| Literature DB >> 26538370 |
Jianqiang Hu1, Wanrong Man1, Min Shen1, Mingming Zhang1, Jie Lin1, Tingting Wang1, Yu Duan1, Congye Li1, Rongqing Zhang1, Erhe Gao2, Haichang Wang1, Dongdong Sun1.
Abstract
Myocardial infarction (MI), which is characterized by chamber dilation and LV dysfunction, is associated with substantially higher mortality. We investigated the effects and underlying mechanisms of Luteolin on post-infarction cardiac dysfunction. Myocardial infarction was constructed by left anterior descending coronary artery ligation. In vitro, cultured neonatal cardiomyocytes subjected to simulated MI were used to probe mechanism. Luteolin significantly improved cardiac function, decreased cardiac enzyme and inflammatory cytokines release after MI. Enhanced autophagic flux as indicated by more autophagosomes puncta, less accumulation of aggresomes and P62 in the neonatal cardiomyocytes after hypoxia was observed in the Luteolin pre-treatment group. Western blot analysis also demonstrated that Luteolin up-regulated autophagy in the cardiomyocytes subjected to simulated MI injury. Furthermore, Luteolin increased mitochondrial membrane potential, adenosine triphosphate content, citrate synthase activity and complexes I/II/III/IV/V activities in the cardiomyocytes subjected to simulated MI injury. Interestingly, mammalian sterile 20-like kinase 1 (Mst1) knockout abolished the protective effects of Luteolin administration. Luteolin enhances cardiac function, reduces cardiac enzyme and inflammatory markers release after MI. The protective effects of Luteolin are associated with up-regulation of autophagy and improvement of mitochondrial biogenesis through Mst1 inhibition.Entities:
Keywords: autophagy; luteolin; mammalian Ste20-like kinase 1; myocardial infarction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26538370 PMCID: PMC4717847 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.12714
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
Figure 1Luteolin improves cardiac function and mitigates left ventricle remodelling in mice after MI. (A) Representative echocardiographic images at 4 weeks after MI; (B) LV ejection fraction (LVEF); (C) LV fraction shortening (LVFS); (D) LV end‐diastolic diameter (LVEDD); (E) LV end‐systolic diameter (LVESD); (F and G) first derivative of the LV pressure (± LV dp/dt max); (H) Luteolin decreased TUNEL‐positive cardiomyocytes subjected to hypoxia; (I) Quantitative analysis of apoptotic index; (J–P) Protein expression with representative gel blots of Caspase‐3, Cleaved Caspase‐3, Bcl‐2, Bax and GAPDH; LV: left ventricular; H: Hypoxia. *P < 0.05 versus Sham group; # P < 0.05 versus MI (H) group. † P < 0.05 versus MI+DMSO (H+DMSO) group.
Figure 2Luteolin attenuates adverse left ventricle remodelling and LV dysfunction through inhibiting Mst1 phosphorylation. (A–G) Luteolin promoted systolic function, attenuated LV dilation in the Mst1Tg mice, not in the Mst1−/− mice 4 weeks after MI; (H) Luteolin decreased cardiomyocytes apoptosis index in Mst1 overexpression (Ad‐Mst1) group, but not in Mst1 knockdown group (Ad‐sh‐Mst1) after hypoxia; (I) Quantitative analysis of apoptotic index; (J–P) Quantitative analysis of protein expression with representative gel blots of Caspase‐3, Cleaved Caspase‐3, Bcl‐2, Bax and GAPDH; *P < 0.05 versus Mst1 Tg Sham (control) group; # P < 0.05 versus Mst1Tg + MI (Ad‐ LacZ + H) group; † P < 0.05 versus Mst1Tg + MI+Luteolin (Ad‐ Mst1+ H) group; $ P < 0.05 versus Mst1−/−Sham (Ad‐LacZ + H +Luteolin) group; & P < 0.05 versus Ad‐Mst1+ H +Luteolin group; £ P < 0.05 versus Ad‐sh‐LacZ + H group.
Figure 3Luteolin enhances cardiomyocytes autophagy after hypoxia. (A) Luteolin increased the numbers of GFP‐LC3 puncta in cardiomyocytes transduced with Ad‐Mst1 after hypoxia; (B) Quantitative analysis of the number of GFP‐LC3 puncta; (C) Luteolin decreased the accumulation of P62 (orange) and aggresomes (red) in cardiomyocytes underwent hypoxia injury; (D) Quantitative analysis of the number of cells positively stained with P62 and aggresomes. (E) Luteolin increased the numbers of red and green puncta in cardiomyocytes transduced with Ad‐GFP‐mRFP ‐LC3 after hypoxia. (F) Quantitative analysis of the mean numbers of autophagosomes and autolysosomes. (G–L) Representative Immunoblots and quantitative analyses of Beclin1, P62, Mst1, p‐Mst1 and LC3‐II/GAPDH. *P < 0.05 versus control group; # P < 0.05 versus H group; † P < 0.05 versus H+DMSO group.
Figure 4Luteolin augments cardiomyocytes autophagy subjected to hypoxia through Mst1 inhibition. (A) Luteolin increased the number of GFP‐LC3 puncta in the Ad‐Mst1 group; (B) Quantitative analysis of the number of GFP‐LC3 puncta; (C) Luteolin decreased the accumulation of P62 and aggresomes in the Ad‐Mst1 group; (D) Quantitative analysis of the number of cells positively stained with P62 and aggresomes; (E–H) Representative immunoblots and quantitative analyses of Beclin1, P62 and LC3‐II/GAPDH. *P < 0.05 versus control group; # P < 0.05 versus Ad‐ LacZ + H group; † P < 0.05 versus Ad‐ Mst1+ H group; $ P < 0.05 versus Ad‐LacZ + H +Luteolin group; & P < 0.05 versus Ad‐Mst1+ H +Luteolin group; £ P < 0.05 versus Ad‐sh‐LacZ + H group.
Figure 5Luteolin improves mitochondrial function in cardiomyocytes after hypoxia. (A) Representative images of JC‐1 staining; (B) The ratio of aggregated and monomeric JC‐1; (C and D) ATP content and citrate synthase (CS) activity; (E) Enzymatic activities of complexes I–V in cardiomyocyte mitochondria. *P < 0.05 versus control group; # P < 0.05 versus H group; † P < 0.05 versus H+DMSO group.
Figure 6Luteolin promotes mitochondrial function in cardiomyocytes after hypoxia by inhibition of Mst1. (A) Luteolin improved mitochondrial membrane potential in Mst1 overexpression group; (B) the ratio of aggregated and monomeric JC‐1; (C and D) ATP content and citrate synthase (CS) activity; (E) Enzymatic activities of complexes I–V in cardiomyocyte mitochondria. *P < 0.05 versus control group; # P < 0.05 versus Ad‐ LacZ + H group; † P < 0.05 versus Ad‐ Mst1+ H group; $ P < 0.05 versus Ad‐LacZ + H +Luteolin group; & P < 0.05 versus Ad‐Mst1+ H +Luteolin group; £ P < 0.05 versus Ad‐sh‐LacZ + H group.