| Literature DB >> 26543481 |
Myriam Ajemni1, Issa-Bella Balde1, Sofiane Kabiche1, Sandra Carret1, Jean-Eudes Fontan1, Salvatore Cisternino1, Joël Schlatter1.
Abstract
A stability-indicating assay by reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) method was developed for the determination of pentobarbital sodium in oral formulations: a drug used for infant sedation in computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. The chromatographic separation was achieved on a reversed-phase C18 column, using isocratic elution and a detector set at 214 nm. The optimized mobile phase consisted of a 0.01 M potassium buffer pH 3 and methanol (40 : 60, v/v). The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min and the run time of analysis was 5 min. The linearity of the method was demonstrated in the range of 5 to 250 μg/mL pentobarbital sodium solution (r (2) = 0.999). The limit of detection and limit of quantification were 2.10 and 3.97 μg/mL, respectively. The intraday and interday precisions were less than 2.1%. Accuracy of the method ranged from 99.2 to 101.3%. Stability studies indicate that the drug is stable to sunlight and in aqueous solution. Accelerated pentobarbital sodium breakdown by strong alkaline, acidic, or oxidative stress produced noninterfering peaks. This method allows accurate and reliable determination of pentobarbital sodium for drug stability assay in pharmaceutical studies.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26543481 PMCID: PMC4620273 DOI: 10.1155/2015/697937
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Anal Chem ISSN: 1687-8760 Impact factor: 1.885
Robustness.
| Parameters | Modification | % recovery |
|
|
| Plates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flow rate (mL/min) | 1.1 | 100.3 | 8.06 | 1.30 | 1.34 | 5503 |
| 1.2 | 100.2 | 7.73 | 1.26 | 1.27 | 5155 | |
| 1.3 | 100.2 | 7.46 | 1.19 | 1.38 | 4779 | |
|
| ||||||
| Wavelength of detection (nm) | 218 | 105.0 | 8.46 | 1.27 | 1.42 | 6042 |
| 220 | 103.4 | 8.43 | 1.33 | 1.35 | 5969 | |
| 225 | 78.5 | 8.41 | 1.31 | 1.42 | 5848 | |
|
| ||||||
| Column temperature (°C) | 25 | 100.1 | 8.22 | 1.30 | 1.46 | 5828 |
| 27 | 100.1 | 8.02 | 1.35 | 1.34 | 5856 | |
| 30 | 100.0 | 7.80 | 1.36 | 1.32 | 5944 | |
|
| ||||||
| Methanol in mobile phase | −0.2% | 100.0 | 8.42 | 1.33 | 1.38 | 6002 |
| +0.2% | 100.0 | 7.33 | 1.39 | 1.42 | 5549 | |
R : resolution; T -D: tailing factor of the drug; T -IS: tailing factor of the internal standard.
Forced degradations studies.
| Stress conditions | % remaining | % degradation | Retention time of degraded products |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acidic stress (1 N HCl, 50°C, 1 h) | 102.2 | — | 0.0 |
| High acidic stress (12 N HCl, 50°C, 48 h) | 31.8 | 68.2 | 0.0 |
| Alkaline stress (1 N NaOH, 50°C, 1 h) | 98.4 | 1.6 | 0.0 |
| High alkaline stress (10 N NaOH, 50°C, 48 h) | 89.8 | 10.2 | 1.46, 1.81 |
| Oxidative stress (3%, 50°C, 48 h) | 50.9 | 49.1 | 1.44 |
| Thermal stress (50°C, 5 days) | 89.4 | 10.6 | 0.0 |
| High thermal stress (100°C, 1 h) | 19.9 | 80.1 | 0.0 |
| Direct sunlight (48 h) | 95.1 | 4.9 | 0.0 |
| Aqueous stability (after 21 days) | 99.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 |
Figure 1Typical chromatogram of pentobarbital sodium and internal standard and their chemical structures.
Linearity data of the developed method.
| Initial conc. ( | Mean peak area ± S.D. | Mean peak area (IS) | Mean peak ratio | Actual conc. ( | % assay |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 4.285 ± 0.020 | 27.805 ± 0.192 | 0.154 ± 0.001 | 3.99 ± 1.29 | 79.8 |
| 10 | 8.637 ± 0.050 | 27.897 ± 0.284 | 0.310 ± 0.001 | 9.33 ± 1.29 | 93.3 |
| 20 | 17.098 ± 0.143 | 27.186 ± 1.093 | 0.630 ± 0.031 | 20.34 ± 1.19 | 101.7 |
| 50 | 42.565 ± 1.147 | 27.983 ± 0.376 | 1.521 ± 0.028 | 50.96 ± 1.20 | 101.9 |
| 100 | 83.084 ± 1.149 | 27.856 ± 0.111 | 2.983 ± 0.047 | 101.19 ± 1.14 | 101.2 |
| 200 | 164.194 ± 0.401 | 28.135 ± 0.253 | 5.836 ± 0.048 | 199.26 ± 1.13 | 99.6 |
|
| |||||
Precision study of the method.
|
Nominal conc. ( | Intraday precision | Interday precision | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calculated conc. | Accuracy | RSD | Calculated conc. | Accuracy | RSD | |
| 8 | 8.273 ± 0.009 | 3.42 | 0.11 | 8.181 ± 0.103 | 2.27 | 1.25 |
| 15 | 15.280 ± 0.143 | 1.86 | 0.94 | 15.052 ± 0.208 | 0.35 | 1.38 |
| 30 | 30.748 ± 0.632 | 2.49 | 2.06 | 30.355 ± 0.386 | 1.18 | 1.27 |
| 80 | 81.738 ± 0.602 | 2.17 | 0.74 | 81.257 ± 1,218 | 1.57 | 1.50 |
| 150 | 153.569 ± 0.328 | 2.38 | 0.21 | 152,278 ± 2,139 | 1.52 | 1.41 |
Accuracy of the method.
| Standard ( | Added | Found ( | % recovery | RSD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % |
| Mean ± SD, | Mean ± SD | ||
| 50 | 25 | 62.5 | 63.29 ± 0.48 | 101.27 ± 0.77 | 0.77 |
| 50 | 50 | 75 | 74.78 ± 0.56 | 99.71 ± 0.75 | 0.75 |
| 50 | 80 | 90 | 89.55 ± 2.61 | 99.49 ± 2.90 | 2.90 |
| 50 | 100 | 100 | 99.23 ± 1.22 | 99.23 ± 1.22 | 1.22 |
| 50 | 120 | 110 | 110.59 ± 0.28 | 100.53 ± 0.25 | 0.25 |
Figure 2Chromatogram of 12 N NaOH treated pentobarbital sodium at 50°C for 48 h.
Figure 3Chromatogram of 3% hydrogen peroxide treated pentobarbital sodium at 50°C for 48 h.