Literature DB >> 26541215

Assessment of femur geometrical parameters using EOS™ imaging technology in patients with atypical femur fractures; preliminary results.

Suzanne N Morin1, Michelle Wall2, Etienne L Belzile3, Benoit Godbout4, Thomas P Moser5, Laëtitia Michou3, Louis-Georges Ste-Marie5, Jacques A de Guise5, Elham Rahme6, Jacques P Brown3.   

Abstract

Atypical femur fractures (AFF) arise in the subtrochanteric and diaphyseal regions. Because of this unique distribution, we hypothesized that patients with AFF demonstrate specific geometrical variations of their lower limb whereby baseline tensile forces applied to the lateral cortex are higher and might favor the appearance of these rare stress fractures, when exposed to bisphosphonates. Using the low irradiation 2D-3D X-ray scanner EOS™ imaging technology we aimed to characterize and compare femur geometric parameters between women who sustained bisphosphonate-associated AFF and those who had experienced similar duration of exposure to bisphosphonates but did not sustain fractures. Conditional logistic regression models were constructed to estimate the association between selected geometric parameters and the occurrence of AFF. We identified 16 Caucasian women with AFF and recruited 16 ethnicity-, sex-, age-, height- and cumulative bisphosphonate exposure-matched controls from local osteoporosis clinics. Compared to controls, those with AFF had more lateral femur bowing (-3.2° SD [3.4] versus -0.8° SD [1.9] p=0.02). In regression analysis, lateral femur bowing was associated with the risk of AFF (aOR 1.54; 95% CI 1.04-2.28, p=0.03). Women who sustained a subtrochanteric AFF demonstrated a lesser femoral neck shaft angle (varus geometry) than those with a fracture at a diaphyseal site (121.9 [3.6]° versus 127.6 [7.2]°, p=0.07), whereas femur bowing was more prominent in those with a diaphyseal fracture compared to those with a subtrochanteric fracture (-4.3 [3.2]° versus -0.9 [2.7]°, p=0.07). Our analyses support that subjects with AFF exhibit femoral geometry parameters that result in higher tensile mechanical load on the lateral femur. This may play a critical role in the pathogenesis of AFF and requires further evaluation in a larger size population.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atypical femur fracture; Bisphosphonates; Femur geometry; Imaging; Registry

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26541215     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  9 in total

1.  Atypical femur fractures: a survey of current practices in orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  P S Schneider; M Wall; J P Brown; A M Cheung; E J Harvey; S N Morin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  The Role of Lower-Limb Geometry in the Pathophysiology of Atypical Femoral Fracture.

Authors:  Ifaz T Haider; Prism S Schneider; W Brent Edwards
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 3.  Evaluation and management of atypical femoral fractures: an update of current knowledge.

Authors:  O Pearce; T Edwards; K Al-Hourani; M Kelly; A Riddick
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-02-15

4.  Lateral fixation: an alternative surgical approach in the prevention of complete atypical femoral fractures.

Authors:  Mohammad Kharazmi; Karl Michaëlsson; Pär Hallberg; Jörg Schilcher
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-09-18

5.  Atypical Femoral Shaft Fractures in Female Bisphosphonate Users Were Associated with an Increased Anterolateral Femoral Bow and a Thicker Lateral Cortex: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Seung Pil Jang; Ingwon Yeo; Sang-Yeon So; Keunbyuel Kim; Young-Wan Moon; Youn-Soo Park; Seung-Jae Lim
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Atypical femur fracture in a woman with osteogenesis imperfecta and multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Yuxi Chen; Michael Sebag; Thomas I Powell; Suzanne N Morin
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 2.041

7.  Differences in femur geometry and bone markers in atypical femur fractures and the general population.

Authors:  Ik Jae Jung; Ji Wan Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Atypical Femoral Fracture in a Patient without Bisphosphonate or Denosumab Exposure-A Case Report.

Authors:  George F Georgiadis; Dimitrios G Begkas; Konstantinos A Maniatis; Alexandros E Vasilakis; Stamatios Theodoros D Chatzopoulos; Alexia P Balanika
Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep       Date:  2021-10

9.  Biomechanical analysis of the correlation between mid-shaft atypical femoral fracture (AFF) and axial varus deformation.

Authors:  Mathieu Severyns; Dalila Belaid; Kevin Aubert; Ali Bouchoucha; Arnaud Germaneau; Tanguy Vendeuvre
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 2.359

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.