Maan Isabella Cajita1, Kelly T Gleason, Hae-Ra Han. 1. Maan Isabella Cajita, BSN, RN-BC PhD Student, School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.Kelly T. Gleason, BSN, RN PhD Student, School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.Hae-Ra Han, PhD, RN, FAAN Associate Professor, School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The popularity of mobile phones and similar mobile devices makes it an ideal medium for delivering interventions. This is especially true with heart failure (HF) interventions, in which mHealth-based HF interventions are rapidly replacing their telephone-based predecessors. PURPOSE: This systematic review examined the impact of mHealth-based HF management interventions on HF outcomes. The specific aims of the systematic review are to (1) describe current mHealth-based HF interventions and (2) discuss the impact of these interventions on HF outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, CINAHL Plus, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Scopus were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental studies that tested mHealth interventions in people with HF using the terms Heart Failure, Mobile Health, mHealth, Telemedicine, Text Messaging, Texting, Short Message Service, Mobile Applications, and Mobile Apps. CONCLUSIONS: Ten articles, representing 9 studies, were included in this review. The majority of the studies utilized mobile health technology as part of an HF monitoring system, which typically included a blood pressure-measuring device, weighing scale, and an electrocardiogram recorder. The impact of the mHealth interventions on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, HF-related hospitalizations, length of stay, New York Heart Association functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction, quality of life, and self-care were inconsistent at best. IMPLICATIONS: Further research is needed to conclusively determine the impact of mHealth interventions on HF outcomes. The limitations of the current studies (eg, inadequate sample size, quasi-experimental design, use of older mobile phone models, etc) should be taken into account when designing future studies.
BACKGROUND: The popularity of mobile phones and similar mobile devices makes it an ideal medium for delivering interventions. This is especially true with heart failure (HF) interventions, in which mHealth-based HF interventions are rapidly replacing their telephone-based predecessors. PURPOSE: This systematic review examined the impact of mHealth-based HF management interventions on HF outcomes. The specific aims of the systematic review are to (1) describe current mHealth-based HF interventions and (2) discuss the impact of these interventions on HF outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, CINAHL Plus, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Scopus were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental studies that tested mHealth interventions in people with HF using the terms Heart Failure, Mobile Health, mHealth, Telemedicine, Text Messaging, Texting, Short Message Service, Mobile Applications, and Mobile Apps. CONCLUSIONS: Ten articles, representing 9 studies, were included in this review. The majority of the studies utilized mobile health technology as part of an HF monitoring system, which typically included a blood pressure-measuring device, weighing scale, and an electrocardiogram recorder. The impact of the mHealth interventions on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, HF-related hospitalizations, length of stay, New York Heart Association functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction, quality of life, and self-care were inconsistent at best. IMPLICATIONS: Further research is needed to conclusively determine the impact of mHealth interventions on HF outcomes. The limitations of the current studies (eg, inadequate sample size, quasi-experimental design, use of older mobile phone models, etc) should be taken into account when designing future studies.
Authors: Alan S Go; Dariush Mozaffarian; Véronique L Roger; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; Michael J Blaha; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Sheila Franco; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Suzanne E Judd; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Rachel H Mackey; David J Magid; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Michael E Mussolino; Robert W Neumar; Graham Nichol; Dilip K Pandey; Nina P Paynter; Matthew J Reeves; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Amytis Towfighi; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Friedrich Koehler; Sebastian Winkler; Michael Schieber; Udo Sechtem; Karl Stangl; Michael Böhm; Herbert Boll; Gert Baumann; Marcus Honold; Kerstin Koehler; Goetz Gelbrich; Bridget-Anne Kirwan; Stefan D Anker Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-03-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Anton R Kiselev; Vladimir I Gridnev; Vladimir A Shvartz; Olga M Posnenkova; Pavel Ya Dovgalevsky Journal: J Am Soc Hypertens Date: 2012 Sep-Oct
Authors: Gerhard Hindricks; Milos Taborsky; Michael Glikson; Ullus Heinrich; Burghard Schumacher; Amos Katz; Johannes Brachmann; Thorsten Lewalter; Andreas Goette; Michael Block; Josef Kautzner; Stefan Sack; Daniela Husser; Christopher Piorkowski; Peter Søgaard Journal: Lancet Date: 2014-08-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Shiyi Zan; Stephen Agboola; Stephanie A Moore; Kimberly A Parks; Joseph C Kvedar; Kamal Jethwani Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2015-04-01 Impact factor: 4.773
Authors: Shantanu Nundy; Rabia R Razi; Jonathan J Dick; Bryan Smith; Ainoa Mayo; Anne O'Connor; David O Meltzer Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2013-03-11 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Daniel Scherr; Peter Kastner; Alexander Kollmann; Andreas Hallas; Johann Auer; Heinz Krappinger; Herwig Schuchlenz; Gerhard Stark; Wilhelm Grander; Gabriele Jakl; Guenter Schreier; Friedrich M Fruhwald Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2009-08-17 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Jennifer Dickman Portz; Anton Vehovec; Mary A Dolansky; Jennifer B Levin; Sheana Bull; Rebecca Boxer Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2017-07-12 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Jeff C Huffman; Diana M Smith; Nasrien E Ibrahim; Laura Duque; Judith T Moskowitz; Christopher M Celano Journal: Acta Cardiol Date: 2018-10-17 Impact factor: 1.718
Authors: Robert E Heinl; Devinder S Dhindsa; Elliot N Mahlof; William M Schultz; Johnathan C Ricketts; Tina Varghese; Amirhossein Esmaeeli; Marc P Allard-Ratick; Anthony J Millard; Heval M Kelli; Pratik B Sandesara; Danny J Eapen; Laurence Sperling Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2016-07-22 Impact factor: 5.223