Literature DB >> 26546194

Prospective Evaluation of Innovative Force Assessing Firmware in Simulation to Improve the Technical Competence of Surgical Trainees.

Allwyn S Rajamani1, Ashwin Rammohan2, Sasikala Mohan3, Poonguzhali Srinivasan4, Shanmugam Arthanari5, Umamaheshwaran Muthusamy6, Vijayanand Sivasubramanian7, Palaniappan Ravichandran8.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Suturing is an integral part of all surgeries. In minimal access surgery, the force exerted is based only on visual perception (tautness of the thread and degree of tissue deformation). An unbalanced suture force can cause tissue rupture or cut-through resulting in avoidable morbidity and mortality. There is a need to find ways of improving surgical dexterity and finesse without adversely affecting patient outcomes. AIM: We aimed to calculate the knot-tying force in minimal access pancreatic surgery (MAPS) performed by experienced surgeons (ES) and use this information to develop a surgical suturing model to train the surgical trainees. We have developed a firmware for force sensor calibration and post-data analysis, using which we aimed to compare the differences in forces applied by a trainee as compared to ES.
RESULTS: Our technology showed that, as compared to the ES, the trainee's (TS) knot was unbalanced with significant differences in force applied per knot for each of the knots (P < 0.01). The shape of the Force curve for each suture was also different for the TS as compared to the ES. After using the training tool, the forces applied by the TS and the Force curve for the whole suture were similar to those of the ES.
CONCLUSION: Our firmware promises to be an excellent training tool for organ anastomosis. Considering the complexity and likely complications of MAPS, it is a sine qua non that the surgeon be highly experienced and skilled. Surgical simulation is attractive because it avoids the use of patients for skills practice and provides relevant technical training for trainees before they can safely operate on humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26546194     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-015-3315-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  14 in total

Review 1.  Minimally-invasive vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Camilo Correa-Gallego; Helen E Dinkelspiel; Isabel Sulimanoff; Sarah Fisher; Eduardo F Viñuela; T Peter Kingham; Yuman Fong; Ronald P DeMatteo; Michael I D'Angelica; William R Jarnagin; Peter J Allen
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Impact an anatomical site on bacteriological and clinical outcome in the management of intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  S E Wilson; K Faulkner
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 3.  Measures to prevent pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Eric C H Lai; Stephanie H Y Lau; Wan Yee Lau
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2009-11

4.  Tension leads to increased neutrophil accumulation and decreased laparotomy wound strength.

Authors:  H Högström; U Haglund; B Zederfeldt
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Visual force feedback improves knot-tying security.

Authors:  Tim Horeman; Mathijs D Blikkendaal; Daisy Feng; Arjan van Dijke; FrankWillem Jansen; Jenny Dankelman; John J van den Dobbelsteen
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.891

6.  Effect of preoperative biliary decompression on pancreaticoduodenectomy-associated morbidity in 300 consecutive patients.

Authors:  P W Pisters; W A Hudec; K R Hess; J E Lee; J N Vauthey; S Lahoti; I Raijman; D B Evans
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Effect of preoperative biliary stenting on immediate outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  P Jagannath; V Dhir; S Shrikhande; R C Shah; P Mullerpatan; K M Mohandas
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Influence of suture technique on laparotomy wound healing: an experimental study in the rat.

Authors:  J Höer; U Klinge; A Schachtrupp; C Töns; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 9.  Systematic review of skills transfer after surgical simulation-based training.

Authors:  S R Dawe; G N Pena; J A Windsor; J A J L Broeders; P C Cregan; P J Hewett; G J Maddern
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a single-institution comparative study.

Authors:  Yue Zhang; Xue-Min Chen; Dong-Lin Sun
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 2.754

View more
  1 in total

1.  An Integrated Multi-Sensor Network for Adaptive Grasping of Fragile Fruits: Design and Feasibility Tests.

Authors:  Yuanxin Xie; Baohua Zhang; Jun Zhou; Yuhao Bai; Meng Zhang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 3.576

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.