Literature DB >> 26543329

Evaluating the attractiveness of a new light rail extension: Testing simple change and displacement change hypotheses.

Carol M Werner1, Barbara B Brown2, Calvin P Tribby3, Doug Tharp4, Kristi Flick4, Harvey J Miller3, Ken R Smith2, Wyatt Jensen5.   

Abstract

Many communities in the United States have been adding new light rail to bus-predominant public transit systems. However, there is disagreement as to whether opening light rail lines attracts new ridership or merely draws ridership from existing transit users. We study a new light rail line in Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, which is part of a complete street redevelopment. We utilize a pre-test post-test control group quasi-experimental design to test two different measures of ridership change. The first measure is calculated from stops along the light rail route; the second assumes that nearby bus stops might be displaced by the rail and calculates ridership change with those stops included as baseline. Both the simple measure (transit use changes on the complete street light rail corridor) and the "displacement" measure (transit use changes in the one-quarter mile catchment areas around new light rail stops) showed significant (p < .01) and substantial (677%) increases in transit passengers compared to pre-light rail bus users. In particular, the displacement analysis discredits a common challenge that when a new light rail line opens, most passengers are simply former bus riders whose routes were canceled in favor of light rail. The study suggests that light rail services can attract additional ridership to public transit systems. In addition, although pre-post control-group designs require time and effort, this project underscores the benefits of such quasi-experimental designs in terms of the strength of the inferences that can be drawn about the impacts of new transit infrastructure and services.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bus; Complete streets; Light rail; Ridership

Year:  2016        PMID: 26543329      PMCID: PMC4629857          DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transp Policy (Oxf)        ISSN: 0967-070X


  2 in total

1.  How the built environment affects physical activity: views from urban planning.

Authors:  Susan L Handy; Marlon G Boarnet; Reid Ewing; Richard E Killingsworth
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 2.  Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence.

Authors:  Darren E R Warburton; Crystal Whitney Nicol; Shannon S D Bredin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 8.262

  2 in total
  3 in total

1.  Walkability, complete streets, and gender: Who benefits most?

Authors:  Wyatt A Jensen; Tammy K Stump; Barbara B Brown; Carol M Werner; Ken R Smith
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.078

2.  Correlates of Walking for Travel in Seven European Cities: The PASTA Project.

Authors:  Mireia Gascon; Thomas Götschi; Audrey de Nazelle; Esther Gracia; Albert Ambròs; Sandra Márquez; Oriol Marquet; Ione Avila-Palencia; Christian Brand; Francesco Iacorossi; Elisabeth Raser; Mailin Gaupp-Berghausen; Evi Dons; Michelle Laeremans; Sonja Kahlmeier; Julian Sánchez; Regine Gerike; Esther Anaya-Boig; Luc Int Panis; Mark Nieuwenhuijsen
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 9.031

3.  The TROLLEY Study: assessing travel, health, and equity impacts of a new light rail transit investment during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Katie Crist; Tarik Benmarhnia; Lawrence D Frank; Dana Song; Elizabeth Zunshine; James F Sallis
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 4.135

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.