Literature DB >> 26548100

[Complications Resulting from Taking Ear Impressions].

Tomoko Sugiuchi, Kazuoki Kodera, Hiroyuki Zusho, Yoshikazu Asano, Keiko Kanesada, Mitsuhiro Hayashida, Koichiro Kanaya, Takeshi Tokumaru.   

Abstract

In 2012, we carried out a study in a large sample to understand the secondary injuries caused during the taking ear impressions for hearing aids. This study is a follow-up of previous research conducted in 1986 (285 medical institutions) and 1999 (98 medical institutions). We posted a questionnaire survey to the otolaryngology departments of 3,257 medical institutions. The response rate to the questionnaire was 62.9% (2,050 of the 3,257 institutions), and the results indicated that 301 of the 2050 institutions (14.7%) had experience with secondary injuries, with a total of 460 cases reported. In 342 of the 460 cases (74.3%), the secondary injuries occurred at hearing-aid dealerships, followed by 67 cases (14.6%) at affiliated medical institutions, and 51 cases (11.1%) in other locations, including other medical institutions, rehabilitation counseling centers, and educational institutions. The most common type of secondary injury (298 cases, 64.8%) was caused by the presence of foreign bodies in the ear, which in turn was a result of complications occurring during the removal of residual ear impression material. Of these 298 cases, 32 required excision of the foreign bodies and surgical intervention under general anesthesia. The remaining 10 cases exhibited isolated tympanic membrane perforation without foreign body-related complications. Furthermore, 146 cases (31.7%) developed bleeding and otitis externa following removal of the ear impression, and there were reports of cases with bleeding that required long-term outpatient care and treatment. Therefore, since retention of a foreign body in the ear and tympanic membrane perforation can occur even in patients without a history of surgery or prior otologic history, adjustment of hearing aids requires prior otorhinolaryngological examination. Furthermore, because of the risk of secondary injury when taking ear impressions, this procedure must be performed with caution under the guidance of an otolaryngologist.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26548100     DOI: 10.3950/jibiinkoka.118.1058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho        ISSN: 0030-6622


  1 in total

1.  Earmold Foreign Bodies in the Middle Ear Necessitating Surgical Removal: Why Otology Specialists Should Screen Candidates for Hearing Aids.

Authors:  Sung-Dong Cho; Jeong Hun Jang; Hantai Kim; Yang-Sun Cho; Yoonjoong Kim; Ja-Won Koo; Jae-Jin Song
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 3.372

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.