Literature DB >> 26542515

Clinical application and potential effects of 2014 hypertension guidelines on incident cardiovascular events.

Min Jung Ko1, Chan Mi Park1, Yun Jung Kim1, Shin Hee Kang1, Duk-Woo Park2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The applicability to real-world hypertensive patients and the potential effects on future cardiovascular events of the 2014 hypertension guidelines of the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC-8) remain to be determined.
METHODS: Using the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey of 2008 to 2012 (n = 30,697), we estimated the proportion of Korean adults eligible for hypertension therapy under the 2014 JNC-8 and previous JNC-7 guidelines and the changes affected by the 2014 guidelines. Using the validation cohort (n = 116,767) from the 2003 National Health Examination with 7 years of follow-up, we determined the clinical effects of recent recommendations changes on incident cardiovascular events (composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke).
RESULTS: Compared with the JNC-7 guidelines, the 2014 guidelines would decrease the number of adults eligible for hypertension therapy from 10.1 million (28.2%) to 9.3 million (25.9%). In the validation cohort, compared with nonhypertensive adults, those eligible for hypertension therapy under the JNC-7 or JNC-8 guidelines had significantly higher risks of cardiovascular events (hazard ratio [HR], 5.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.58-5.57, P < 0.001; and HR, 5.11; 95% CI, 4.63-5.64, P < 0.001, respectively). In addition, adults newly ineligible for treatment under the 2014 guidelines had an increased risk of cardiovascular events relative to nonhypertensive adults (HR, 4.36; 95% CI, 3.65-5.20; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The 2014 hypertension guidelines would modestly decrease the proportion of Korean adults eligible for hypertension therapy. Adults newly ineligible for hypertension therapy by the 2014 guidelines have a higher risk of cardiovascular events compared to nonhypertensive adults. Our observations should be confirmed or refuted through large, randomized clinical trials.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26542515     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.07.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  4 in total

1.  Assessment of Satisfaction with Drug Provision of Antihypertensive Drugs at the Outpatient Level of Privileged Categories of Residens.

Authors:  Abuov Jamil; Kalmakhanov Sundetgali; Seiduanova Laura; Tekmanova Ainur; Toksanbayev Daniyar; Pazilov Sabit; Kemelbekov Kanatzhan
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2022-04-08

2.  Antihypertensive drug prescription patterns and their impact on outcome of blood pressure in Ethiopia: a hospital-based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Tadesse Melaku Abegaz; Yonas Getaye Tefera; Tamrat Befekadu Abebe
Journal:  Integr Pharm Res Pract       Date:  2017-01-27

3.  Metformin use and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease: a nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Min-Ho Kim; Hyung Jung Oh; Soon Hyo Kwon; Jin Seok Jeon; Hyunjin Noh; Dong Cheol Han; Hyoungnae Kim; Dong-Ryeol Ryu
Journal:  Kidney Res Clin Pract       Date:  2021-11-29

4.  Sex differences in the blood pressure level associated with increased risks of cardiovascular events: a Korean nationwide population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Youn Kyung Kee; Min-Ho Kim; Jongmin Oh; Hyung Jung Oh; Dong-Ryeol Ryu
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 3.738

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.