Literature DB >> 26541377

Understanding the nonlinear physiological and behavioral effects of tDCS through computational neurostimulation.

James J Bonaiuto1, Sven Bestmann2.   

Abstract

Despite the success of noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS), the mechanism of action through which different stimulation techniques interact with information processing in targeted neural circuits largely remains unknown. Applying neurostimulation in silico to computational models with biophysical plausibility provides one route to interrogate the possible mechanisms through which stimulation interacts with neural circuits, and generate predictions about the resultant behavior. Here, we address the recent observation that the physiological and behavioral effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) might be nonlinear with regard to stimulation intensity or duration. We simulate neurostimulation in an established, biophysically informed neural network attractor model that generates simple behavioral choices and thus allows for assessing the impact of stimulation on both neural dynamics and behavior. We demonstrate that nonlinear effects of stimulation intensity on the accuracy and decision time of the model can arise from a limit on the integration rate of the network, nonlinear effects of stimulation on neural firing rates before the onset of the stimulus, and the inhibitory effect of hyperpolarizing stimulation on pyramidal neurons. We thus present a detailed modeling treatment of nonlinear tDCS effects during a behavioral task, and provide detailed hypotheses about the neural causes that lead to observed nonlinear behavioral effects during stimulation. This framework can provide a blueprint for future work on the neural and behavioral consequences of NIBS in health and disease.
© 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biophysical model; Neural attractor model; Transcranial direct current stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26541377     DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2015.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Brain Res        ISSN: 0079-6123            Impact factor:   2.453


  9 in total

Review 1.  Incomplete evidence that increasing current intensity of tDCS boosts outcomes.

Authors:  Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Paola Marangolo; Benjamin M Hampstead; Sven Bestmann; Elisabeth Galletta; Helena Knotkova; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Impact of brain atrophy on tDCS and HD-tDCS current flow: a modeling study in three variants of primary progressive aphasia.

Authors:  Gozde Unal; Bronte Ficek; Kimberly Webster; Syed Shahabuddin; Dennis Truong; Benjamin Hampstead; Marom Bikson; Kyrana Tsapkini
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 3.  Guiding transcranial brain stimulation by EEG/MEG to interact with ongoing brain activity and associated functions: A position paper.

Authors:  Gregor Thut; Til Ole Bergmann; Flavio Fröhlich; Surjo R Soekadar; John-Stuart Brittain; Antoni Valero-Cabré; Alexander T Sack; Carlo Miniussi; Andrea Antal; Hartwig Roman Siebner; Ulf Ziemann; Christoph S Herrmann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-29       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Combining brain stimulation and video game to promote long-term transfer of learning and cognitive enhancement.

Authors:  Chung Yen Looi; Mihaela Duta; Anna-Katharine Brem; Stefan Huber; Hans-Christoph Nuerk; Roi Cohen Kadosh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  No consistent effect of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Roya Jalali; R Chris Miall; Joseph M Galea
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Does 10-Hz Cathodal Oscillating Current of the Parieto-Occipital Lobe Modulate Target Detection?

Authors:  Sarah S Sheldon; Kyle E Mathewson
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Using Biophysical Models to Understand the Effect of tDCS on Neurorehabilitation: Searching for Optimal Covariates to Enhance Poststroke Recovery.

Authors:  Paola Malerba; Sofia Straudi; Felipe Fregni; Maxim Bazhenov; Nino Basaglia
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Response repetition biases in human perceptual decisions are explained by activity decay in competitive attractor models.

Authors:  James J Bonaiuto; Archy de Berker; Sven Bestmann
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Selective alteration of human value decisions with medial frontal tDCS is predicted by changes in attractor dynamics.

Authors:  D Hämmerer; J Bonaiuto; M Klein-Flügge; M Bikson; S Bestmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.