Literature DB >> 26547834

Racial and economic disparities in the treatment of penile squamous cell carcinoma: Results from the National Cancer Database.

Pranav Sharma1, Kenan Ashouri1, Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari1, Adam M Luchey1, Philippe E Spiess2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated sociodemographic and economic differences in overall survival (OS) of patients with penile SCC using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB).
METHODS: We identified 5,412 patients with a diagnosis of penile squamous cell carcinoma from 1998 to 2011 with clinically nonmetastatic disease and available pathologic tumor and nodal staging. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences were determined using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard regression was performed to identify independent predictors of OS.
RESULTS: Estimated median OS was 91.9 months (interquartile range: 25.8-not reached) at median follow-up of 44.7 months (interquartile range: 17.2-81.0). Survival did not change over the study period (P = 0.28). Black patients presented with a higher stage of disease (pT3/T4: 16.6 vs. 13.2%, P = 0.027) and had worse median OS (68.6 vs. 93.7 months, P<0.01). Patients with private insurance and median income≥$63,000 based on zip code presented with a lower stage of disease (pT3/T4: 11.6 vs. 14.7%, P = 0.002 and 12.0 vs. 14.0%, P = 0.042, respectively) and had better median OS (163.2 vs. 70.8 months, P<0.01 and 105.3 vs. 86.4 months, p = 0.001, respectively). On multivariate analysis, black race (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21-1.58; P<0.01) was independently associated with worse OS, whereas private insurance (HR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.63-0.98; P = 0.028) and higher median income≥$63,000 (HR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.72-0.93; P = 0.001) were independently associated with better OS.
CONCLUSIONS: Racial and economic differences in the survival of patients with penile cancer exist. An understanding of these differences may help minimize disparities in cancer care.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  National Cancer Database; Overall survival; Penile cancer; Race; Squamous cell carcinoma; Treatment disparities

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26547834     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  8 in total

Review 1.  Racial and Ethnic Healthcare Disparities in Skin Cancer in the United States: A Review of Existing Inequities, Contributing Factors, and Potential Solutions.

Authors:  Kimberly Shao; Hao Feng
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2022-07

2.  Underutilization of Surgical Standard of Care for Insured Men with Invasive Penile Cancer.

Authors:  Edward K Chang; Rishi R Sekar; Sarah K Holt; John L Gore; Jonathan L Wright; Yaw A Nyame
Journal:  Urol Pract       Date:  2021-05-01

3.  Development and Verification of Prognostic Nomogram for Penile Cancer Based on the SEER Database.

Authors:  Yon-Bo Chen; Ying-Wen Liu; Liang Gao; Liang-You Tang; Jiang Guo; Yu-Chang Tian; Ping-Hong You
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  National trends and survival outcomes of penile squamous cell carcinoma based on human papillomavirus status.

Authors:  Juan Chipollini; Grant Pollock; Chiu-Hsieh Hsu; Ken Batai; Alejandro Recio-Boiles; Benjamin R Lee
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-10-10       Impact factor: 4.452

5.  Get insight into the cause of death distribution and epidemiology of penile squamous cell carcinoma: A population-based study.

Authors:  Xiangpeng Zhan; Luyao Chen; Ming Jiang; Bin Fu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.711

6.  Novel Prognostic Models for Patients With Penile Carcinoma.

Authors:  Monica E Reyes; Heloise Borges; Muhamed Said Adjao; Nisha Vijayakumar; Philippe E Spiess; Matthew B Schabath
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

7.  Competing-risks model for predicting the prognosis of penile cancer based on the SEER database.

Authors:  Jin Yang; Zhenyu Pan; Yujing He; Fanfan Zhao; Xiaojie Feng; Qingqing Liu; Jun Lyu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-10-27       Impact factor: 4.452

8.  Partial penectomy or total penectomy for T1 and T2 squamous cell carcinoma of the penis?

Authors:  Qi-Le Zheng; Yu-Peng Wu; Zi-Ping Zhang; Ning Xu
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.241

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.