Literature DB >> 26537970

[Imitation of an Anderson type II dens fracture by a motion artefact in computed tomography : Four case examples].

M Morgenstern1, J Friederichs2, C Gärtner3, V Bühren2, O Gonschorek2.   

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) is the method of choice in the diagnosis and classification of odontoid fractures with a sensitivity of more than 99 % and a specificity almost equally as high. In this article we report on four cases where CT-generated motion artefacts exactly mimicked an Anderson type II fracture of the dens axis, initially leading to a wrong diagnosis. Although this seems to be a very rare event, these cases indicate that overlooked CT motion artefacts can lead to severe consequences and attention must be paid to the radiological signs outlined in this report.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anderson II; Computed tomography; Dens axis; Motion artefact; Swallowing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26537970     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-015-0112-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  8 in total

1.  A pragmatic approach to metal artifact reduction in CT: merging of metal artifact reduced images.

Authors:  Oliver Watzke; Willi A Kalender
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-03-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  The contemporary treatment of odontoid injuries.

Authors:  Travis G Maak; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Fractures of the odontoid process of the axis.

Authors:  L D Anderson; R T D'Alonzo
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Cervical spine clearance in blunt trauma: evaluation of a computed tomography-based protocol.

Authors:  Barry Sanchez; Kenneth Waxman; Thomas Jones; Scott Conner; Richard Chung; Salvador Becerra
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2005-07

5.  Imaging for evaluation of suspected cervical spine trauma: a 2-year analysis.

Authors:  R H Daffner; R L Sciulli; A Rodriguez; J Protetch
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  CT scans through metal scanning technique versus hardware composition.

Authors:  N Haramati; R B Staron; K Mazel-Sperling; K Freeman; E L Nickoloff; C Barax; F Feldman
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 7.  Management of fractures of the dens (odontoid process).

Authors:  W O Southwick
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Computed tomography reconstruction artifact suggesting cervical spine subluxation.

Authors:  Daniel M Sciubba; Michael J Dorsi; Ryan Kretzer; Allan J Belzberg
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2008-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.