OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: To describe clinically relevant between-group differences in MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) scores among head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in 1,136 HNC patients seen for modified barium swallow (MBS) studies. METHODS: The MDADI was administered by written questionnaire at the MBS appointment. MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory global, composite, and subscale scores were calculated. Anchor-based methods were employed to determine clinically meaningful between-group differences by feeding tube status, aspiration status (per MBS study), and diet level. RESULTS: Mean MDADI scores for the 1,136 patients were: emotional 65.8 ± 17.3, functional 68.1 ± 19.6, physical 60.1 ± 18.6, global 59.3 ± 28.3, and composite 64.0 ± 17.1. Three hundred seventy-eight patients (33%) were feeding tube-dependent; 395 (34.8%) were aspirators; 122 (11%) were nothing per oral (Performance Status Scale-Head and Neck [PSS-HN] diet = 0); and 249 (22%) ate unrestricted, regular diets (PSS-HN diet = 100). Statistically significant (P < 0.0001) between-group differences (feeding tube vs. no feeding tube, aspirator vs. nonaspirator, oral vs. nonoral diet, PSS-HN diet levels) were observed for all mean MDADI scores (global, composite, and subscales). A mean difference of 10 points in composite MDADI scores differentiated feeding tube-dependent from nontube-dependent patients, aspirators from nonaspirators, and distinct PSS-HN diet levels. CONCLUSIONS: We identify that a 10-point between-group difference in composite MDADI scores was associated with clinically meaningful between-group differences in swallowing function. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 126:1108-1113, 2016.
OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: To describe clinically relevant between-group differences in MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) scores among head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in 1,136 HNC patients seen for modified barium swallow (MBS) studies. METHODS: The MDADI was administered by written questionnaire at the MBS appointment. MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory global, composite, and subscale scores were calculated. Anchor-based methods were employed to determine clinically meaningful between-group differences by feeding tube status, aspiration status (per MBS study), and diet level. RESULTS: Mean MDADI scores for the 1,136 patients were: emotional 65.8 ± 17.3, functional 68.1 ± 19.6, physical 60.1 ± 18.6, global 59.3 ± 28.3, and composite 64.0 ± 17.1. Three hundred seventy-eight patients (33%) were feeding tube-dependent; 395 (34.8%) were aspirators; 122 (11%) were nothing per oral (Performance Status Scale-Head and Neck [PSS-HN] diet = 0); and 249 (22%) ate unrestricted, regular diets (PSS-HN diet = 100). Statistically significant (P < 0.0001) between-group differences (feeding tube vs. no feeding tube, aspirator vs. nonaspirator, oral vs. nonoral diet, PSS-HN diet levels) were observed for all mean MDADI scores (global, composite, and subscales). A mean difference of 10 points in composite MDADI scores differentiated feeding tube-dependent from nontube-dependent patients, aspirators from nonaspirators, and distinct PSS-HN diet levels. CONCLUSIONS: We identify that a 10-point between-group difference in composite MDADI scores was associated with clinically meaningful between-group differences in swallowing function. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 126:1108-1113, 2016.
Authors: Eileen Huh Shinn; Karen Basen-Engquist; George Baum; Sven Steen; Rachel Freeman Bauman; William Morrison; Adam Seth Garden; Cathleen Sheil; Kelly Kilgore; Katherine A Hutcheson; Denise Barringer; Ying Yuan; Jan S Lewin Journal: Head Neck Date: 2013-10-21 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Katherine A Hutcheson; Jan S Lewin; F Christopher Holsinger; Ganene Steinhaus; Asher Lisec; Denise A Barringer; Heather Y Lin; Sandra Villalobos; Adam S Garden; Vali Papadimitrakopoulou; Merrill S Kies Journal: Head Neck Date: 2013-06-18 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Puja Aggarwal; Jhankruti S Zaveri; Ryan P Goepfert; Qiuling Shi; Xianglin L Du; Michael Swartz; G Brandon Gunn; Stephen Y Lai; C David Fuller; Ehab Y Hanna; David I Rosenthal; Jan S Lewin; Linda B Piller; Katherine A Hutcheson Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Puja Aggarwal; Jhankruti S Zaveri; Ryan P Goepfert; Qiuling Shi; Xianglin L Du; Michael Swartz; Stephen Y Lai; C David Fuller; Jan S Lewin; Linda B Piller; Katherine A Hutcheson Journal: Head Neck Date: 2019-08-23 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Ryan P Goepfert; Jan S Lewin; Martha P Barrow; G Brandon Gunn; C David Fuller; Beth M Beadle; Adam S Garden; David I Rosenthal; Merrill S Kies; Vassiliki Papadimitrakopoulou; Stephen Y Lai; Neil D Gross; David L Schwartz; Katherine A Hutcheson Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2016-06-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Hoda Badr; Maximiliano Sobrero; Joshua Chen; Tamar Kotz; Eric Genden; Andrew G Sikora; Brett Miles Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2019-02-11 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Ryan P Goepfert; Jan S Lewin; Martha P Barrow; C David Fuller; Stephen Y Lai; Juhee Song; Brian P Hobbs; G Brandon Gunn; Beth M Beadle; David I Rosenthal; Adam S Garden; Merrill S Kies; Vali A Papadimitrakopoulou; David L Schwartz; Katherine A Hutcheson Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2016-07-21 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Nedeljko Jovanovic; Colleen Dreyer; Sarah Hawkins; Kendra Thouless; David Palma; Philip C Doyle; Julie A Theurer Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 3.603