative | 1 | 14 | 1 | 15 | 9 | 13 |
| Total | 38 | 16 | 38 | 16 | 38 | 16 |
| 97.36 | 97.36 | 76.31 | ||||
| 87.5 | 93.75 | 81.25 | ||||
| 94.44 | 96.29 | 77.77 | ||||
| 1.9 | 5.12 | 5 × 103 | ||||