Literature DB >> 26538606

Voluntary reaction time and long-latency reflex modulation.

Christopher J Forgaard1, Ian M Franks1, Dana Maslovat2, Laurence Chin1, Romeo Chua3.   

Abstract

Stretching a muscle of the upper limb elicits short (M1) and long-latency (M2) reflexes. When the participant is instructed to actively compensate for a perturbation, M1 is usually unaffected and M2 increases in size and is followed by the voluntary response. It remains unclear if the observed increase in M2 is due to instruction-dependent gain modulation of the contributing reflex mechanism(s) or results from voluntary response superposition. The difficulty in delineating between these alternatives is due to the overlap between the voluntary response and the end of M2. The present study manipulated response accuracy and complexity to delay onset of the voluntary response and observed the corresponding influence on electromyographic activity during the M2 period. In all active conditions, M2 was larger compared with a passive condition where participants did not respond to the perturbation; moreover, these changes in M2 began early in the appearance of the response (∼ 50 ms), too early to be accounted for by voluntary overlap. Voluntary response latency influenced the latter portion of M2, with the largest activity seen when accuracy of limb position was not specified. However, when participants aimed for targets of different sizes or performed movements of various complexities, reaction time differences did not influence M2 period activity, suggesting voluntary activity was sufficiently delayed. Collectively, our results show that while a perturbation applied to the upper limbs can trigger a voluntary response at short latency (<100 ms), instruction-dependent reflex gain modulation remains an important contributor to EMG changes during the M2 period.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  M2; StartReact effect; long-latency reflex; reaction time; superposition

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26538606      PMCID: PMC6712581          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00648.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  9 in total

1.  Mechanical perturbations can elicit triggered reactions in the absence of a startle response.

Authors:  Christopher J Forgaard; Ian M Franks; Kimberly Bennett; Dana Maslovat; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Influence of kinesthetic motor imagery and effector specificity on the long-latency stretch response.

Authors:  Christopher J Forgaard; Ian M Franks; Dana Maslovat; Romeo Chua
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Perturbation Predictability Can Influence the Long-Latency Stretch Response.

Authors:  Christopher J Forgaard; Ian M Franks; Dana Maslovat; Romeo Chua
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Evidence for Startle Effects due to Externally Induced Lower Limb Movements: Implications in Neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Juan M Castellote; Markus Kofler; Andreas Mayr; Leopold Saltuari
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Cooperative hand movements: task-dependent modulation of ipsi- and contralateral cortical control.

Authors:  Miriam Schrafl-Altermatt; Christopher S Easthope
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2018-05

6.  Stabilizing stretch reflexes are modulated independently from the rapid release of perturbation-triggered motor plans.

Authors:  Hyunglae Lee; Eric J Perreault
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Dynamic Control of Upper Limb Stretch Reflex in Wrestlers.

Authors:  Sho Ito; Kento Nakagawa; Tsuyoshi Nakajima; Misaki Iteya; Larry Crawshaw; Kazuyuki Kanosue
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Effects of Dual Task Interference on Biomechanics of The Entire Lower Extremity During the Drop Vertical Jump.

Authors:  Satoshi Imai; Kengo Harato; Yutaro Morishige; Shu Kobayashi; Yasuo Niki; Kazuki Sato; Takeo Nagura
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 2.193

9.  Translations of the Humeral Head Elicit Reflexes in Rotator Cuff Muscles That Are Larger Than Those in the Primary Shoulder Movers.

Authors:  Constantine P Nicolozakes; Margaret S Coats-Thomas; Daniel Ludvig; Amee L Seitz; Eric J Perreault
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.