Literature DB >> 26538331

Discrimination between conformational selection and induced fit protein-ligand binding using Integrated Global Fit analysis.

Franz-Josef Meyer-Almes1.   

Abstract

Molecular recognition between proteins and small molecule ligands is at the heart of biological function in cellular systems and the basis of modern rational drug development. Therefore, the mechanisms governing protein-ligand interaction have been objects of research for many decades. The last 15 years has seen a revival of a discussion whether conformational selection (CS) or induced fit (IF) is the most relevant binding mechanism. A decreasing observed rate constant, k obs, with increasing ligand concentration was considered to be a hallmark of CS, but according to contemporary knowledge, a positive saturating behavior of k obs can be explained by both CS and IF mechanisms. The only currently recognized kinetic method to differentiate between both binding mechanisms includes the measurement of two separate series of binding kinetics with variation of either protein or ligand under pseudo-first-order conditions. This study avoids the disadvantage of high protein concentrations and provides evidence that a comprehensive Integrated Global Fit analysis of sets of binding kinetics with just varied ligand concentration in combination with equilibrium data and optional displacement kinetics can effectively differentiate between CS and IF binding mechanisms. The limiting situation, when physical binding dominates over the previous (CS) or subsequent (IF) conformational changes, is carefully analyzed. Finally, the relevance of kinetic methods and the elucidation of more complex binding mechanisms are discussed for advanced rational selection and optimization of drug candidates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Binding kinetics; Binding mechanism; Drug development; Protein–drug interaction; Protein–ligand binding

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26538331     DOI: 10.1007/s00249-015-1090-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Biophys J        ISSN: 0175-7571            Impact factor:   1.733


  49 in total

Review 1.  Conformational selection in trypsin-like proteases.

Authors:  Nicola Pozzi; Austin D Vogt; David W Gohara; Enrico Di Cera
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 6.809

2.  The energy landscapes and motions of proteins.

Authors:  H Frauenfelder; S G Sligar; P G Wolynes
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The binding mechanisms of intrinsically disordered proteins.

Authors:  Jakob Dogan; Stefano Gianni; Per Jemth
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.676

4.  Non-linear optimization of biochemical pathways: applications to metabolic engineering and parameter estimation.

Authors:  P Mendes; D Kell
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Demonstration of a folding after binding mechanism in the recognition between the measles virus NTAIL and X domains.

Authors:  Marion Dosnon; Daniela Bonetti; Angela Morrone; Jenny Erales; Eva di Silvio; Sonia Longhi; Stefano Gianni
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 5.100

Review 6.  Essential role of conformational selection in ligand binding.

Authors:  Austin D Vogt; Nicola Pozzi; Zhiwei Chen; Enrico Di Cera
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 2.352

7.  Probing conformational plasticity of the activation domain of trypsin: the role of glycine hinges.

Authors:  Linda Gombos; József Kardos; András Patthy; Péter Medveczky; László Szilágyi; András Málnási-Csizmadia; László Gráf
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  A pre-steady state kinetic analysis of the αY60W mutant of trans-3-chloroacrylic acid dehalogenase: implications for the mechanism of the wild-type enzyme.

Authors:  Jamison P Huddleston; Gottfried K Schroeder; Kenneth A Johnson; Christian P Whitman
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Conformational selection or induced fit? 50 years of debate resolved.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Changeux; Stuart Edelstein
Journal:  F1000 Biol Rep       Date:  2011-09-01

10.  Energetic dissection of Gleevec's selectivity toward human tyrosine kinases.

Authors:  Roman V Agafonov; Christopher Wilson; Renee Otten; Vanessa Buosi; Dorothee Kern
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 15.369

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  "Multiple partial recognitions in dynamic equilibrium" in the binding sites of proteins form the molecular basis of promiscuous recognition of structurally diverse ligands.

Authors:  Daisuke Kohda
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2017-12-14

2.  Induced Fit Is a Special Case of Conformational Selection.

Authors:  Pradipta Chakraborty; Enrico Di Cera
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 3.  Rate Constants and Mechanisms of Protein-Ligand Binding.

Authors:  Xiaodong Pang; Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 12.981

Review 4.  Analytical and functional aspects of protein-ligand interactions: Beyond induced fit and conformational selection.

Authors:  Michelle Redhair; William M Atkins
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 4.013

Review 5.  Mechanisms of ligand binding.

Authors:  Enrico Di Cera
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2020-12

6.  Induced fit versus conformational selection: From rate constants to fluxes… and back to rate constants.

Authors:  Georges Vauquelin; Dominique Maes
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2021-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.