Ruth M A van Nispen1,2, Hilde L Vreeken1,2, Hannie C Comijs2,3, Dorly J H Deeg2,4, Ger H M B van Rens1,2,5. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 2. EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 3. GGZinGeest/Department of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 5. Department of Ophthalmology, Elkerliek Hospital, Helmond, the Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Although the prevalence of depression in visually impaired older persons is high, the association between vision loss and depression seems to be influenced by factors other than visual impairment. In this study, the role of vision loss, functional limitations and social network characteristics in relation to depressive symptoms was investigated. METHODS: Cross-sectional data (N = 1237) from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam were used to investigate the prevalence of depression (Center of Epidemiological Studies-Depression scale) within subgroups with increasing vision loss. In linear regression models, functional limitations and social network characteristics were examined as possible mediators in the association between vision loss and depression. Having a partner was considered to be a potential moderator. RESULTS: Although a significant linear trend was found in the presence of depressive symptoms with 14% in normally sighted, 23% in mild and 37% in severe vision loss (χ(2)(1) = 14.9; p < 0.001), vision loss was not an independent determinant of depression. Mediators were functional limitations (p < 0.001) and social network size (p = 0.009). No interaction with partner status was found. CONCLUSION: In the presence of depression, a trend was found with increasing severity of vision loss, indicating the need for more attention in (mental) health care and low-vision rehabilitation. In the general older population, vision loss was not an independent determinant of depression but was mediated by functional limitations and social network size. Rather than receiving actual social support, the idea of having a social network to rely on when needed seemed to be associated with lower levels of depression.
PURPOSE: Although the prevalence of depression in visually impaired older persons is high, the association between vision loss and depression seems to be influenced by factors other than visual impairment. In this study, the role of vision loss, functional limitations and social network characteristics in relation to depressive symptoms was investigated. METHODS: Cross-sectional data (N = 1237) from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam were used to investigate the prevalence of depression (Center of Epidemiological Studies-Depression scale) within subgroups with increasing vision loss. In linear regression models, functional limitations and social network characteristics were examined as possible mediators in the association between vision loss and depression. Having a partner was considered to be a potential moderator. RESULTS: Although a significant linear trend was found in the presence of depressive symptoms with 14% in normally sighted, 23% in mild and 37% in severe vision loss (χ(2)(1) = 14.9; p < 0.001), vision loss was not an independent determinant of depression. Mediators were functional limitations (p < 0.001) and social network size (p = 0.009). No interaction with partner status was found. CONCLUSION: In the presence of depression, a trend was found with increasing severity of vision loss, indicating the need for more attention in (mental) health care and low-vision rehabilitation. In the general older population, vision loss was not an independent determinant of depression but was mediated by functional limitations and social network size. Rather than receiving actual social support, the idea of having a social network to rely on when needed seemed to be associated with lower levels of depression.
Authors: Paul Mick; Maksim Parfyonov; Walter Wittich; Natalie Phillips; Dawn Guthrie; M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Manon H J Veldman; Hilde P A van der Aa; Christina Bode; Hans Knoop; Carel T J Hulshof; Marc Koopmanschap; Edwin Stavleu; Ger H M B van Rens; Ruth M A van Nispen Journal: Trials Date: 2021-12-28 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Miriam L Stolwijk; Ruth M A van Nispen; Ilona W M Verburg; Lieke van Gerwen; Tim van de Brug; Ger H M B van Rens Journal: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt Date: 2022-04-04 Impact factor: 3.992
Authors: Jacob J Abou-Hanna; Amanda N Leggett; Chris A Andrews; Joshua R Ehrlich Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Ruth van Nispen; Hilde van der Aa; Frank Timmermans; Nikki Meijer; Nicole Koster; Jos de Blok; Jan Keunen; Ger van Rens Journal: Acta Ophthalmol Date: 2018-10-27 Impact factor: 3.761
Authors: I M Maaswinkel; H P A van der Aa; G H M B van Rens; A T F Beekman; J W R Twisk; R M A van Nispen Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2020-09-24 Impact factor: 3.630