Literature DB >> 26542971

Tap Arduino: An Arduino microcontroller for low-latency auditory feedback in sensorimotor synchronization experiments.

Benjamin G Schultz1, Floris T van Vugt2.   

Abstract

Timing abilities are often measured by having participants tap their finger along with a metronome and presenting tap-triggered auditory feedback. These experiments predominantly use electronic percussion pads combined with software (e.g., FTAP or Max/MSP) that records responses and delivers auditory feedback. However, these setups involve unknown latencies between tap onset and auditory feedback and can sometimes miss responses or record multiple, superfluous responses for a single tap. These issues may distort measurements of tapping performance or affect the performance of the individual. We present an alternative setup using an Arduino microcontroller that addresses these issues and delivers low-latency auditory feedback. We validated our setup by having participants (N = 6) tap on a force-sensitive resistor pad connected to the Arduino and on an electronic percussion pad with various levels of force and tempi. The Arduino delivered auditory feedback through a pulse-width modulation (PWM) pin connected to a headphone jack or a wave shield component. The Arduino's PWM (M = 0.6 ms, SD = 0.3) and wave shield (M = 2.6 ms, SD = 0.3) demonstrated significantly lower auditory feedback latencies than the percussion pad (M = 9.1 ms, SD = 2.0), FTAP (M = 14.6 ms, SD = 2.8), and Max/MSP (M = 15.8 ms, SD = 3.4). The PWM and wave shield latencies were also significantly less variable than those from FTAP and Max/MSP. The Arduino missed significantly fewer taps, and recorded fewer superfluous responses, than the percussion pad. The Arduino captured all responses, whereas at lower tapping forces, the percussion pad missed more taps. Regardless of tapping force, the Arduino outperformed the percussion pad. Overall, the Arduino is a high-precision, low-latency, portable, and affordable tool for auditory experiments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory feedback; Microcontrollers; Motor timing; Musical Instrument Digital Interface (MIDI); Sensorimotor synchronization

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26542971     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-015-0671-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  10 in total

1.  Vibrotactile piezoelectric stimulation system with precise and versatile timing control for somatosensory research.

Authors:  Limin Sun; Yoshio Okada
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  The Schultz MIDI Benchmarking Toolbox for MIDI interfaces, percussion pads, and sound cards.

Authors:  Benjamin G Schultz
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2019-02

3.  The rediscovered motor-related area 55b emerges as a core hub of music perception.

Authors:  Netanell Avisdris; Ofir Shany; Tali Siman-Tov; Carlos R Gordon; Avigail Lerner; Omer Shuster; Roni Y Granot; Talma Hendler
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-10-18

4.  The effects of individualised intermittent theta burst stimulation in the prefrontal cortex: A TMS-EEG study.

Authors:  Sung Wook Chung; Caley M Sullivan; Nigel C Rogasch; Kate E Hoy; Neil W Bailey; Robin F H Cash; Paul B Fitzgerald
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  A simple and cheap setup for timing tapping responses synchronized to auditory stimuli.

Authors:  Martin A Miguel; Pablo Riera; Diego Fernandez Slezak
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-08-03

6.  The TeensyTap Framework for Sensorimotor Synchronization Experiments.

Authors:  Floris Tijmen van Vugt
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2020-09-17

7.  REPP: A robust cross-platform solution for online sensorimotor synchronization experiments.

Authors:  Manuel Anglada-Tort; Peter M C Harrison; Nori Jacoby
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-02-11

8.  The Groove Enhancement Machine (GEM): A Multi-Person Adaptive Metronome to Manipulate Sensorimotor Synchronization and Subjective Enjoyment.

Authors:  Lauren K Fink; Prescott C Alexander; Petr Janata
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.473

9.  Open Source Tools for Temporally Controlled Rodent Behavior Suitable for Electrophysiology and Optogenetic Manipulations.

Authors:  Nicola Solari; Katalin Sviatkó; Tamás Laszlovszky; Panna Hegedüs; Balázs Hangya
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-15

10.  Stop signals delay synchrony more for finger tapping than vocalization: a dual modality study of rhythmic synchronization in the stop signal task.

Authors:  Leidy J Castro-Meneses; Paul F Sowman
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 2.984

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.