Literature DB >> 26546180

Analysis of Risk Factors for Intraoperative Conversion of Laparoscopic Myomectomy.

Evelien M Sandberg1, Sarah L Cohen2, Frank Willem Jansen3, Jon I Einarsson4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To report the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) and abdominal myomectomy (AM) at a high-volume tertiary care hospital, to evaluate the risk of conversion during LM, and to analyze the associated risk factors.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II). PATIENTS: All patients who underwent LM and AM in a tertiary academic center in Boston, Massachusetts between 2009 and 2012. INTERVENTION: Medical records were reviewed for baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes. Robot-assisted laparoscopy was considered a subtype of LM.
RESULTS: A total of 966 patients underwent myomectomy during the study period, including 731 LM cases (75.67%) and 235 AM cases (24.33%). Compared with patients undergoing LM, those undergoing AM had more myomas removed and heavier specimens (mean number of myomas, 12.60 vs 3.54, p ≤ .001; mean weight, 592.75 g vs 263.4 g, p ≤ .001). Conversion was necessary in 8 LM cases (1.09%). All conversions were reactive in nature and were associated with greater blood loss (mean, 1381.25 vs 167.95 mL; p ≤ .001) and longer hospital stay (mean, 3.13 vs 0.55 days; p ≤ .001) compared with cases without conversion. Factors associated with conversion included both the number and the weight of myomas removed (mean number, 9.75 vs 3.48, p = .003; mean weight, 667.9 vs 259.25 g, p = .015), especially with myomas weighing >500 g (odds ratio = 8.551; p = .005).
CONCLUSION: The risk of conversion for LM was low (1.09%) in this cohort, and was associated both with the number and the weight of myomas removed. LM is a feasible approach for surgical management of myomas in the majority of cases; however, when myomas are expected to weigh >500 g, it may be prudent to consider referring those cases to specialized centers with highly experienced teams.
Copyright © 2016 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conversion rate; Laparoscopic myomectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26546180     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.10.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  4 in total

Review 1.  Rethinking the Issue of Power Morcellation of Uterine Fibroids: Is Morcellation the Real Problem or Is this Another Symptom of Disparity in Healthcare Provision?

Authors:  Funlayo Odejinmi; Mehrnoosh Aref-Adib; Natasha Liou; Michail Sideris; Rebecca Mallick
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Efficacy and Safety of Combined Ultrasonic and Bipolar Energy Source in Laparoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  Daniel C Steinemann; Sebastian H Lamm; Andreas Zerz
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Combining situ-morcellation with continuous-fill-mattress suture in laparoscopic myomectomy: A surgical approach of choice for patients with large uterine fibroids.

Authors:  Bo Li; Shitai Zhang; Ningye Ma; Yisheng Jiao; Yang Zhou; Sha Ni; Xue Han; Xiaomo Liu; Ling Ouyang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Pushing the boundaries of laparoscopic myomectomy: a comparative analysis of peri-operative outcomes in 323 women undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy in a tertiary referral centre.

Authors:  Rebecca Mallick; Funlayo Odejinmi
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2017-11-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.