Literature DB >> 26541241

Sleep-stage sequencing of sleep-onset REM periods in MSLT predicts treatment response in patients with narcolepsy.

Panagis Drakatos1, Kishankumar Patel1, Chiraag Thakrar1, Adrian J Williams1,2, Brian D Kent1, Guy D Leschziner1,3.   

Abstract

Current treatment recommendations for narcolepsy suggest that modafinil should be used as a first-line treatment ahead of conventional stimulants or sodium oxybate. In this study, performed in a tertiary sleep disorders centre, treatment responses were examined following these recommendations, and the ability of sleep-stage sequencing of sleep-onset rapid eye movement periods in the multiple sleep latency test to predict treatment response. Over a 3.5-year period, 255 patients were retrospectively identified in the authors' database as patients diagnosed with narcolepsy, type 1 (with cataplexy) or type 2 (without) using clinical and polysomnographic criteria. Eligible patients were examined in detail, sleep study data were abstracted and sleep-stage sequencing of sleep-onset rapid eye movement periods were analysed. Response to treatment was graded utilizing an internally developed scale. Seventy-five patients were included (39% males). Forty (53%) were diagnosed with type 1 narcolepsy with a mean follow-up of 2.37 ± 1.35 years. Ninety-seven percent of the patients were initially started on modafinil, and overall 59% reported complete response on the last follow-up. Twenty-nine patients (39%) had the sequence of sleep stage 1 or wake to rapid eye movement in all of their sleep-onset rapid eye movement periods, with most of these diagnosed as narcolepsy type 1 (72%). The presence of this specific sleep-stage sequence in all sleep-onset rapid eye movement periods was associated with worse treatment response (P = 0.0023). Sleep-stage sequence analysis of sleep-onset rapid eye movement periods in the multiple sleep latency test may aid the prediction of treatment response in narcoleptics and provide a useful prognostic tool in clinical practice, above and beyond their classification as narcolepsy type 1 or 2.
© 2015 European Sleep Research Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NT1; NT2; prognostication; treatment outcome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26541241     DOI: 10.1111/jsr.12363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sleep Res        ISSN: 0962-1105            Impact factor:   3.981


  2 in total

Review 1.  Clinical update on central hypersomnias.

Authors:  Laura Pérez-Carbonell; Guy Leschziner
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Effectiveness and side-effect profile of stimulant therapy as monotherapy and in combination in the central hypersomnias in clinical practice.

Authors:  Chiraag Thakrar; Kishankumar Patel; Grainne D'ancona; Brian D Kent; Alexander Nesbitt; Hugh Selsick; Joerg Steier; Ivana Rosenzweig; Adrian J Williams; Guy D Leschziner; Panagis Drakatos
Journal:  J Sleep Res       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 3.981

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.