Literature DB >> 26542464

Should we still use motor vehicle intrusion as a sole triage criterion for the use of trauma center resources?

Kazuhide Matsushima1, Konstantinos Chouliaras2, William Koenig3, Christy Preston3, Deidre Gorospe3, Demetrios Demetriades2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Motor vehicle intrusion (MVI) is one of the field triage criteria recommended by the American College of Surgeons Committee of Trauma (ACS-COT) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). However, the evidence supporting its validity is scarce. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of this criterion and assess its impact on overtriage or undertriage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study based on the Los Angeles County Trauma and Emergency Medicine Information System (TEMIS) Trauma database. Included in the analysis were patients with MVI as the sole criterion for trauma center triage. Physiological characteristics, severity of injury, and outcomes of the MVI patients were compared between different age groups. Further, a logistic regression model was used to identify factors significantly associated with the need for trauma center resources.
RESULTS: During the period 2002-2012, a total of 10,554 trauma patients involved in motor vehicle crashes had documentation of MVI. A subgroup of 3998 patients (37.9%) did not meet any other criteria that require immediate transportation to a designated trauma center. Only 0.7% of these patients had hypotension and 0.1% had deterioration of the Glasgow Coma Scale on admission to the emergency room. Overall, 18.8% of patients required trauma center resources defined as intubation in the emergency room, certain surgical procedures, in-hospital death, or intensive care unit admission. Age ≥65 years, male gender, prehospital heart rate >100/min, and systolic blood pressure <110 mmHg were significantly associated with the need for trauma center resources.
CONCLUSIONS: The MVI itself did not appear to be a strong indicator for the use of trauma center resources and is associated with excessive overtriage. However, age >65 years, systolic blood pressure <110 mmHg, and heart rate >100/min were significant predictors for the need of trauma center resources. The MVI criterion should be refined for better utilization of trauma center resources.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Motor vehicle intrusion; Prehospital; Trauma center; Triage criteria

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26542464     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  4 in total

1.  A Consensus-Based Criterion Standard for the Requirement of a Trauma Team.

Authors:  Christian Waydhas; Markus Baake; Lars Becker; Boris Buck; Helena Düsing; Björn Heindl; Kai Oliver Jensen; Rolf Lefering; Carsten Mand; T Paffrath; Uwe Schweigkofler; Kai Sprengel; Heiko Trentzsch; Bernd Wohlrath; Dan Bieler
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  New cars on the highways: Trends in injuries and outcomes following ejection.

Authors:  Nicholas Manguso; Galinos Barmparas; Navpreet K Dhillon; Eric J Ley; Raymond Huang; Nicolas Melo; Rodrigo F Alban; Daniel R Margulies
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2019-10-22

Review 3.  [Optimization of criteria for activation of trauma teams : Avoidance of overtriage and undertriage].

Authors:  D Bieler; H Trentzsch; M Baacke; L Becker; H Düsing; B Heindl; K O Jensen; R Lefering; C Mand; O Özkurtul; T Paffrath; U Schweigkofler; K Sprengel; B Wohlrath; C Waydhas
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Mechanism of injury and special considerations as predictive of serious injury: A systematic review.

Authors:  Joshua R Lupton; Cynthia Davis-O'Reilly; Rebecca M Jungbauer; Craig D Newgard; Mary E Fallat; Joshua B Brown; N Clay Mann; Gregory J Jurkovich; Eileen Bulger; Mark L Gestring; E Brooke Lerner; Roger Chou; Annette M Totten
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 5.221

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.