| Literature DB >> 26539332 |
Yang Jia1, Miao Zhang2, Wenpeng Jiang1, Zhiping Zhang1, Shiting Huang2, Zhou Wang1.
Abstract
Background. Recent studies have shown that the aberrant expression of IFITM3 is implicated in the lymph node metastasis of many malignancies. Our research aimed to investigate the expression of IFITM3 in pathological N0 (pN0) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and its relationship with lymph node metastatic recurrence. Methods. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to examine the expression profile of IFITM3 in 104 pairs of samples. Each pair consisted of ESCC tissue and its adjacent normal mucosa (ANM). This aberrant expression was verified by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) with 20 tumor specimens with strong immunostaining and their mucosal tissues. In addition, 20 samples of low expression tissues and their ANMs were evaluated. Moreover, the correlations between the IFITM3 expression level and the clinicopathological variables, recurrence risk and overall survival (OS) of patients were analyzed. Results. Both IHC and RT-PCR demonstrated that the IFITM3 expression level was significantly higher in tumor tissue than in ANM. Statistical analysis showed a significant correlation of IFITM3 expression with the T status of esophageal cancer (p = 0.015). In addition, IFITM3 overexpression was demonstrated to be not only an important risk factor of lymphatic metastatic recurrence but a significant prognostic factor in pN0 ESCC (p < 0.005). Conclusions. Even pN0 ESCC patients will still experience lymphatic metastatic recurrence. The IFITM3 gene could be a predictor of lymphatic metastatic recurrence in pN0 ESCC after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.Entities:
Keywords: ESCC; Esophagectomy; IFITM3; Lymphatic metastatic recurrence
Year: 2015 PMID: 26539332 PMCID: PMC4631461 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1355
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Correlation of IFITM3 expression with clinicopathological characteristics of pN0 ESCC patients.
| Variables | No. of patients | IFITM3 expression | 3-year recurrence rate (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High | Low | |||||
| 59 | 45 | |||||
| Age (years) | 0.335 | 0.550 | ||||
| ≥50 | 83 | 45 | 38 | 42.2 | ||
| <50 | 21 | 14 | 7 | 33.3 | ||
| Gender | 0.365 | 0.889 | ||||
| Male | 78 | 42 | 36 | 41.0 | ||
| Female | 26 | 17 | 9 | 38.5 | ||
| Tumor size (cm) | 0.418 | 0.193 | ||||
| ≥5 | 40 | 25 | 15 | 47.5 | ||
| <5 | 64 | 34 | 30 | 35.9 | ||
| T status | 0.015 |
| ||||
| T1 + T2 | 41 | 30 | 11 | 24.4 | ||
| T3 | 55 | 24 | 31 | 49.1 | ||
| T4a | 8 | 5 | 3 | 62.5 | ||
| Differentiation degree | 0.249 | 0.111 | ||||
| Low | 25 | 17 | 8 | 52.0 | ||
| Moderate-high | 79 | 42 | 37 | 36.7 | ||
| IFITM3 overexpression |
| |||||
| Yes | 59 | 50.8 | ||||
| No | 45 | 26.7 | ||||
Notes.
χ2 test.
Log-rank test.
Figure 1Immunohistochemistry assay of IFITM3 in ESCC tissue and ANM.
(A) Negative expression of IFITM3 in ANM (×200, ×400). (B) Low expression in ESCC tissue (×200, ×400). (C) Strong positive immunocreation of IFITM3 in the cytoplasm of ESCC tissue (×200, ×400).
Figure 2Relative expression level of IFITM3 mRNA was detected by RT-PCR.
(M) Molecular marker. (1) and (2) respectively represent the mRNA expression level of β-actin and IFITM3 in tumor tissues with IFITM3 protein overexpression; (3) and (4) represent the mRNA expression level of β-actin and IFITM3 in their ANMs. (5) and (6) respectively represent the mRNA expression level of β-actin and IFITM3 in low IFITM3 protein expressed tumor tissues; (7) and (8) represent this expression level of β-actin and IFITM3 in their ANMs.
Figure 3Lymphatic metastatic recurrence curves for patients with different IFITM3 expression level and T status.
(A) and (B) respectively represent patients with IFITM3 overexpression (p = 0.010) and advanced T status (p = 0.004).
Multivariate Cox regression analysis of risk factors in pN0 ESCC.
|
| SE | Wald | HR | 95%CI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||||
| Age | 0.040 | 0.453 | 0.008 | 0.930 | 1.041 | 0.429 | 2.526 |
| Gender | 0.041 | 0.389 | 0.011 | 0.915 | 1.042 | 0.487 | 2.232 |
| Tumor size | 0.226 | 0.324 | 0.489 | 0.484 | 1.254 | 0.665 | 2.365 |
| T status | 0.904 | 0.253 | 12.783 |
| 2.470 | 1.505 | 4.054 |
| Differentiation | 0.311 | 0.350 | 0.790 | 0.374 | 1.365 | 0.687 | 2.712 |
| IFITM3 overexpression | 1.040 | 0.360 | 8.357 |
| 2.828 | 1.398 | 5.723 |
Notes.
regression coefficient
standard error
Wald value
hazard ratio
confidence interval
Figure 4Kaplan–Meier analysis of overall survival of ESCC patients.
Overall survival of patients with pN0 ESCC according to (A) IFITM3 expression level; (B) T status of tumor; (C) differentiation degree.
Univariate and multivariate analyses of overall survival for 104 cases of pN0 ESCC patients.
| Variables | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI |
| HR | 95% CI |
| |
| Gender | ||||||
| Male versus female | 1.095 | 0.440–2.727 | 0.846 | – | ||
| Age (years) | ||||||
| ≥50 versus <50 | 1.388 | 0.478–4.028 | 0.546 | – | ||
| Tumor size (cm) | ||||||
| ≥5 versus <5 | 2.076 | 0.960–4.490 | 0.063 | – | ||
| T status | ||||||
| T1 + T2 versus T3 + T4a | 3.082 | 1.162–8.175 |
| 3.979 | 1.443–10.974 |
|
| Differentiation degree | ||||||
| Moderate-high versus low | 3.125 | 1.445–6.758 |
| 2.346 | 1.056–5.212 |
|
| IFITM3 overexpression | ||||||
| Yes versus no | 3.644 | 1.373–9.673 |
| 4.260 | 1.548–11.723 |
|
Notes.
Statistical analysis was performed using the proportional hazard model (Cox). Data considered significant (p < 0.05) in the univariate analysis were examined in the multivariate analysis.
hazard ratio
confidence interval
p values < 0.05 in bold font were considered significant.