Literature DB >> 26545685

CUTOFF POINT OF THE PHASE ANGLE IN PRE-RADIOTHERAPY CANCER PATIENTS.

Rachel Souza Thompson Motta1, Ivany Alves Castanho2, Luis Guillermo Coca Velarde3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: malnutrition is a common complication for cancer patients. The phase angle (PA), direct measurement of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), has been considered a predictor of body cell mass and prognostic indicator. Cutoff points for phase angle (PA) associated with nutritional risk in cancer patients have not been determined yet.
OBJECTIVES: assess the possibility of determining the cutoff point for PA to identify nutritional risk in pre-radiotherapy cancer patients.
METHODS: sample group: Patients from both genders diagnosed with cancer and sent for ambulatory radiotherapy. VARIABLES STUDIED: body mass index (BMI), percentage of weight loss (% WL), mid-arm circumference (MAC), triceps skinfold thickness (TST), mid-arm muscle circumference (MAMC), mid-arm muscle area (MAMA), score and categorical assessment obtained using the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) form, PA and standardized phase angle (SPA). Kappa coefficient was used to test the degree of agreement between the diagnoses of nutritional risk obtained from several different methods of nutritional assessment. Cutoff points for the PA through anthropometric indicators and PG-SGA were determined by using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, and patient survival was analyzed with the Cox regression method.
RESULTS: the cutoff points with the greatest discriminatory power were those obtained from BMI (5.2) and the categorical assessment of PG-SGA (5.4). The diagnosis obtained using these cutoff points showed a significant association with risk of death for the patients in the sample group.
CONCLUSION: we recommend using the cutoff point 5.2 for the PA as a criterion for identifying nutritional risk in pre-radiotherapy cancer patients. Copyright AULA MEDICA EDICIONES 2014. Published by AULA MEDICA. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26545685     DOI: 10.3305/nh.2015.32.5.9626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Hosp        ISSN: 0212-1611            Impact factor:   1.057


  4 in total

1.  A bioimpedance analysis of head-and-neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.

Authors:  K Kohli; R Corns; K Vinnakota; P Steiner; C Elith; D Schellenberg; W Kwan; A Karvat
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Comparison of different methods for nutrition assessment in patients with tumors.

Authors:  Hongzhen Du; Bingbing Liu; Ying Xie; Jinli Liu; Yujia Wei; Huanyu Hu; Bin Luo; Zengning Li
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Phase angle obtained by bioelectrical impedance analysis independently predicts mortality in patients with cirrhosis.

Authors:  Giliane Belarmino; Maria Cristina Gonzalez; Raquel S Torrinhas; Priscila Sala; Wellington Andraus; Luiz Augusto Carneiro D'Albuquerque; Rosa Maria R Pereira; Valéria F Caparbo; Graziela R Ravacci; Lucas Damiani; Steven B Heymsfield; Dan L Waitzberg
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2017-03-08

4.  Bioelectrical phase angle at diagnosis as a prognostic factor for survival in advanced head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Lars Axelsson; Ewa Silander; Ingvar Bosaeus; Eva Hammerlid
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 2.503

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.