Literature DB >> 26547623

Experimental studies of thermal environment and contaminant transport in a commercial aircraft cabin with gaspers on.

B Li1, R Duan1, J Li1, Y Huang1, H Yin1, C-H Lin2, D Wei3, X Shen4, J Liu1, Q Chen1,5.   

Abstract

Gaspers installed in commercial airliner cabins are used to improve passengers' thermal comfort. To understand the impact of gasper airflow on the air quality in a cabin, this investigation measured the distributions of air velocity, air temperature, and gaseous contaminant concentration in five rows of the economy-class section of an MD-82 commercial aircraft. The gaseous contaminant was simulated using SF6 as a tracer gas with the source located at the mouth of a seated manikin close to the aisle. Two-fifths of the gaspers next to the aisle were turned on in the cabin, and each of them supplied air at a flow rate of 0.66 l/s. The airflow rate in the economy-class cabin was controlled at 10 l/s per passenger. Data obtained in a previous study of the cabin with all gaspers turned off were used for comparison. The results show that the jets from the gaspers had a substantial impact on the air velocity and contaminant transport in the cabin. The air velocity in the cabin was higher, and the air temperature slightly more uniform, when the gaspers were on than when they were off, but turning on the gaspers may not have improved the air quality.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  Air temperature; Air velocity; Gaseous contaminant concentration; Gaspers; Jets; Measurements

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26547623     DOI: 10.1111/ina.12265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indoor Air        ISSN: 0905-6947            Impact factor:   5.770


  6 in total

1.  Aerosol tracer testing in Boeing 767 and 777 aircraft to simulate exposure potential of infectious aerosol such as SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Sean M Kinahan; David B Silcott; Blake E Silcott; Ryan M Silcott; Peter J Silcott; Braden J Silcott; Steven L Distelhorst; Vicki L Herrera; Danielle N Rivera; Kevin K Crown; Gabriel A Lucero; Joshua L Santarpia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Evaluation of different air distribution systems in a commercial airliner cabin in terms of comfort and COVID-19 infection risk.

Authors:  Mingxin Liu; Junjie Liu; Qing Cao; Xingyang Li; Sumei Liu; Shengcheng Ji; Chao-Hsin Lin; Daniel Wei; Xiong Shen; Zhengwei Long; Qingyan Chen
Journal:  Build Environ       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 6.456

Review 3.  Recent progress on studies of airborne infectious disease transmission, air quality, and thermal comfort in the airliner cabin air environment.

Authors:  Feng Wang; Ruoyu You; Tengfei Zhang; Qingyan Chen
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 6.554

4.  An innovative personalized displacement ventilation system for airliner cabins.

Authors:  Ruoyu You; Yongzhi Zhang; Xingwang Zhao; Chao-Hsin Lin; Daniel Wei; Junjie Liu; Qingyan Chen
Journal:  Build Environ       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 6.456

5.  Investigating the impact of gaspers on cabin air quality in commercial airliners with a hybrid turbulence model.

Authors:  Ruoyu You; Jun Chen; Chao-Hsin Lin; Daniel Wei; Qingyan Chen
Journal:  Build Environ       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 6.456

6.  Respiratory bioaerosol deposition from a cough and recovery of viable viruses on nearby seats in a cabin environment.

Authors:  Cunteng Wang; Jingcui Xu; Sau Chung Fu; Ka Chung Chan; Christopher Y H Chao
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 6.554

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.