Literature DB >> 26542458

Review of Environmental Assessment Case Studies Blending Elements of Risk Assessment and Life Cycle Assessment.

Robin Harder1, Hanna Holmquist1, Sverker Molander2, Magdalena Svanström1, Gregory M Peters1.   

Abstract

Risk assessment (RA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) are two analytical tools used to support decision making in environmental management. This study reviewed 30 environmental assessment case studies that claimed an integration, combination, hybridization, or complementary use of RA and LCA. The focus of the analysis was on how the respective case studies evaluated emissions of chemical pollutants and pathogens. The analysis revealed three clusters of similar case studies. Yet, there seemed to be little consensus as to what should be referred to as RA and LCA, and when to speak of combination, integration, hybridization, or complementary use of RA and LCA. This paper provides clear recommendations toward a more stringent and consistent use of terminology. Blending elements of RA and LCA offers multifaceted opportunities to adapt a given environmental assessment case study to a specific decision making context, but also requires awareness of several implications and potential pitfalls, of which six are discussed in this paper. To facilitate a better understanding and more transparent communication of the nature of a given case study, this paper proposes a "design space" (i.e., identification framework) for environmental assessment case studies blending elements of RA and LCA. Thinking in terms of a common design space, we postulate, can increase clarity and transparency when communicating the design and results of a given assessment together with its potential strengths and weaknesses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26542458     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  7 in total

1.  Integrate life-cycle assessment and risk analysis results, not methods.

Authors:  Igor Linkov; Benjamin D Trump; Ben A Wender; Thomas P Seager; Alan J Kennedy; Jeffrey M Keisler
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 39.213

2.  Quantitative health risk assessment of inhalation exposure to automobile foundry dust.

Authors:  Ruipeng Tong; Mengzhao Cheng; Xiaofei Ma; Yunyun Yang; Yafei Liu; Jianfeng Li
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  Evaluating nanotechnology opportunities and risks through integration of life-cycle and risk assessment.

Authors:  Michael P Tsang; Emi Kikuchi-Uehara; Guido W Sonnemann; Cyril Aymonier; Masahiko Hirao
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 39.213

4.  Setting the stage for debating the roles of risk assessment and life-cycle assessment of engineered nanomaterials.

Authors:  Jeroen B Guinée; Reinout Heijungs; Martina G Vijver; Willie J G M Peijnenburg
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 39.213

5.  Enhancing life cycle chemical exposure assessment through ontology modeling.

Authors:  David E Meyer; Sidney C Bailin; Daniel Vallero; Peter P Egeghy; Shi V Liu; Elaine A Cohen Hubal
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Conceptual Framework To Extend Life Cycle Assessment Using Near-Field Human Exposure Modeling and High-Throughput Tools for Chemicals.

Authors:  Susan A Csiszar; David E Meyer; Kathie L Dionisio; Peter Egeghy; Kristin K Isaacs; Paul S Price; Kelly A Scanlon; Yu-Mei Tan; Kent Thomas; Daniel Vallero; Jane C Bare
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Carp (Cyprinidae) Fisheries in Swedish Lakes: A Combined Environmental Assessment Approach to Evaluate Data-limited Freshwater Fish Resources as Food.

Authors:  Sara Hornborg; Anton Främberg
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.266

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.