| Literature DB >> 26543535 |
Irena Roskar1, Peter Molek2, Miha Vodnik2, Mateja Stempelj1, Borut Strukelj2, Mojca Lunder2.
Abstract
AIMS/Entities:
Keywords: Maltase glucoamylase; Peptide modulators; Phage display
Year: 2015 PMID: 26543535 PMCID: PMC4627538 DOI: 10.1111/jdi.12358
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Diabetes Investig ISSN: 2040-1116 Impact factor: 4.232
Phage-displayed peptides with highest target-to-background binding
| Linear heptapeptide library | Cyclic heptapeptide library | Linear dodecapeptide library | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2 | 1x | TTYSRFP | D1 | 1x | QALLEGNAKGGN | |||
| D2 | 1x | GGTKTHVDFSLK | ||||||
| A2 | 6x | LPLTPLP | ||||||
| A3 | 1x | LPLGHHE | ||||||
| A4 | 1x | IGHLSFE | ||||||
Peptides denoted B, C and E were selected using non-specific elution, and peptides denoted A and D were selected using competitive elution. Peptides with sequences in bold have been further analyzed.
Figure 1(a) Binding of selected phage clones to maltase glucoamylase (MGAM; black bars) and to the background (bovine serum albumin [BSA] and anti-MGAM antibody coated wells; white bars). The striped bars show binding of phage clones to MGAM in the presence of a competitive inhibitor (0.5 mmol/L acarbose and 0.5 mmol/L voglibose). M13 phage vector showing no peptide was used as control. (b) Binding specificity of four selected phage clones to MGAM. The graph shown the differences in absorbances measured in MGAM-coated and blank microtiter wells at increasing amounts of phage particles.
Figure 2(a) Binding of phage clones to maltase glucoamylase (MGAM) in the presence of respective synthetic peptide. Black bars represent binding of phage clones alone to the MGAM, whereas striped bars represent binding of same clones to MGAM after preincubation of enzyme with 0.1 mmol/L corresponding synthetic peptide. White bars show binding of phage clones to blank wells. (b) Residual enzyme activity in the presence of synthetic peptides at 1.2 mmol/L concentration. The 100% enzyme activity position is marked with a line. Significant inhibition (12%) was observed with peptide C2. *P = 0.0238, compared with 100% enzyme activity.