Jason H Stafford1, Takahisa Hirai1, Lei Deng1, Sophia B Chernikova1, Kimiko Urata1, Brian L West1, J Martin Brown1. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California (J.H.S., T.H., L.D., S.B.C., K.U., J.M.B.), Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan (T.H.); Plexxikon Inc., Berkeley, California (B.L.W.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) may initially respond to treatment with ionizing radiation (IR), but the prognosis remains extremely poor because the tumors invariably recur. Using animal models, we previously showed that inhibiting stromal cell-derived factor 1 signaling can prevent or delay GBM recurrence by blocking IR-induced recruitment of myeloid cells, specifically monocytes that give rise to tumor-associated macrophages. The present study was aimed at determining if inhibiting colony stimulating factor 1 (CSF-1) signaling could be used as an alternative strategy to target pro-tumorigenic myeloid cells recruited to irradiated GBM. METHODS: To inhibit CSF-1 signaling in myeloid cells, we used PLX3397, a small molecule that potently inhibits the tyrosine kinase activity of the CSF-1 receptor (CSF-1R). Combined IR and PLX3397 therapy was compared with IR alone using 2 different human GBM intracranial xenograft models. RESULTS: GBM xenografts treated with IR upregulated CSF-1R ligand expression and increased the number of CD11b+ myeloid-derived cells in the tumors. Treatment with PLX3397 both depleted CD11b+ cells and potentiated the response of the intracranial tumors to IR. Median survival was significantly longer for mice receiving combined therapy versus IR alone. Analysis of myeloid cell differentiation markers indicated that CSF-1R inhibition prevented IR-recruited monocyte cells from differentiating into immunosuppressive, pro-angiogenic tumor-associated macrophages. CONCLUSION: CSF-1R inhibition may be a promising strategy to improve GBM response to radiotherapy.
BACKGROUND:Glioblastoma (GBM) may initially respond to treatment with ionizing radiation (IR), but the prognosis remains extremely poor because the tumors invariably recur. Using animal models, we previously showed that inhibiting stromal cell-derived factor 1 signaling can prevent or delay GBM recurrence by blocking IR-induced recruitment of myeloid cells, specifically monocytes that give rise to tumor-associated macrophages. The present study was aimed at determining if inhibiting colony stimulating factor 1 (CSF-1) signaling could be used as an alternative strategy to target pro-tumorigenic myeloid cells recruited to irradiated GBM. METHODS: To inhibit CSF-1 signaling in myeloid cells, we used PLX3397, a small molecule that potently inhibits the tyrosine kinase activity of the CSF-1 receptor (CSF-1R). Combined IR and PLX3397 therapy was compared with IR alone using 2 different human GBM intracranial xenograft models. RESULTS: GBM xenografts treated with IR upregulated CSF-1R ligand expression and increased the number of CD11b+ myeloid-derived cells in the tumors. Treatment with PLX3397 both depleted CD11b+ cells and potentiated the response of the intracranial tumors to IR. Median survival was significantly longer for mice receiving combined therapy versus IR alone. Analysis of myeloid cell differentiation markers indicated that CSF-1R inhibition prevented IR-recruited monocyte cells from differentiating into immunosuppressive, pro-angiogenic tumor-associated macrophages. CONCLUSION:CSF-1R inhibition may be a promising strategy to improve GBM response to radiotherapy.
Authors: Mitomu Kioi; Hannes Vogel; Geoffrey Schultz; Robert M Hoffman; Griffith R Harsh; J Martin Brown Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2010-02-22 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Simon Yona; Ki-Wook Kim; Yochai Wolf; Alexander Mildner; Diana Varol; Michal Breker; Dalit Strauss-Ayali; Sergey Viukov; Martin Guilliams; Alexander Misharin; David A Hume; Harris Perlman; Bernard Malissen; Elazar Zelzer; Steffen Jung Journal: Immunity Date: 2012-12-27 Impact factor: 31.745
Authors: June L Chan; Susan W Lee; Benedick A Fraass; Daniel P Normolle; Harry S Greenberg; Larry R Junck; Stephen S Gebarski; Howard M Sandler Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Frederic Geissmann; Markus G Manz; Steffen Jung; Michael H Sieweke; Miriam Merad; Klaus Ley Journal: Science Date: 2010-02-05 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Haishan Lin; Ernestine Lee; Kevin Hestir; Cindy Leo; Minmei Huang; Elizabeth Bosch; Robert Halenbeck; Ge Wu; Aileen Zhou; Dirk Behrens; Diane Hollenbaugh; Thomas Linnemann; Minmin Qin; Justin Wong; Keting Chu; Stephen K Doberstein; Lewis T Williams Journal: Science Date: 2008-05-09 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Joshua D Crapser; Joseph Ochaba; Neelakshi Soni; Jack C Reidling; Leslie M Thompson; Kim N Green Journal: Brain Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Jason R Baird; Arta M Monjazeb; Omid Shah; Heather McGee; William J Murphy; Marka R Crittenden; Michael J Gough Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2017-04-19 Impact factor: 7.038