Literature DB >> 26540089

Bayesian Estimation of Conditional Independence Graphs Improves Functional Connectivity Estimates.

Max Hinne1,2, Ronald J Janssen2, Tom Heskes1, Marcel A J van Gerven2.   

Abstract

Functional connectivity concerns the correlated activity between neuronal populations in spatially segregated regions of the brain, which may be studied using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). This coupled activity is conveniently expressed using covariance, but this measure fails to distinguish between direct and indirect effects. A popular alternative that addresses this issue is partial correlation, which regresses out the signal of potentially confounding variables, resulting in a measure that reveals only direct connections. Importantly, provided the data are normally distributed, if two variables are conditionally independent given all other variables, their respective partial correlation is zero. In this paper, we propose a probabilistic generative model that allows us to estimate functional connectivity in terms of both partial correlations and a graph representing conditional independencies. Simulation results show that this methodology is able to outperform the graphical LASSO, which is the de facto standard for estimating partial correlations. Furthermore, we apply the model to estimate functional connectivity for twenty subjects using resting-state fMRI data. Results show that our model provides a richer representation of functional connectivity as compared to considering partial correlations alone. Finally, we demonstrate how our approach can be extended in several ways, for instance to achieve data fusion by informing the conditional independence graph with data from probabilistic tractography. As our Bayesian formulation of functional connectivity provides access to the posterior distribution instead of only to point estimates, we are able to quantify the uncertainty associated with our results. This reveals that while we are able to infer a clear backbone of connectivity in our empirical results, the data are not accurately described by simply looking at the mode of the distribution over connectivity. The implication of this is that deterministic alternatives may misjudge connectivity results by drawing conclusions from noisy and limited data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26540089      PMCID: PMC4634993          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol        ISSN: 1553-734X            Impact factor:   4.475


  56 in total

Review 1.  The future of FMRI connectivity.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  On the use of correlation as a measure of network connectivity.

Authors:  Andrew Zalesky; Alex Fornito; Ed Bullmore
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  Large-scale brain networks in cognition: emerging methods and principles.

Authors:  Steven L Bressler; Vinod Menon
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Dynamic causal modelling.

Authors:  K J Friston; L Harrison; W Penny
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Contributions and challenges for network models in cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  Olaf Sporns
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Estimation of functional connectivity in fMRI data using stability selection-based sparse partial correlation with elastic net penalty.

Authors:  Srikanth Ryali; Tianwen Chen; Kaustubh Supekar; Vinod Menon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Functional connectivity in resting-state fMRI: is linear correlation sufficient?

Authors:  Jaroslav Hlinka; Milan Palus; Martin Vejmelka; Dante Mantini; Maurizio Corbetta
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  The human dorsal hippocampal commissure. An anatomically identifiable and functional pathway.

Authors:  P Gloor; V Salanova; A Olivier; L F Quesney
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 9.  FSL.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Quantifying uncertainty in brain network measures using Bayesian connectomics.

Authors:  Ronald J Janssen; Max Hinne; Tom Heskes; Marcel A J van Gerven
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 2.380

View more
  5 in total

1.  Combining Multiple Functional Connectivity Methods to Improve Causal Inferences.

Authors:  Ruben Sanchez-Romero; Michael W Cole
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Connectomic Analysis of Brain Networks: Novel Techniques and Future Directions.

Authors:  J Leonie Cazemier; Francisco Clascá; Paul H E Tiesinga
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.856

3.  Resting-state subcortical functional connectivity in HIV-infected patients on long-term cART.

Authors:  Marloes A M Janssen; Max Hinne; Ronald J Janssen; Marcel A van Gerven; Stefan C Steens; Bozena Góraj; Peter P Koopmans; Roy P C Kessels
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.978

4.  Increasing robustness of pairwise methods for effective connectivity in magnetic resonance imaging by using fractional moment series of BOLD signal distributions.

Authors:  Natalia Z Bielczyk; Alberto Llera; Jan K Buitelaar; Jeffrey C Glennon; Christian F Beckmann
Journal:  Netw Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-01

5.  Multi-subject hierarchical inverse covariance modelling improves estimation of functional brain networks.

Authors:  Giles L Colclough; Mark W Woolrich; Samuel J Harrison; Pedro A Rojas López; Pedro A Valdes-Sosa; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 6.556

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.