| Literature DB >> 26543713 |
Hongyu Yin1,2, Henrik O Berdel1,3, David Moore1, Franklin Davis1, Jun Liu1, Mahmood Mozaffari1, Jack C Yu1, Babak Baban1.
Abstract
There is a worsening epidemic of obesity and diabetes in the world. Life style interventions including dietary changes and increase in exercise can improve glucose metabolism and health in general. However, standard exercise programs are strenuous, time-consuming, and thus have low long-term compliance issues. We tested the feasibility of using high frequency, low amplitude whole body vibration (WBV) therapy to improve glucose metabolism in young type 2 diabetic (T2DM) mice. We also aimed to investigate the postulated anti-inflammatory and cytoprotective properties of WBV. Male db/db and db/m mice were exposed to high frequency, low-amplitude WBV. Outcome parameters comprised of body weight, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level, as well as interleukin (IL)-17 (a marker of helper T cells), forkhead box P3 (Foxp3; a marker of regulatory T cells), and gammaH2AX (an index of DNA injury) expression. Furthermore, a 24 h metabolic cage study was carried out immediately after the WBV protocol and fluid intake, urine excretion and urine osmolality were determined. WBV did not affect body weight but improved HbA1c levels in db/db mice. Vibrated db/db mice demonstrated less fluid intake and urine excretion but better urinary concentrating ability than their non-vibrated controls. Pro-inflammatory changes were significantly reduced, as indicated by reduced IL-17 but increased Foxp3 expression. WBV reduced gammaH2AX in db/db mice suggestive of cytoprotective effect. However, WBV was largely without significant effects on assessed parameters in db/m mice. Collectively, our findings suggest that daily, short duration WBV may improve glycemic control, polydipsia, polyuria, and urine osmolality in T2DM in association with reduced inflammation. Thus, WBV may be a viable adjunctive treatment strategy in T2DM.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26543713 PMCID: PMC4628131 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-015-1373-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Fig. 1Picture of vibrating platform capable of delivering the prescribed high frequency, low amplitude vibration (“Methods”)
Fig. 2Body weight was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in db/db than db/m mice during the course of the study; data are mean ± SD of 6 animals/group
Fig. 3HbA1c levels of non-vibrated and vibrated db/m and db/db mice; data are mean ± SD of n = 6 animals for each group. *p < 0.05 compared to their respective db/m controls. **p < 0.05 compared to their non-vibrated counterparts
The metabolic cage results from db/m with and without WBV; data are mean ± SD of n = 3 animals/group
| Fluid intake (mL/24 h) | Urine excretion (mL/24 h) | Urine osmolality (mOsmol/kg) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| db/m | 1.33 ± 0.58 | 0.43 ± 0.06 | 2480.0 ± 303.2 |
| db/m | 1.00 ± 0.00# | 0.30 ± 0.17 | 3628.5 ± 691.0 |
| db/db | 21. 00 ± 0.00* | 17.00 ± 1.00* | 1084.17 ± 65.26* |
| db/db | 15. 67 ± 1.53*,# | 13.33 ± 1.53*,# | 1387.50 ± 133.30*,# |
| Size effect index; non-vibrated vs. vibrated db/m | 1.94 | 1.07 | 1.59 |
| Size effect index; non-vibrated vs. vibrated db/db | 1.90 | 1.73 | 1.74 |
* p < 0.05 compared to their db/m counterparts
#p < 0.05 compared tp their non-vibrated counterparts
Fig. 4Representative FACS dot plots of IL-17 and FoxP3 positive T cells in vibrated and non-vibrated db/m and db/db mice. CD4+ T cells of peripheral blood from experimental groups were further identified as those positive for IL-17 and FoxP3
Fig. 5FACS analysis of IL-17 (a) and Foxp3 (b) positive cells of peripheral blood obtained from vibrated and non-vibrated db/m and db/db mice; data are mean ± SD of percent of CD4+ cells of n = 6 mice/group. *p < 0.05 compared to their respective db/m controls. **p < 0.05 compared to their non-vibrated counterparts
Fig. 6FACS analysis of γH2AX (gamma-H2AX) expression of vibrated vs. non-vibrated db/m and db/db mice; data are expressed as mean ± SD of percent of total peripheral blood cells (n = 6 animals/group). *p < 0.05 compared to their respective db/m controls. **p < 0.05 compared to their non-vibrated counterparts